Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Mike Tannenbaum: Stay or Go?

2011 was probably not Mike Tannenbaum's best year. The team he is charged to oversee saw a decrease in overall talent. I think he takes too hard of a hit on this front, though. Tannenbaum had to spend an extremely condensed offseason playing defense. He had key players hitting free agency up and down the roster. With the CBA situation unclear, he could not do much work extending key players in advance. It was inevitable the team was going to lose some of them. As it is, he locked up most of his key free agents.

He tried every creative approach under the sun to end up with Nnamdi Asomugha, the best free agent on the market. The Jets might have already had Darrelle Revis, but there are only so many top level players in the league. Aggressively pursuing one is difficult to get upset about.

On top of this, no key free agent the Jets lost did much of anything with a new team. Yes, there were some moves I did not necessarily agree with like signing Plaxico Burress instead of trying to keep Braylon Edwards. Maybe Braylon would have been better off in familiar surroundings, but the fact he currently does not have a team is pretty telling.

Tannenbaum undoubtedly failed in some key ways, though. The offensive line was clearly not handled well. Wayne Hunter played adequately down the stretch in 2010, but handing him the right tackle job was a big mistake in retrospect. He got Mark Sanchez hit over 20 times. Tannenbaum also had chances to improve depth and neglected to do so. By contrast, the Patriots picked up Brian Waters when the Chiefs cut the highly regarded guard. When they lost their center, Waters helped bring stability to their line and ended up in the Pro Bowl. When Nick Mangold got hurt, the Jets had to use an undrafted rookie.

Another area where Tannenbaum failed was adding more to the pass rush, particularly since the Jets were transitioning to a coverage based scheme. Aaron Maybin was a great scrap heap pickup as a situational guy, but there were other bargain basement guys available that Tannenbaum did not touch in free agency. Another neglected piece of this was the defensive line. The Jets really missed Shaun Ellis and Trevor Pryce this year. The team had a bunch of defensive linemen who were big and could hold the point of attack but nobody who could collapse the pocket. Ellis is not doing much for New England, but the team missed what he brought to the table last year. Muhammad Wilkerson played well for a rookie, but he could not replace everything Ellis did so quickly.

The 800 pound gorilla in the room, though, regarding Tannenbaum is the play of Mark Sanchez. Sanchez was supposed to carry more of the load this year. The team's success depended on it. Sanchez was not up to the task, and by the end of the year, the Jets had to scale things back on offense. Quarterback is the most important position on the field. It is really difficult to win without a good one. We are getting close to the point where we can say Tannenbaum is 0 for 2 trying to Draft a franchise quarterback with Kellen Clemens being the other. A general manager can be the best in every other area, but one who cannot identify and get a franchise quarterback is probably not going to build a championship team.

Tannenbaum's overall body of work is still probably good enough to buy him more time. I heavily disapprove of the way he has handled the Brian Schottenheimer situation. If Schottenheimer sticks around, that is an indication to me that Tannenbaum should probably go sooner rather than later since it would prove he cannot identify and fix an obvious and critical flaw. Maybe he is going to fire Schottenheimer, though, if the Jaguars do not hire him. Maybe Tannenbaum gets the problem and is just handling it really ridiculously, getting in front of a microphone and lying to everybody when he says Schottenheimer is good. If that is the case, I would be less inclined to see him go.

Either way, Tannenbaum is lucky he has build up good will because he has needed to cash it this year. Do you think he should stay or go?

Poll
Should Mike Tannenbaum stay or go?
Stay
635 votes
Go
556 votes

1191 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Gang Green Nation

Flight Connections 05-26-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 0 comments

Flight Connections 05-25-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 11 comments

Flight Connections 05-24-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 17 comments

Flight Connections 05-23-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 11 comments

Flight Connections 05-22-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 10 comments

Flight Connections 05-21-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 10 comments

Comments

Display:

Tanny should stay

he does a great job of crunching the numbers and swinging deals, hes not afraid to take a gamble and hes not a cheapskate like most other GMs…godforbid if he leave and we get Carl Petersen, that guy pinches a penny so hard Lincoln screams

"The message to the rest of the league is, hey, the Jets are coming, and we're going to give you everything we got. And I think that's going to be more than you can handle"

by AFCxxBEAST on Jan 4, 2012 11:47 AM EST reply actions  

Tanny needs to step it up this offseason

the only reason I i would let him go is if someone was head and heels better….. in my mind I think Bill polian is good, but not that much better than tanny. I will say I wouldn’t be mad if we did let him go but wouldn’t be mad if he stayed.

