Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Truth vs. Myth Perception of 3rd Year QB's. Are we too quick to judge Sanchez?

I remember coming into this season hearing all the talk from commentators about Sanchez taking his second step. Although I was and still am very high on Sanchez, I seriously doubted given the circumstances he was in (Oline, new WR's, bad OC, shortened pre-season) that Sanchez was going to light it up this year. Through 10 game so far, hes thrown 14 TDs and rushed for an additional 3. At this rate, he should have more total TD's than any Jets QB since Vinny Testaverde when he threw for 29 TDs in 1998. No matter how you may look at it, this is massive improvement at the QB position over what we have had in the past 15 seasons.

Now, I wish I could put something good together but I'm currently busy for the next week or so. What I want to tackle however is the perception that 3rd year QBs are suppossed to turn a corner. I decided to go check myself if the stats even back up this statement and I'm surprised to find out that such a statement is nothing more than stupid talking points perpetuated by NFL analysts. Below is a list of notable NFL QB's and their stats in their 3rd seasons.

3rd season on NFL QB's:

Drew Brees -  Rating: 67.5 Completion: 57.6%  Passing: 2,108 TD/INT - 11/15 (2003) 

Brees had an atrocious year in 2003. The Chargers were the worst team in the NFL that year. The very next year with an almost similar team (except with the addition of Gates) Brees produced a career year.

Phillip Rivers - Rating: 92.0 Completion: 61.7% Passing: 3125 TD/INT - 21/15 (2006)

Rivers inherited a great team that would come close to making it to the Super Bowl. LT put up the greatest year by any RB and Gates was just as special at TE. Overall this was a good year by Rivers in his 3rd NFL season when he made his first start.

Aaron Rodgers - Rating: 106.0 Completion: 71.4 Passng: 218 TD/INT - 1/0 (2007) 

Rodgers played two games in his third year. He barely played as Brett Favre backup and never really had an opportunity to show what he could do.

Eli Manning - Rating: 77.0 Completion: 57.7 Passing: 3244 TD/INT - 24/18 (2006) 

Manning's 3rd year wasn't great, as a matter a fact his numbers look like what Sanchez is set to put up at the end of the season. If you remember, Manning in his 3rd year had Tiki Barber light it up with over 2,000 yards from scrimmage. Its safe to say Sanchez has never gotten that type of help from Greene or LT. Also important to note Plaxico and Toomer were peaking in 2006 and Manning had a great Pro Bowl line along with Jeremy Shockey

Peyton Manning - Rating: 94.7 Completion: 62.5 Passing: 4413 TD/INT - 33/15 (2000) 

This was an amazing year by Peyton but it is easy to forget that the following season (4th year) Manning led the league in INTs and the Colts missed the post season. This was the same year Jim Mora had his epic rant about the Colts missing the playoffs and Manning throwing too many pick 6's.

Donovan McNabb - Rating: 84.3 Completion: 57.8% Passing: 3233 TD/INT: 25/12 (2001)

Good numbers by McNabb overall but not great. Also factor in he had a lot of rushing yards that same season. The Eagles made it to the NFC Championship that season under McNabb. Needless to say touchdown wise this was McNabbs 2nd best season EVER. Which goes to show up and down his career was. McNabb did get a lot of criticism in Philly though. 

Jay Cutler - Rating: 86.0 Completion: 62.3% Passing: 4526 TD/INT: 25/18 (2008)

Although his rating wasn't great Cutler had some pretty gaudy numbers in his 3rd season. Brandon Marshall had a lot to do with his 4,500 yards but its important to consider Cutler had over 600 passing attempts in 2008. This was a great 3rd season by Cutler but he followed this one off with a 76.8 rating in his first season with Chicago while leading the NFL in interceptions.

Ben Roethlisberger - Rating: 75.4 Completion: 59.7 Passing: 3513 TD/INT: 18/23 (2006)

After winning the Super Bowl and an off season motorcycle crash Big Ben had a horrible season. He was one of the league leaders in INTs. The 2006 Steelers were the first team not to reach the playoffs after winning the Super Bowl. Big Ben had a major hand in that. 

