Taking A Look At Sanchez's Situational Stats
Following last weeks comeback, it felt like Mark Sanchez has done his come from behind magic time and time again. I was curious to see how he did in the 4th Quarter as compared to the rest of the game. In 8 of his 32 career games he has lead either a 4th Quarter comeback or the game winning drive. But I was rather surprised when I took a look at his situational numbers. Over his career the 4th Quarter has been the worst Quarter for Sanchez by far. His QB rating is 50.3, nearly 18 points worse then his next bad quarter, the first. He's only thrown 4 TDs in the 4th compared to 13 INTs.
Now my immediate thought was that Sanchez probably throws more out of desperation in the 4th with the game normally on the line. But his 227 attempts is right in the middle when it comes down to breaking his attempts down by quarter. How does his 4th Quarter QB Rating compare to other QBs around the league? Kyle Orton's is at 88.4 (16 TD to 8 INT), Tony Romo's is at 100 (34 to 17) Jason Campbell's is 81.2 (19 to 13) Chad Henne's is 62.9 (9 to 16) David Carr is 71.3 (23 to 26). That's a pretty good mix of QBs who are mostly considered average at best, have played for bad teams or are considered choke artists. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Sanchez has one of the worst QB Ratings in the fourth.
Half of Sanchez's 34 INTs have come while the team has been trailing. But he has also thrown 19 of his 31 TDs while the team is behind. He also averages nearly 2 more yards per pass. Amazingly while ahead Sanchez's TD to INTs are 9 to 7. Inexplicably when the game is tied he's thrown 10 INTs on 164 attempts to only 3 TDs. When you break down his stats just to each half, the numbers are nearly identical in every category, until you get to INTs. He's thrown 15 first half TDs and 16 second half TDs, but 11 first half INTs compared to 23 second half INTs. This is with only a difference of ten attempts between both halfs.
On the bright side Sanchez has improved. In his first season he threw 9 INTs in the 4th compared to only 4 last year. But he still struggled last year in the 4th in general. Although he did have his highest number of attempts last year in the 4th (143 compared to 141 in the first) he had his worst competition percentage at 46.2. Last season he also did better when the team was trailing, throwing 8 TDs to 8 INTs. This was while he threw 100 more times when ahead and 160 more times then when the team was tied.
And Over 6 Yards To Go
Now this bit of an anomaly looks like it can be blamed on coaching more then Sanchez. On 1st, 2nd and 3rd down and more then 6 yards to go when Sanchez throws there seems to be a gamblers mentality. On 1st and greater then 6 he's 157 for 262 for 2120 yards with 7 TDs to 8 INTs while posting a 81.9 QB Rating. On 2nd and greater then 6 he's 156 for 267 for 1774 yards with 8 TDs to 11 INTs and a 71.3 QB Rating. On 3rd and greater then 6 he's 96 for 196 for 1251 yards with 6 TDs to 11 INTs and a 56.3 QB Rating. 3 of his INTs came from when the Jets had 2nd down and more then 11 yards, while another 6 came from when the Jets had 3rd down and more then 11. He also has no TDs when the Jets have more then 11 yards to go and has a total of 11 INTs in those situations.
Last year though the Jets only threw 64 times when they had more then 11 yards to go and Sanchez only threw 4 picks, with 3 of them being on 3rd and more then 11 to go. In 2009 he threw 52 times with more then 11 to go and put up 7 INTs. Interestingly Sanchez has the best QB rating on first down, which isn't surprising for a run first team. He has a 80.9 QBR, throwing 159 completions on 267 attempts for 2129 yards with 8 TDs to 9 INTs. But he has more TDs on 2nd down as he is 185 for 327 with 2047 yards and 13 TDs to 13 INTs for a 72.0 QBR.
Comparing his rookie season to his sophmore season, there's definitely some growth. It is rare the QB that doesn't struggle on 3rd and long. Even Peyton Manning's QB rating drops to a 61.6 on 3rd and 11+ to go. It is interesting though what you can see and gleam from the stats when your thinking one thing (that Sanchez has been a great 4th Quarter QB) and the stats tell you something different (he's not).