#YEAR_OF_THE_TAKEOVER

by SLAUGHTERHOUSE on Jan 4, 2012 11:51 AM EST reply actions  

Tanny had an off year, so what?

He was around when we drafted tons of talent in the recent years, our core 4 and the same year we had multiple picks, most of those players stayed on the team at least through their rookie contracts.

And the home of the .... JETS!!!
Now lets get a G-D snack!!!
"You might not like that. You might be very cynical about that. Well, f**k it, I don't care what you think."-Roy McDonald

by Noble_Lance on Jan 4, 2012 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

Stay

He can wheel and deal. But I think he relied a little too much on the coaches and the coaches dropped the ball. I have to think he went with the advice of the coaches on Hunter and Vlad, and that may have been somewhat justified based on Hunter’s play last year.

I give them absolutely no credit for Maybin though. Those morons cut the guy after he flashed so much during the pre-seaon. They only brought him back because they were forced to because of injury to Thomas.

But Tanny has put together a core that we all believe is good enough to win it all. Last year slipped away, but I don’t think it was really his fault. Look at all that talent on offense. You can’t seriously tell me that they shouldn’t have performed better than they did.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

I disagree on Shaun Ellis, by the way.

Shaun has done squat in New England. And t here’s no reason to think he would’ve performed any better here. This I give Tanny a ton of credit for. We dump guys at exactly the right time. And he has the balls to do it with fan faves. Nobody has upticked after leaving.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t say we should have kept Ellis. I said we didn’t replace the pass rusher he provided in 2010.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on Jan 4, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Tannenbaum has been good at cutting ties at the right time (and that is the case with Ellis too) but he was very good in 2010.

by Buzzy on Jan 4, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

If he doesn't get rid of Schottenheimer he can go as well

Anyone that can’t identify Schottenheimer as a weakness on this team that will prevent the Jets from winning any given game (not just the Super Bowl) is also a weakness himself. Calling Schottenheimer a “good coach” is a F’ing slap to the face of all truly good coaches…

by GangGreen73 on Jan 4, 2012 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

+1

It’s not so much Sanchez as keeping Schotty. I hope he has some common sense and lets the guy go for a real coordinator.

by PowerBar on Jan 4, 2012 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

No Mention of the running game?

I still think one of the reasons the Jets struggled this year is because they didn’t have an every down back to rely on. Shohn Greene is nice, but he needs too many runs to get that big one.

6 Times they had 110 yards or more and the team went 4-2 in those games.
Last year they were under 110 yards only 4 times
The year before they were under 110 yards only 4 times

The Jets need an RB who can pound it out for 3-4 yards on every carry, not someone who bursts for 15 yards once every 4 carries.

"Line brawl på Long Island!? Matt Moulson i huvudrollen!!!?! Wot!?" SwedishIslander
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jan 4, 2012 11:57 AM EST reply actions  

A crappy run-blocking RT has a lot more to do with that than Shonn. But I agree that he’s more Robin than Batman.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Shonn is better than you think

as a pure run carrier. 4.5 YPC his last 12 games behind a vastly diminished line playing with injured ribs for 7 of those games is pretty good. It is true that he does not break off huge runs, but he gets caught for losses much less frequently than other RBs. His biggest weakness is actually that he is not good out of the backfield or as a blocker, so he is a liability on passing downs. I would like to pair him with a more elusive back, but the Jets have many holes to fill in the off-season…

by Buzzy on Jan 4, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Well

Here’s a breakdown of the run from earlier in the season by me:

http://www.ganggreennation.com/2011/9/26/2450616/breaking-down-the-run-vs-oakland

"Line brawl på Long Island!? Matt Moulson i huvudrollen!!!?! Wot!?" SwedishIslander
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jan 4, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes-as I mentioned last 12 games.