Carson Palmer - Rating: 101.1 Completion: 67.8 Passing: 3836 TD/INT: 32/13 (2005) 

This was by far the best year Carson ever put up in the NFL. This was also one of the best years any QB has had in recent memory. Carson came close to putting up similar numbers in 2006 but injuries set him back and he was never the same. Those Bengals teams were offensive oriented and relied on guys like Rudi Johnson, Chris Henry, Chad Johnson, and TJ Houshmanzadeh to make plays. That team was stacked and it really helped Palmer who also had a great line.

Tom Brady - Rating: 85.7 Completion: 62.1 Passing: 3764  TD/INT: 28/14 (2002)

These were good numbers by Brady but 2002 still remains the only year he was the starting QB for the Patriots and missed the playoffs. In comparison to the numbers Brady puts up these days it is nothing special, but Brady had a pretty serviceable season for that Patriots team. 

 

 

Does not count: Aaron Rodgers

Terrible 3rd years: Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger

Average 3rd year: Eli Manning

Good 3rd year: Donovan McNabb, Phillip Rivers, Jay Cutler, Tom Brady

Amazing 3rd years: Peyton Manning, Carson Palmer

In total as many QBs had terrible seasons as they had amazing seasons. Both Drew Brees and Ben Roethlisberger would recover to put MVP-like numbers and win the Super Bowl. Eli Manning who had an average year in 2006 won the Super Bowl the following season despite having a lower rating in 2007. Eli Manning didn't finish a season with a rating above 80 until his 5th season! Phillip Rivers continued to put up decent numbers while being supported by a great OC and an even better offense arround him. Both McNabb and Cutler have struggled to put up the numbers they put up their 3rd seasons. McNabb would have a great 2004 with Terrel Owens and thats the closest hes come to repeating his numbers in 2001. Peyton Manning led the league in INTs after his 3rd season but recovered to be a perennial MVP candidate. The same could not be said about Palmer who would never put up amazing stats like he did in his 3rd season.

I know I didn't include Flacco and Ryan but I want to give those guys time before I evaluate them. They both put up similar numbers last year but there is no question that the two regressed this season. 

Basically what I want to say is, judging QB's based off their 3rd season is a crapshoot. You'll be lucky to be right in most of these cases. Just let time pass and allow Sanchez to develop before people start posting Peyton Manning or Andrew Luck trades. 

Comment 100 comments  |  15 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thank you

And That Is a JET FIRST DOWN!!!
No This is Patrick...

by JetsFanMurphy on Nov 19, 2011 6:02 PM EST reply actions  

Wow, great post. Rec'd

This is a nice sober perspective. And, admittedly, has made me re-think things on Sanchez. I jumped off the boat in the immediate after-math of the Broncos game, which was heavily influenced by his poor performance against the Pats. But I think its time to take a step back, take a deep breath, and re-assess the kid. Your analysis makes a lot of sense. And Mark has faced some tough challenges this year. And he has improved more than he’s given credit for.

by Crackback on Nov 19, 2011 6:11 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Sorry the spelling mistakes and grammatical errors

I didn’t really proofread this but I wanted to put this thing together because it seems like the fanbase has been in panic mode.

I wanted to include HOF QB’s numbers as well if I had the time. But if you wish to, take a look at Troy Aikman, Brett Favre and John Elway in their 3rd seasons. They were all average or atrocious depending on how you look at it. Both Elway and Favre were interception machines.

Might as well stick with Sanchez in give him time rather than rebuild every 3 years. I don’t know a single Giants fan that gave up on Manning despite his struggles. It seems like if nothing is going our way we always choose to look elsewhere.

Also, Sanchez in his career isn’t any worse than Freeman or Stafford. Stafford has had the injuries but his game against the Lions last week serves as an example of what he is capable of. Stafford also had more INTs his rookie year than Sanchez. Freeman has more INTs than career starts. Something tells me Freeman’s efficient season last year was an aberration.

by Izzy76 on Nov 19, 2011 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

Ha Don't worry about the mistakes

Everyone makes them….unless you have an English major then there is a problem lol

This is what I’ve believed since we drafted the kid, we need to groom him and give him time. Great teams don’t just appear out of nowhere. When Tom Landry took over the Boys, they gave him over 20 years to groom a winner.

