Potential Jets: Kareem McKenzie
I think one of Terry Bradway's biggest errors as general manager of the Jets was not finding a way to afford Kareem McKenzie. McKenzie was a very good right tackle for the Jets who signed with the Giants after the 2004 season at the young age of 26. Bradway thought converted tight end Adrian Jones could fill the void. He was wrong. It took the Jets three years until the signing of Damien Woody to adequately replace McKenzie.
McKenzie is now on the wrong side of 30. Would the Jets be wise to try and bring back the pending free agent. I am not so sure of that. While Kareem helped to lock down the right tackle spot for years for the Giants, there are real signs he is in deep decline. According to Pro Football Focus, McKenzie was beaten in pass protection to allow either a pressure, hit, or sack on 9.3% of plays in which he was a pass blocker this season. That is Wayne Hunter territory. He would probably cost more than Hunter because of his good reputation for past work.
How about run blocking? McKenzie was part of the blocking unit that helped the Giants rush for less yards than any other in the league. They only ran for 3.5 yards per carry. In fairness, the Giants were stronger running to McKenzie's right side, averaging 3.9 per run to that side and 4.1 off right tackle. That is not the indication of dominant run blocking, though.
While I think the Jets should have found a way to pay McKenzie back in 2005, bringing him back would be chasing the past. He is on the downside.
What do you think?
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Definitely not IMO. When I have watched the Giants this year, Kareem has looked absolutely terrible. On occasions he has been absolutely schooled. I honestly don’t see this as much of an upgrade over Hunter and that is saying something. He will be 33 when the season kicks off and his decline over the past two years is worrying. I’ll pass on this one.
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
Jets/Cubs/Norwich City FC/PSG
I'm really wondering who is gonna be our right tackle
doesn’t look like there are too many good free agents
I wanna say no, but I'll take whatever I can get to be perfectly honest
Arm chair GM. Mod/contributing writer at SBN Jets blog GGN.
GangGreenNation.com
There has to be something better, right?
There has to be. Now excuse me while I keep repeating that.
NO
we dont need another mid 30s player that will probably demand a good chunk of salary
"The message to the rest of the league is, hey, the Jets are coming, and we're going to give you everything we got. And I think that's going to be more than you can handle"
Nah
We better hope that we can coach someone up. That would like putting a band aid on a gunshot wound! But we do need help….
by flawed911 on Jan 29, 2012 2:15 PM EST via Android app reply actions
You're Gonna Base the Season on HOPE???
That’s what the Jets did last season. How did that work out exactly?
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years." Alexander Tyler
no no and no
young players please,no stop gap old players who want to make their last paycheck.
As a General Rule
I agree with you, but imo there’s no way the Jets can adequately address all of their needs in the draft, and there just aren’t the young developmental prospects in FA that are available and who the Jets could depend upon. Even if the Jets draft a young RT, we’ve learned from experience (or at least hopefully all have) that you HAVE to have experienced back ups on the OL. Rookies struggle and injuries are part of the game.
If they don’t sign a “stop gap” player at RT, how would you suggest the Jets address the RT starting spot and his backup???
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years." Alexander Tyler
I have a feeling Mike Adams may be the best way to go
Which means no first round pass rusher :(. Unless Vlad can somehow have an epiphany and become Damien Woody 2.0.
Is He the Long-Term Answer?
No, but I believe that at a minimum he would be solid insurance in case the rookie the Jets draft isn’t ready by opening day or in case Ducasse still isn’t ready. At a maximum, I think he would give the Jets solid play at RT for a year, maybe two if need be. If the rookie RT panned out and was ready to start by the opening week, McKenzie would be depth, and if Ferguson went down with a serious injury, the rookie would probably have to slide to LT and McKenzie could man the Jets would need some solid depth.
If there’s one thing that all Jets fans (and hopefully Rex and Tanny) should have learned from this past season, it’s that it’s not wise to enter a season without veteran depth on the OL. If Turner is back, he can backup C and OG, but at the very least, they need a solid, experienced OT to backup and more likely, start at RT.
Even if the Jets draft a RT in the first round, there’s no guarantee he won’t get injured or will be ready to start in week 1. McKenzie shouldn’t be all that expensive. He’s on the downside of his career. His play has tailed off a little. His contract could be structured with performance bonuses where if his play remained at a high level, he’d get paid more. That should serve as protection both for the Jets and motivation for McKenzie.
For all of those who voted no, I truly would like to know how you would address the RT spot.. If there’s another veteran out there as good as McKenzie and likely as cheap, who is it?
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years." Alexander Tyler
I would rather give Hunter another chance before this guy
Think about it this way, McKenzie looked terrible protecting an elite QB, how much worse will he look protecting the Sanchize?
Should you choose to test my resolve in this matter, you will be facing a finality beyond your comprehension, and you will not be counting days, or months, or years, but milleniums in a place with no doors.
I have some ideas, but y'all ain't gonna like them
I don’t think they’re that great myself. But instead of going after a FA guy clearly in decline,
we could:
1) keep what we have (Hunter/Ducasse/Howard) and use some of our later picks on good-but-not-great prospects in the late draft rounds
2) trade up, or for more early picks ,and draft a legit prospect higher than we should
3) wait until FA, the draft, and camps begin to cut down the herd for other teams and hope to grab someone another team loses in a numbers game
I told you you wouldn’t like them!
I actually think we could have a training camp competition of sorts
Kinda like they did with Slauson and Vlad after Faneca left. It’d be risky though.
You're Right! LOL
I haven’t given up on Ducasse, and don’t know Howard, but Hunter should be gone. They could use the cap space, he’s more of a finesse blocker, and is simply awful. Trading up is an AWFUL suggestion. It’s why the Jets have all the holes they do know. If Tanny trades up, I’m done with this team until he’s fired.
I like #3 the best. Even if they sign a FA OT, I think they need to draft a RT prospect somewhere in rounds 3-5. Hopefully, someone will shake free towards the end of TC.
I don’t watch the Giants. McKenzie may have been awful vs the pass rush, but according to stats at least did well in the rushing attack. He may bounce back in a different system, with a different coach, but maybe not. I just haven’t seen anyone on the FA list better unless it’s Gaither, and he probably would be more expensive.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years." Alexander Tyler
Kareem McKenzie
Get real, he is done. We need a legitamte upgrade that can last a couple of years.
I would rather
Winston Hill gave it another go before we go after McKenzie
Time to be creative.....
WE have an opportunity to look around in Free Agency at who is available. At first pass Mckenzenie is a no-go for me. I’m not sure if there is anybody else out there or not. I’m not sure if there are any FA Guards available as well. Someone in a different thread suggested moving Slauson to RT and either drafting or replacing by Free Agency a new LG. That’s being creative. Whether Slauson’s up to the job is another thing but first things first. We keep moving down the checklist and see where we get with our options. So if we find a respectable Guard in FA great, let’s move along. The Draft, a different view for us now. Its not going to be our 1st pick and probably not our 2nd. We’re probably looking somewhere in the vicinity of Rounds 3-5 and thinking later than earlier for a pick on the OL. WE’ll probably see a second pick at #6. So going to camp we should have at least 3 new guys + a # of UDFA’s to look at. That will leave us with all of camp to see what we’ve got and give us a clearer picture of where we are going for 2012. The last piece on the checklist is to look at league cutdowns and see if there are any names that jump out that could prove useful to our needs. That’s how I see our off-season going for 2012 on the OL. Oh..there’s one last option…doesn’t happen alot but is a possibility…Trade…..we make a play for another team’s OL’s.
"It's only through change we learn to grow".

by 


