Oakland we had an even worse like (no Mangold)-probably a below average one.

by Buzzy on Jan 4, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

He leaves tons of yards on the field with his poor vision and misreads. And i’m not giving him and credit for running with a boo-boo on his ribs. I mean, cmon. Everybody has boo-boos in the NFL. Not everybody rolls around like he just had an amputation after he hits the turf. Shonn is soft.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

True

but either way 4.5 YPC over the last 12 games behind that line (no one else was close to that) is pretty good-as is being among the least yardage-losing RBs in the league. Of course that goes with his weakness of not gaining enough yards after contact or breaking big runs with good footwork/speed. He is pretty good but limited. I would l love to have a Ray Rice (do it all) or a Charles-type as an awesome compliment, but I think fixing the RT situation kills more birds with one stone than acquiring another back.

by Buzzy on Jan 4, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, we defintiely need a big upgrade at RT.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

If we let go of LDT

We’re going to need another back anyway, and hopefully one that can catch

"Line brawl på Long Island!? Matt Moulson i huvudrollen!!!?! Wot!?" SwedishIslander
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Jan 4, 2012 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

About that backfield thing

that’s why we had LT. And that’s also what i think they want Joe McKnight to become.

by darshv3 on Jan 4, 2012 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

he should stay to fix some of the mess he created

he has had some great years as GM with this team but last year he dropped the ball . he needs to get rid of schotty before he gets my respect back

if its for you it won't pass you

by tinley24 on Jan 4, 2012 11:57 AM EST reply actions  

In terms of player acquisition

My problem with Tannenbaum is he does not seems to have his own ideas. He drafts the guys that he is told to by coaches or evaluators seemingly without his own ideas. This leaves him as less of a GM and more of a financial manager, but given some of the contracts (Holmes) and the resulting lack of depth he does not have a spotless record as a cap guy either. In general the team has relied too much on trading picks and FAs, and that approach leaves you vulnerable when you don’t hit home runs. The Jets last 3 drafts have not been all that good…

by Buzzy on Jan 4, 2012 11:59 AM EST reply actions  

You're Too Kind, John B

Tanny should go. There’s no doubt about it. He is an accountant and attorney, not a football man. He doesn’t know squat about evaluating talent or putting together a team. He is responsible for gutting the leadership of this team and destroying the great chemistry it had over the last two offseasons.

He turned over 1/4 of the roster in a year where there were no OTAs, mini camps and a shortened TC. As you point out his solution for depth on the OL was raw rookies, even when quality FAs were available and the Jets had the money and cap space.

Pursuing Nnamdi was a huge mistake. That would have been too much money tied up in one position and the team had other glaring needs. He would have been better off pursuing Jonathan Joseph.

There are holes all over the roster because the team has had too many 3 and 4 player drafts and he has missed on too many of his picks. The most important position in the 3-4 D is the OLB position and aside from Gholston, he has failed to address it when the Jets lack of a consistent pass rush has been perhaps their biggest need for 5 years or more.

Keeping Holmes over Edwards was another glaring mistake. It not only hurt the offense because they no longer had a deep threat, but also hurt the running attack and the offense lost a fiery player who made a lot of big plays and made fewer mistakes than Holmes.

Finally, his backing of Schottenheimer show that he is totally clueless regarding the game of football. There is no way he should be retained as the Jets’ GM.

"Reality is purely the perception of the individual mind. It follows, that since no two minds are alike, no two perceptions of reality are alike. It further follows, that what reality is to one, may seem complete madness to someone else."

– Yefim Novikov

by joeklecko on Jan 4, 2012 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

Ugh

Just when I was about to write a post backing Tanny, I read this. You make a lot of good points as always.

I agree that he was too “risky” in a shortened training camp year, although I supported him pursuing Nmandi.

His draft picks have been poor last two years; but I think he’s earned the right to get one more year to redeem himself.

