Potential Jets: Mario Manningham
Mario Manningham had a 944 yard, 9 touchdown season in 2009. He followed that up with 822 yards and 5 touchdowns in 2010. 2011 was a quieter year. He has battled a knee injury, which led to Victor Cruz getting starts in his place and turning into one of the top five receivers in the NFL. As a result, his spot on the totem pole dropped once he returned to the lineup.
It will be interesting to see how the Giants deal with their now number three receiver, who is set to become a free agent. Part of me wonders whether they will make an effort to retain Manningham to maintain the key cogs that comprise the strength of the team, the wide receivers. Another part of me wonders whether the Giants, knowing Hakeem Nicks and Cruz will need to be paid big in the future, look for a more economical option as their third receiver.
The Jets might come calling with an offer no other team can make, a chance for more playing time without forcing him to uproot himself. Manningham is a speedy, deep threat, playmaker type, the kind of guy who could make teams pay for focusing too much on Santonio Holmes. Manningham isn't overly physical. The word that seems to plague him is focus. He sometimes lacks it and runs sloppy routes or does not come up with catchable balls as a result. I still think he fits the criteria of what the Jets want across from Holmes, somebody with a history of production who can stretch the field.
Manningham probably will not be in much of a position to demand big money coming off an injury plagued season in which he dropped on the depth chart. He might be open to a one year prove it deal to try and pump up his value for another free agency run next year.
He would not be my first choice. I think Braylon Edwards brings more to the table and will be more affordable. I would not upset if the Jets grabbed Manningham, though.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To be honest
I feel like he is the same type of receiver as Tone. I feel like we need a bigger taller guy who can also get down field to help compliment Tone.
by RevisIsland&Alcrotraz on Jan 28, 2012 3:37 PM EST reply actions
He could be what we need from a $$$ stand point
Give him a physical, MAKE SURE HE IS HEALTHY, and sign him cheap…and we can still get edwards back if he is also healthy.
Consider this…edwards, Holmes, manningham, Kerley and keller. That is a lot of WRs but with the exception of Holmes ALL OF THEM ARE FINAINCIALLY OBTAINABLE at the same time….so even with all 4+1 we are still not going broke and have cap space to do other big things
Looks like we're...
with Santonio for the long haul, I really liked what I saw from Kerley and I’ve been on the Bring Braylon Bandwagon for a while now. So sum this all up…no.
Off topic
But can someone put up a thread for the Senior Bowl?
Oh yes that's right, I'm a Jets fan.
by Bob_The_Friendly_Baker on Jan 28, 2012 3:52 PM EST reply actions
curry just put in pressure on brandon weeden which forced a pick
Just throwing that out there.
I like Manningham, think he would be a nice fit.
But if we’re gonna go poaching Giants, I’d like to snatch up Kiwi or Osi.
by Crackback on Jan 28, 2012 4:31 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Osi is getting old and he seems to be injured too much for my taste
Love with a LEO is like a drug.. One taste and your addicted!
I think Osi can be a beast in any scheme.
I think he is the best natural pass rusher out there
Let's Make sure we play like the f***in NEW YORK JETS
and not some f***in slapd**k team!
by jets4life24 on Jan 28, 2012 4:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I wouldn't mind
but i’d rather have braylon back, manningham is another new receiver that mark has to learn
neither is going to command a high payday
Why not both? Both comming off injuries, both playing for auditions, and probably not many offers…and maybe a hometown discout Man wont have to pack up and braylon “wants” to come back
..Potential risk with 4 + 1 receivers.....
Well it sounds really attractive at the outset having 4 pretty good WR targets for Sanchez to pass the ball to. The reality is only one can catch it at a time. There is going to be the risk of someone(s) “bitchin about not gettin the ball”. The 1st guy in that parade will be Holmes and Manningham will be right behind him. Its something we just don’t need. Especially if we are directing our Offence back to a Run first and Ball Control strategy.
"It's only through change we learn to grow".
by Canadian Jet on Jan 29, 2012 3:39 AM EST up reply actions
I don't like Manningham
He drops too much and has injury issues. Plus I don’t think he gives us enough to be our #2. I’d rather just start Kerley
My list of Potential #2s for the Jets this year:
Braylon
Robert Meachum
Alshon Jeffery
Nick Toon
Otherwise just promote Kerley or maybe get Jerricho back and put him at the 2
Do the Shumpty Shump, come on and do the Shumpty Shump
No to Manningham!
His hands are terrible, quits on routes and and comes off as soft. I would give Kerley the go and shoot for Braylon back. Braylon, Holmes, Kerley and Keller!
by flawed911 on Jan 28, 2012 5:00 PM EST via Android app reply actions
I like Manningham, but would prefer Braylon...
especially if cheaper, which he should be.
founding member of PACOS (People Against the Constant Overuse of Sarcastic font)
GGN-Moderator
I've been a fan of his since his Michigan days
He’s always been frustrating with his concentration issues given how he is so tremendously talented. He’s probably one of the most natural wide receivers out there. He’s basically Santonio Holmes without quite the success so far. While it could be interesting fielding a starting group with Holmes, Manningham and Kerley… Well, actually as I type it it sounds pretty awesome. Defending them, plus Keller and McKnight!!! Holy s***!!!! That could be pretty damn scary! Of course, Holmes and Manningham will run hot and cold. Better hope the cold days don’t happen simultaneously.
by Exystence on Jan 28, 2012 5:43 PM EST via mobile reply actions
To me Manningham is the least talented of the Giants receiving set
I wouldn’t be disappointed when I think about it, but I’d really like a different sort of receiver opposite Holmes. Braylon should be so incredibly cheap relatively speaking that we can sign another receiver in case he really sucks.
Arm chair GM. Mod/contributing writer at SBN Jets blog GGN.
GangGreenNation.com
well
if we can’t get braylon, i’d go for manningham. he will be cheap, and he’s a deep threat/speedy-ish player. him plus a physical wr in the draft will be great
"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.
I Vote No
IMO the Jets have greater needs in FA than Mario Manningham. He’s turned into a pretty solid #2 or #3 WR, but the Jets currently have both those spots. They don’t have a true #1. I’d rather bring back Braylon if the Jets have FA $s to burn on a WR.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years." Alexander Tyler
well
if we can’t get braylon, i think he could be a good cheap option
"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.
I'm Not So Sure He'll Be That Cheap
He’s put up some pretty solid numbers over tte last several seasons. Lots of teams need WRs. I don’t think the Jets even have the money to think about signing a FA WR unless they can’t sign a FA and/or S. If they do sign him, I hope there’s a performance clause that subtracts money for every dropped pass.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years." Alexander Tyler
maybe we can bring him in and get rid of Santonio? Get rid of the cancer.
bleed green and white
by greenandwhite4ever on Jan 29, 2012 10:45 AM EST reply actions

by 


















