An Offensive Coordinator Scouts Big Name Receivers
Clark Judge of CBS Sports spoke with an offensive coordinator who broke down pros and cons of signing three big name veteran receivers, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Plaxico Burress.
In fact, you don't know if you should choose any of them. So where do you go?
I posed that question to an offensive coordinator I respect, someone who coached with and against these guys for years, and I asked if he could help by deconstructing each in a loose scouting report.
He said he could ... and he did.
Give this a read. I agree with most of what the coordinator said. I only have a few areas where I disagree.
The first is with Moss. While he clearly has been a locker room problem for his refusal to play hard in spots, there have also been seasons where he has been a great presence like 1998 and 2007. These were seasons where he was motivated by people doubting he could make a positive impact. Based on what happened a year ago, 2011 could be another prove it year. That is why he is my first choice of the three.
The second area I disagree with the coordinator is that Burress would be the easiest to dump. Any of them would be easy to dump. Ownes has had to settle for one year deals the past two seasons. With his baggage and hitting 37 years old, it is tough to imagine any team giving him a multi year deal when none has recently. Moss' 2010 season also indicates he will only get a cheap one year deal, and two teams did cut him loose easily last year.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ok, I’ll be the first to as it…HELL NO TO MOSS! We don’t have a pass heavy attack. We are, and even when Sanchez develops, a run first team . It’s what Rex wants. This along with the fact that even if we only sign Bray or Holmes we have several pass catching options, means Moss won’t get the ball as much as he wants. And when he doesn’t get the ball he is a disruption. He will take plays off and he will not block on run plays.
I don’t want either of the three. Two are head cases and one hasn’t played in two years.
by JETSons on Jun 10, 2011 12:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
If I had to pick one it would be Burress, but if we have to get any of them then something went horribly wrong.
by Exystence on Jun 10, 2011 4:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Burress only cause he's a low risk, potential medium reward.
And the home of the .... JETS!!!
Now lets get a G-D snack!!!

by 




