I still think that his and Rex’s backing of Shotty is a PR ploy, as well as paying Shotty back for whatever reason they feel they need to. NOT that this is something they have to do or should do, but they feel they should.

To sum up – if Shotty is gone before this next year, I’ll support both Tanny and Rex. But if Shotty is retained for 2012, then I believe that 2012 will be – and it is abso-freaking-lutely amazing that I am about to say this – time for a change in the organization from the ground up (coach / GM / core).

Damn.

Being born in New York and rooting for the Islanders, Jets, and Mets. Yeah, I know.
Twitter: cmauceri524

by CharlieIsles on Jan 4, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Stay for now

His first priority is to rid the franchise of Schotty nice guy or not. This is a business, we let TJ go and he was a nicer guy. We need to hire/promote an OC that believes and preaches the Jets offensive football philosophy. Release Hunter, Brunell & Scott, move Eric from safety to LB and find a safety. We really need two new safeties because although Leonard is a good safety he is too slow and small to cover TE’s. Bring back Braylon and release Plax. Find a younger more athletic veteran QB to push Sanchez. I have more ideas that have already been expressed by others on this site regarding the DL & LB’s.

by NYCKID on Jan 4, 2012 12:36 PM EST reply actions  

He's not perfect or ideal but ...

I’d keep him for now unless we could specifically get Polian.

by mangold'sbeard on Jan 4, 2012 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

Thats got to be a joke

Polian built a team that was solely contingent on one player and lacked any sort of core that was capable of keeping the team competitive after loosing it’s savior.
He stacked the colts like a house of cards with Manning being the only thing that kept the wheels from falling off completely.
No way.

by Can'tWait on Jan 4, 2012 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

half his team is undersized and focused on speed not power

And the home of the .... JETS!!!
Now lets get a G-D snack!!!
"You might not like that. You might be very cynical about that. Well, f**k it, I don't care what you think."-Roy McDonald

by Noble_Lance on Jan 4, 2012 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

it is

It was a bad joke and I m sorry about that. I was only trying to highlight the fact that Tanny looks pretty good next to Polian who didn’t do ANYTHING and his basic approach to GMing was to let Manning make people look good. Tanny’s not perfect but we got to 2 AFC championship games with Sanchez. Trying to focus on the big picture here.

by mangold'sbeard on Jan 4, 2012 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Polian is still building rosters based on how he built Buffalo in the 90's.

The game is different, and if not for Peyton Manning and the weak division they play in the Colts would have collapsed years ago due to the thin talent on that team. All he wants to do now is ensure a career for his son, and we’ve already gone down a similar road years ago (Weeb Ewbank ceding the coaching to his son-in-law Charley Winner – a more inapt name for a train wreck of a coach there could never be).

by Traveling Man on Jan 4, 2012 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Other thing about Polian is he has only worked in small markets and has notoriously thin skin.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on Jan 4, 2012 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

1 more year--The Proof is next Years Roster

As bad as Sanchez was this year, could you imagine Brunnel? Greg Mcelroy is not the answer at B/U. So Tanny has a junkie OL—-No depth other Vlad and Hunter. So his QB gets lit up—because his OC failed to teach what a hot route looks like….if Sanchez doesn’t get up from some of those hits we are toast way before the Miami debacle.

There have been countless (and mostly painful) posts on what the Jets need to do in the off season…so here’s his chance to make the three or four critical changes that could make us 10 win team again.

by jetsbaby on Jan 4, 2012 12:42 PM EST reply actions  

You Guys Thinking That Tanny Should Stay

You do realize that if he screws the pooch again this offseason and doesn’t adequately address the Jets holes/needs, that the team will flounder again in 2012 and that could result in Rex being fired as well as Tanny, don’t you?

How many chances do those guys get? Some of you are still supporting Schotty for crying out loud. Do you NEVER want to see the Jets win it all?

Just because someone is aggressive and arrogant doesn’t mean that he’s good or competent.

I’m really shocked and disappointed that so many of you are so blind to how bad Tanny is.

"Reality is purely the perception of the individual mind. It follows, that since no two minds are alike, no two perceptions of reality are alike. It further follows, that what reality is to one, may seem complete madness to someone else."