30 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The thing I've noticed in looking at Sanchez 2010 splits
He is as accurate as anyone else with the long ball – that is to say, not very accurate with the long ball just like everyone else. He also seems to take more shots down the field then other guys.
But his accuracy is bad on the passes of 1-10 yards. He’s 59% in that area where guys like Brady and Rodgers are over 70%. Still though, that is really just one or two extra bad throws per game for Sanchez. Very fixable through.
I found it interesting in the splits, and I forgot to mention it, is that he’s incredibly awful when throwing to his left.
I tried to keep away from comparing his numbers to top guys in the league ala Brady and Rodgers though, it’s not a fair comparison.
"Failing upwards! How come I can’t ever seem to do that?" - AP77 on Strang's ESPN Job
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
Correct, in his rookie season
Corrected last year.
by CervezaVerde on Sep 17, 2011 4:07 AM EDT up reply actions
The best stat to determine how good Sanchez is...
Win-Loss split. It gets even better in the playoffs.
+100
I hate all the other (of what becomes simply) meaning less stats, does he win games is the bottom line, and so far the answers yes.
founding member of PACOS (People Against the Constant Overuse of Sarcastic font)
GGN-Moderator
I Have to Disagree
Those stats aren’t meaningless. They tell the tale of why the offense has struggled. As some Schotty defenders suggest, they may also tell the tale of why Schotty’s play calling is so awful. He has to improve on those stats. What’s amazing is that he has made enough plays to help the team win. Those improvements need to continue.
"Reality is purely the perception of the individual mind. It follows, that since no two minds are alike, no two perceptions of reality are alike. It further follows, that what reality is to one, may seem complete madness to someone else."
– Yefim Novikov
I really hate looking at numbers
A lot of time they do lie. I believe Sanchez could had played better in the forth, but if you look at what really happen, he didn’t play that bad. He was 26 for 39, hen missed his last five passes to finish 26-44. Two of those passes were drops. One by LDT, and the other by Plaxico (I believe Plax should had caught that pass, but the defender may had hit the ball). He had a touchdown to Mason, but Mason lost his footing. Even though his nest pass was a TD, its still counts as another incompletion if you are stuck on stats. While this is an interesting read, I’ll let my eyes judge how Sanchez play, and I feel he played good enough for the Jets to win. He didn’t win the game, but he didn’t lose the game for them too.
I do admit the pass that was almost intercepted was stupid by Sanchez. He has to understand that teams are desperate in that situation and will take chances to try to get the ball back. With no safety help a pump fake and then throw might had been a TD.
Overall,
I just think he needs to get better. Once we’re winning more games because of him rather than in spite of him, I’ll be a little more comfortable during the season.
We haven’t won in spite of him since 09. Not so sure we did back then either. Generally, when he plays bad we lose.
And this isn’t so much directed at u personally, but I’m kinda sick of the notion that the team carries the kid. He’s a winner. He makes plays that wins games. And he’s won a lot more than other QBs that get more acclaim. Romo has been on a bunch of good teams. So has Flacco and Matt Ryan. How many of gone on the post-season runs that Sanchez has? How about Phil River? He’s been on a bunch of teams loaded with talent too. Has he made as many plays in the big spot as Sanchez? Hell no.
Its not about yards and completion percentage. Its about doing it when it counts. Sanchez does it when it counts.
by Crackback on Sep 17, 2011 1:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I really could not agree with you more
Quarterbacks are not paid to put up gorgeous stats, they are paid to win football games, and that’s what he does. He always brings his best when we need it most and how rare is it for a young QB specifically to do best when the lights are brightest and the pressure is turned up the most, and he does that as well. It seems to me that more emphasis is put on the regular season than the playoffs. It almost seems like if you aren’t putting up monster numbers in the regular season, what you do in the playoffs does not matter ,and I find that to be absurd. The Jets don’t win in spite of him at all and it’s utter nonsense to say otherwise especially now.