And That Is a JET FIRST DOWN!!!
No This is Patrick...

by JetsFanMurphy on Nov 19, 2011 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Last thing I want...

Is a Reid/McNabb type era with the Jets. The shortcomings of those Eagles teams was that they were never really great. The 2009 and 2010 Jets were good teams but nothing amazing. The Eagles during those early years did nothing to strengthen their team and were rather content with what they had. Instead of building a strong team around McNabb they just banked on the fact that McNabb would improve with the team he already had and make the players around him better.

This went on for a decade and Reid this year went into panic mode because his job was on the line and was very aggressive in improving the team. He put little or not effort in ensuring Michael Vick would be protected by his O-line.

by Izzy76 on Nov 19, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you

this should be front paged. i hope everyone on this site reads this. i was thinking about this too, i was just to lazy to write it. great job and rec’d

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 19, 2011 7:27 PM EST reply actions  

Thank You for the great post

I’m tired of people calling for Andrew Luck or Peyton Manning to coming in and take over. I know it’s frustrating, but it’s important for us to be patient and wait for Sanchez to develop into a pro QB.

"Burress telling Cason to hold his dick 3 times was awesome" -J-Nasty

by MDGeekyGrl on Nov 19, 2011 7:37 PM EST reply actions  

Wait how long? First it was “come on he’s only a rookie”. Then it was “Give him time, it’s only his second year. He’ll develop.” This year was the year he takes the next step, as evidenced by the spread offense implemented by the coaches, and quickly abandoned after the catastrophic results. How long do we keep making excuses for this guy? How many f’ing years does it take to develop??

And this argument is irrelevant IMO, because there are multiple QB’s on this list who won the goddamned Superbowl before posting the stats presented. Of course they were worth keeping! And ALL of them have taken over a game and won it themselves, something Sanchez has never done. Why are fans so loyal to a QB who can’t win without an exceptional running game?

by nationalist88 on Nov 19, 2011 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

*Sigh*
And this argument is irrelevant IMO, because there are multiple QB’s on this list who won the goddamned Superbowl before posting the stats presented.

What QB are you referring to?
Ben won in his 2nd year and posted the worst QB rating ever in a Superbowl
Way back in Brady’s 3rd year the Pats weren’t running up the score like they are now, he had a great defense and he wasn’t handicapped by an inept OC.
Peyton had okay stats but it took him 8 or 9 years to finally make it to the Superbowl.

I can’t think of any other QB on that list who has won a Superbowl during their first 3 years in the NFL.
There used to be a time when quarterbacks were given time to grow into their job but now it seems like we are all very impatient. Maybe it’s the predictions Rex has made the last 3 years or maybe it’s just a sign of the times. I just think we need to give the guy more time to develop.

"Burress telling Cason to hold his dick 3 times was awesome" -J-Nasty

by MDGeekyGrl on Nov 19, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Mark Sanchez took over several games and won them himself last year. Or are we going to start just give the receivers the credit for his wins and him the blame for his losses?

by SioneBAAOOOHA on Nov 19, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Please tell me which game Mark Sanchez won by himself. In any year.

by nationalist88 on Nov 20, 2011 2:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Week 2, 2010, @ Miami 2010, ect.

And often this year he looks like the only one playing

by NYJALLFINGDAY on Nov 20, 2011 3:59 AM EST up reply actions  

You gotta be kidding. I assume you meant the Week 3 game @ Miami in 2010. Why, because it’s one of the few career outs that he managed 3 TD’s in one game? Thank Braylon Edwards for that and his YAC, which accounted for the lion’s share of Sanchez’s pass yards, including an out route he ran 67 yards up the sideline.