– Yefim Novikov

by joeklecko on Jan 4, 2012 12:48 PM EST reply actions  

Overall he has not done a bad job, as with anybody else in his position he has blown it on some picks/aquisitions. This year his most glaring mistakes were Wayne Hunter and not keeping Braylon Edwards. Plax was good in the redzone but thats all he his, Braylon was better everywhere else. Hunter apparently hates Sanchez because he singlehandedly tried to get him killed. WHEN gets rid of Schotty & Hunter that will be the first inkling that he is moving in the right direction.

by NYCKID on Jan 4, 2012 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

A huge portion of the QB question is related to this:
The offensive line was clearly not handled well. Wayne Hunter played adequately down the stretch in 2010, but handing him the right tackle job was a big mistake in retrospect. He got Mark Sanchez hit over 20 times. Tannenbaum also had chances to improve depth and neglected to do so

If indeed Sanchez is the most important figure on the team, and the most important “piece” of Mr. T’s reign, skimping on the OL is about the stupidest thing Mr. T could have done. Was it because he just looks for gym rat bargains or super-star game turners? Is it because he doesn’t understand football because he is a money (fantasy) guy? The OL is huge. There are not super bowl teams that don’t have at least above average OLs, they simply don’t exist.

And the .5 second difference, not to mention the hits not taken, not to mention the .5 yards more on the ground that good OLs give the QB are nearly immeasurable in importance. Sanchez never had experienced multi-game chaos pressure before. Look what happened. Those small differences turn very good QBs into bad looking nobodies. For Tanny to absolutely fail in this area – and yes, he absolutely failed because you need to SECURE this area of the team, not gamble or guess at it – was just plain stupid, and it ended up affecting all kinds of areas of the team in a domino effect. That 1.5 to .5 seconds made the QB doubt himself, exposed Schotty’s bizarre inability to game plan, ruined the run game, made Holmes a non-target and “a cancer”. So many of these major themes likely would have been avoided, including the playoff failure, if the team did not try to save money there.

by ________key on Jan 4, 2012 1:08 PM EST reply actions  

It should be mentioned that some of the bad line play was also not Hunter

Brick had a really substandard year, Mangold was hurt, Slauson was inconsistent from game to game, Moore seems to be declining…then you get to Hunter. I think it is all the more reason we have to get a good RT.

by Buzzy on Jan 4, 2012 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

good point Buzzy. I think it is a chain reaction, in some ways. Put a weak link in there and everyone is affected. I’m not saying that Hunter made Brick bad, but it may have had some influence on the whole unit. A big up grade there and the entire unit is different.

by ________key on Jan 4, 2012 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Stay...for now.

He essentially WRECKED AND RUINED this 2011 season. We don’t really need to list all of the reasons, we know them by now. 2012, shape up and build up the team again…Fail again? Walking papers will be waiting.

by winnebagosun on Jan 4, 2012 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

So we're just supposed to forget about all the good he's done, and pretend that coaching ineptitude didn't screw the pooch here?

Were Wilkerson and Kerley not good picks? Wilson and McKnight? Is Greene not solid? Brick and Revis and Mangold? Is this not the core of a winner? Did he have any reason to not trust his coaching staff before the season?

And guys are still developing. Pouha is a stud, and so is Devito. Maybin might take another step and ermerge. Ducasse and Kenrick are raw, but physically gifted and may end up being dominant. Wilson and McKnight may keep making jumps in their third season.

I’m not ready to put a bullet in Tanny because his OC is retarded and his HC thought that a safety tandem of Leonard and Smith would suffice. Im also not gonna blame him for Hunter when Hunter showed competence for several games last season.