Gorgeous Stats
are not the end in themselves, but they quite often are the means to the end of winning the game. The incompletions and TOS kill drives and take points off the board, and make it easier for other teams to put points on the board. Don’t get me wrong. I love the strength of his arm, his work ethic, character, desire to win, leadership, and the ways he has come through in the pinch. I want to see his accuracy, decision making, and reading of Ds continue to improve. I didn’t get to see much of the game today, but saw him make some amazing passes, fitting the ball into very tight spaces. That is encouraging. His decision making on the picks, is another matter, but overall he shows improvement.
I’m actually much more worried about the OL getting Sanchez killed.
"Reality is purely the perception of the individual mind. It follows, that since no two minds are alike, no two perceptions of reality are alike. It further follows, that what reality is to one, may seem complete madness to someone else."
– Yefim Novikov
I respect Sanchez's ability to bounce back from criticism...
…but to say that he led the game winning drive or 4th quarter comeback against the Cowboys is an insult to the Jets’ defense and special teams. They were the reason the Jets won the game.
I did
and so did Football Reference
"Failing upwards! How come I can’t ever seem to do that?" - AP77 on Strang's ESPN Job
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
I'm confuse, you said Sanchez led a forth quarter comeback?
What game you was watching. Sanchez led a TD drive but did nothing else that game in the forth, including not moving the ball when Revis got his interception..
I’m saying it’s listed as such on Pro-Football Reference, so I’m just repeating it from there. Technically he did.
"Failing upwards! How come I can’t ever seem to do that?" - AP77 on Strang's ESPN Job
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
i have to agree
sanchez could of got us a little closer, no one would say you can trust nick folk with a 50 yarder, let alone a 30 yarder
"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
The defense did not...
ST and Romo did, the defense did not play well enough to get any credit there.
founding member of PACOS (People Against the Constant Overuse of Sarcastic font)
GGN-Moderator
Revis' interception did nothing?
The forced fumble on the goal line? The near 3-and-out? Forced fumble to end the game?
They were pretty clutch in the 4th quarter, if you ask me, whether or not a lot of blame goes to Romo.
by Richard Hill on Sep 20, 2011 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
As long as
someone is stepping up (see nick folk, joe mcknight, darelle revis) we can win games. I think too much is focused on the way sanchez plays. Yes-he can’t screw it up for us but he hasnt done anything like that as of late.
I did
Point out a few times that his numbers were better Year 2 Vs Year 1, but in fairness his receivers were also better,
"Failing upwards! How come I can’t ever seem to do that?" - AP77 on Strang's ESPN Job
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
True say but he also grew in the leadership
area especially in clutch situations (see jets vs texans!) which is a key ‘situational stat’!!
whats with all the socks lately?
Arm chair GM. Mod/contributing writer at SBN Jets blog GGN.
Archduke of PACOS.
GangGreenNation.com
hmm?
Sockpuppets?
"Failing upwards! How come I can’t ever seem to do that?" - AP77 on Strang's ESPN Job
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
Yes
people aren’t even bothering to register e-mails or accounts with different names than their last ones. The reason I ask is because several of these “new members” are just old ones, who accounts were in good standing.
If they think that I don’t notice, or that they can filibuster of sorts with features like the rec and things, they are sorely mistaken.
Arm chair GM. Mod/contributing writer at SBN Jets blog GGN.
Archduke of PACOS.
GangGreenNation.com
Funny that some people would be that obsessed.
"Failing upwards! How come I can’t ever seem to do that?" - AP77 on Strang's ESPN Job
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.
Dang, pissed I missed this one.
Seems like it was the DK-Cro show.
Great Article
Very interesting and revealing stats. Thanks for the research and work! rec’d
"Reality is purely the perception of the individual mind. It follows, that since no two minds are alike, no two perceptions of reality are alike. It further follows, that what reality is to one, may seem complete madness to someone else."
– Yefim Novikov

by 





