There’s no reason to fire him. We went 8-8. The wheels didn’t fall off. Firing Tanny would be knee-jerk.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 1:15 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Woops. That was supposed to be a reply for klecko.

by Crackback on Jan 4, 2012 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

I think we actually need two new safeties not just replace Eric Smith. Smith would be better suited as a run-stopping / pass-rushing siyuational linebacker. He can’t cover a TE to save his life. Leonard is a good player but he is too small & slow to cover a TE…we got torched by big athletic TE’s all year. Pool has not proved that he is the answer either but he is a little better in coverage. We all know what the other holes on O & D that exist and have posted them so i won’t rehash them.

by NYCKID on Jan 4, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

You forgot Harris in there as well but all valid points haha

And the home of the .... JETS!!!
Now lets get a G-D snack!!!
"You might not like that. You might be very cynical about that. Well, f**k it, I don't care what you think."-Roy McDonald

by Noble_Lance on Jan 4, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

You're Giving Tanny Credit for the Good Players You Listed

Based on what I’ve read/heard, that credit should go to Joey Clinkscales and the scouting dept. Still, almost every GM these days with the exception of Matt Millen gets some picks right.

Pouha and Devito are hardly studs. They’re solid, mostly reliable players, but don’t scare anyone. Ducasse, Kenrick, Wilson,McKnight, Wilkerson and Kerley all have talent, but didn’t exactly light up the league or scare anyone. “May” develop is risking a lot imo. Lots of other rookies come in and play at an extremely high level. Why is it that with the exception of Revis and perhaps one or two others, that doesn’t happen with the Jets? Why do things have to get to a crisis mode with the Jets (the OL before Mangold and Brick, the S position, the WR position, and the pass rush) before Tanny does anything about it.

Yes, he’s done some things well, but I think the bad far outweighs the good and you guys give him too much credit. Listen, I hope I’m wrong, he’ll have an A+ draft and the Jets will be back in the AFC Championship Game again next season, if not the Super Bowl, but I’m not holding my breath on it. If I were a gambling man, I’d bet that Schotty will be back, Holmes will still be here causing problems in the lockerroom and on the field, and the Jets still won’t have a pass rush, be able to cover TEs or RBs over the middle, and their safeties (and perhaps OL depth) will still suck.

"Reality is purely the perception of the individual mind. It follows, that since no two minds are alike, no two perceptions of reality are alike. It further follows, that what reality is to one, may seem complete madness to someone else."

– Yefim Novikov

by joeklecko on Jan 4, 2012 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

you're right

besides Revis, we have a lack of real playmakers on the team. Maybe McKnight is the guy or maybe Kerley…they look electric sometimes on the field…but we probably won’t ever find out because Schotty doesn’t know how to use them. And that again, falls on Tannenbaum.

by PowerBar on Jan 4, 2012 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Mcknight had a probowl year in returns.
Wilk has started every game, been EXACTLY what Rex requires out of the position and then some as a rookie
Wilson might just be the most solid slot corner in the league in only his second year.
Kerley hasn’t stopped improving since he’s hit the field on offense as a rookie.
What exactly is your definition of lighting the world on fire?
Tanny also has yet to let a drafted stud leave this team without replacing or even improving the position.
He’s hitting his draft picks and keeping them on the team.
Come on Joe.

by Can'tWait on Jan 4, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. There have been some negatives but everyone is over looking quite a bit here.

Do you have any idea how damn near impossible it is to resign the core of the team after their first NFL contracts AFTER they all have probowl years? Brick, Mangold and Revis. All probowlers and all signed and happy. Harris should be a pro bowler and he signed up as well.
That stuff just doesn’t happen in this league. Odds were that at least one of them should have hit the market and ended up on another team if not two of them.
The guy has found a way to keep young studs happy on both sides of the ball with goofballs for a head coach and OC.
That, in the end should be his greatest accomplishment along with strait up nailing a bunch of his draft picks.
+1 crack

by Can'tWait on Jan 4, 2012 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

it depends on how he fares and how the team does this offseason/next year

he can get one pass for not addressing needs once, but do it twice in a row and he’s obviously not doing his job.

by PowerBar on Jan 4, 2012 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

He should go ...

The problem is ….. there is now too cozy of a little triangle between Woody, Tannenbaum and Rex. They’re all drinking the same kool-aid ….. perhaps fueled by Rex’s bluster but …. probably more fueled by Woody’s bluster that began with the Favre signing (yes …. before Rex’s regime) but then, after that crashed and burned, the ridiculous overreaction of trading up for an inexperienced, slightly above average QB in Sanchez and immediately declaring him the franchise QB for the next ten years. The ongoing lie continues and the bad decisions have also compounded yet …… no one seems to dare question how this team has been put together by this troika.

Tannenbaum should go first along with Schotty. I’ll give Rex a pass for another year or two and see how things go on that front.

by Jeff I on Jan 4, 2012 2:24 PM EST reply actions  

I consider Mike T responsible for the continued support of Schottenheimer as well as the "it ain't broke, don't fix it" attitude from the FO

He is the teams manager. The moves all either were his idea or he signed off on, typically the former. Like John said, there were mitigating circumstances with the players we let go, and the job he’s done over the past few seasons in bringing talent to NY are redeeming factors.

When you get down to it Mike T is more of a business mind than a football one. Business sense and cold unsentimental management are cornerstones of the job no doubt, but I’m not convinced he’s effectively doing either. When you boil it all down, it was Mike T’s idea to value savings over personnel, as he cited financial reasons for not retaining Lowery (he also alleged an “excess of DB’s”, another strike against him), Edwards, Woody and the rest. The names I didn’t mention were replaceable and smart business decision.

John’s right, it is telling Edwards isn’t on a team. But there was nothing physically wrong with him when we let him go. Character issues sure, but as I’ve argued in several posts, Santonio’s issues loom larger. You cannot ignore that when Edwards was last on the team is the last we had a true down field passing threat, at least relatively speaking. Santonio Holmes’ contact extension is something else I took umbrage with at the time and still do.

I think if those three men; Lowery, Woody, and Edwards were on the team this year it could have been a very different year. The worst part: it was affordable, but the time and energy was spent on failed Nnamdi bids instead of keeping our talent, and too much faith was placed in coaching to replace them with players of lesser skill.

I could take him or leave him at this point, but I attribute the lack of proactive measures to make the team better this year to him. I also consider it his responsibility to step up and say Schottenheimer isn’t working, and to sack him. That’s his job.

Arm chair GM. Mod/contributing writer at SBN Jets blog GGN.
GangGreenNation.com

by Bro Namath on Jan 4, 2012 3:12 PM EST reply actions  

I see why Tone Time was a fifth round pick...

Maybe he should have signed him to continuous one year contracts… just keep doing that with WRs so they fight for yards!

Just a high school student who lives his ambitions of working for the NFL,

Facebook = http://facebook.com/prointerviews/
YouTube = http://youtube.com/user/ProInterviews/

by Max Strauss on Jan 4, 2012 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

He was a 5th because the Rooney family believes in a high standard of playing and living.

that year they had the rape accusations of Big Ben and the Smoking of Holmes, they had to make a statement. It was either Ben or Holmes, they went with the non franchise QB

And the home of the .... JETS!!!
Now lets get a G-D snack!!!
"You might not like that. You might be very cynical about that. Well, f**k it, I don't care what you think."-Roy McDonald

by Noble_Lance on Jan 4, 2012 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Keep but apply serious tongue-lashing

Tannenbaum is very good at some things: dealing with the salary cap and making trades.

What he is not good at is talent evaluation and management. He basically, looking at the deals he’s done overall, seems to have a “one size fits all, all players are interchangeable” type approach – slide one cog out, slide another in. That’s where we get the Plaxico for Braylon, Mason for Cotchery substitutions. Even LDT for Thomas Jones, to some extent (in hindsight turned out to be a good move for last year, but I think I was reasonably justified in not expecting it at the time).

Also, Schottenheimer MUST be unloaded.

French fries are really Belgian, sausages and bagels have the same amount of protein, two countries' names mean "turkey", and Santa Claus was invented by the Coca-Cola company. Is life weird or what?

Debe ser verde y volante - Πράσινο και να πετάει - It's gotta be green and it's gotta fly!

by Rabbit T on Jan 4, 2012 3:44 PM EST reply actions  

The Sanchez pick was due to Schottenheimer.

He worked out all the QB’s and it was his recommendation to push to get the Sancheese. Remember, the organization kept him around and pushed him on Rex, and I’m sure p\art of the deal was the initial autonomy and input on offensive personnel he has had under Rex. So while Mr T undoubtedly pulled the trigger, Schotty was the one who put .22 caliber bullet in the 44 Magnum and handed him the gun.

by Traveling Man on Jan 4, 2012 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah Schotty was having dinner with Rex, Tanny and Mark.

the article said Sanchez reminded Schotty of Drew Brees.

And the home of the .... JETS!!!
Now lets get a G-D snack!!!
"You might not like that. You might be very cynical about that. Well, f**k it, I don't care what you think."-Roy McDonald

by Noble_Lance on Jan 4, 2012 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Tanny picks a good 22 man roster

But the depth of the Jets was atrocious this year. Also, didn’t Tanny’s wheeling & dealing to put together the 2010 squad hinder the 2011 squad? The Jets are committed almost 20 million now to Santonio and B. Scott, two guys they don’t really want, because Tanny re-structured deals right? I don’t see how this a good job. The 06 and 07 drafts were pretty great, but otherwise, given the current state of the Jets, what good has Tanny done?

by heisthejuan on Jan 4, 2012 4:40 PM EST reply actions  

he's acknowledged the lack of depth

He’ll own up to mistakes, and he knows he has work to do. Also, i think there really is a pretty solid chance of Bart Scott being cut or traded.

by darshv3 on Jan 4, 2012 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

biggest problem on this team is wayne hunter IMHO

a replacement FA O lineman should be their top priority. second they should fire schotty but im not sure that will happen.

by RichTodd on Jan 4, 2012 5:34 PM EST reply actions  

Rex

He seems to be getting a pass. I thought all of his weaknesses were on parade for most of the year. The mindless mouth-flapping — it often feels like a scared guy trying to convince himself. (The nonsensical ’I’ll take him on now’ stuff) There seemed to be no discipline on the field. Wrong number guys on the field time and time again; the gross deterioration in penalties. His seeming detachment from the offense and special teams. When he made a parade of getting involved toward the end of the season, he just called wildcats. The constant invocation of ‘ground and pound’ despite fact that his staff didn’t seem to be paying attention. His infatuation with Schotty is just mulish. I’m pulling hard for Sanchez to make it, but it was absurd at times to hear Rex in post game rhapsodize about what a great job he did. For most of the season, Mark seemed much more realistic.
My guess is that Rex is a one-tool coach, pretty much like his father, and the little bit I’ve sen of his brother. The loudmouth side of him might lead him to build a tribe that worships just him, so he’ll defend ‘his guys’ like Smith and I fear Schotty et al to the bitter end, irrespective of perfrmance. I can just imagine him telling T or Woody ‘If he goes I go!’ Do you think that if the Jets let him go anyone would pick him up as a head coach? I really doubt it.

by crmorris on Jan 4, 2012 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New York Jets.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rackmultipart
GGN Thread About Nothing #18 Enter Sandman
545595_428600250485671_100000070982458_1739202_129649609_n_1_small
5 players that i expect to see improvement from this year
P3733056reg_small
Why will Aaron Maybin get 10-20 sacks this season.
Small
Do You Trust The Jets' Front Office?
Small
Diggin Dunbar Diggin the 46

Recent FanPosts

P3733056reg_small
My Life as a New York Jets Fan.
Small
Conner can run
Small
Thoughts on the upcoming season part 1: What to watch for
Small
Thoughts On the Upcoming Season Part 2: The season
Small
Thoughts On the Upcoming Season Part 3: Cleaning House
Small
The Peyton-Goes-Down Debacle Prequel, and the Best QB Some of You Never Heard Of.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Gangreen-large_small John B

Great-british-events-flag_small David_Wyatt

Staff Writers

Revis_island_small Bro Namath

943_small dvdvil

Wayne_chrebet1_small GangGreenMag

Haters_small bobdolethesnapplelady

Santana_moss_small Jeff W.

Moderators

Revis_christ_small Judgegavel

Return_of_the_jet-i_small MachlinT

Jimmy2_small Tamarack

Rackmultipart rexthejet