But you can’t say he won it by himself (what with his 53% completion rate) when we ran the ball 30 times with a 5.0 YD AVG.

by nationalist88 on Nov 22, 2011 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sorry, but can you define ‘by himself’? Because there were six regular season games last year where he led game-winning drives in the 4th quarter and that’s not counting the playoff game against the Colts or the win against the Pats; the first of which he took over in the 4th quarter and the second of which he outplayed Brady with early domination that led to the Jets win.

by SioneBAAOOOHA on Nov 20, 2011 5:00 AM EST up reply actions  

sioneBAA

Ok, I think what the other person is trying to say is that,this yr the OL,doesnt have nor does it show FULL support towards Sanchez…Look a QB can be the Most Gifted Player on the Field BUT if His OL doesnt give him the Time to perform to His abilities,then we have seen those results the past 2 -games!!!..also can be said about his “Weapons”..When the FULL JETS Off Team plays as a TEAM,we have seen the results..But lately we are not seeing them!!!

When Sanchez calls out that “Kill-KIll” @ the line,he is Now taking full responsibility for that PLAY!!!.not the “OC”,yet when play falter;s everyone quick to blame the OC.

Look, All Head Coach;s during the Game Have full Power;s to over-ride plays being called-in,so WE dont know if REX isnt changing the plays called-in during certain downs!!!..All the other Coach;s are REX;s assit’;s…HE still has the final say!!!!!

BUT as a Head Coach You can;t basically throw ur QB under the BUS ,2 times as He did during and after the NE Game!!!.#1 His comment to the reporter on calling that T/O!! #2 post game when asked about NE;s going 80 yards in under 90sec;s,REX said that is WHAT HAPPENS when UR playing Agaisnt a ELITE QB!!! if anything that comment alone can HURT any teams QB!!!!

Now REX is saying He Backs his QB…that too me sounds like a Coach trying to amend HIS Own ERROR;S and Faults!!!..

..also “Sione” explain this one..after BOTH Games AGAINST NE, the DEF. PLayers have come -out and said they Didnt have the RIGHT People on the Field!!!..REX calls ALL def signals!!!!!…so I am saying the JETS Problems Begin with REX!!!!!!.He is the One that Controls How players are brought along…The Other COACH;S follow HIS guide-lines..

everyone saying fire the OC…ok fire Him and lets say Next OC calls the plays and Still Sanchez falters? is it that NEW OC fault or Maybe REX;S?….

I agree with the other poster in that Sanchez can not manage a game!!.at least NOT Now with a OL that has no faith in HIM!!!.if they did they wouldnt have allowed 8 sacks in past 2 games!!!!

also HIS pick-6’s are not the OC;s fault;s..Sanchez even admitted after the Denver Game that HIS REC was well “covered” YET HE STILL THREW TO HIM WHY?

the pass to LT in the NE game LT was in wrong position to even try catching it YET he still threw it why?..and on the 1st interception in the NE Game He threw that 10yard pass with enough force that it bounched off 2 players b/4 getting Intercepted!!!…Too Me Sanchez has failed in His throws,at times he throws with too much force other times he FLOATS the ball…which all breaks down too HIS Mechanics,the direct results of BOTH the QB Coach. and Back-up QB who are suppose too be TEACHING HIM!!!!

Sanchez in my own views Has No TRUE pocket presence!!!!.what games he did play at USC he didnt have it there either!!!!..

Here is a good example “Sione”.couple yrs back BRADY went down in came a QB who #1 never Started a single game in HIS life.He goes what 11-5,everyone thought here was a QB on the rise! well what has he seriously done with KC?.nothing!!!!

what MADE him was the PLAYERS both on OF and DF believed in HIM!!!

Sanchez right now in my opinions doesnt have Both sides of the “BALL” believing In HIM!!!…Def stops a Team.in comes Sanchez and lately what has happened..#1 a sack..#2 a pick-6..#3 throwing to rec;s well covered..then DEF back again on field!!!

Sanchez also fails to say as ALL other Leaders on a team say after a Win or a LOST..IT was the WHOLE TEAM!!..but we all get to read his Comments that HE FAILED!!.how does he come up with saying HE FAILED when HIS DEF didnt stop Tebow?…But when a OF. can only score in a game via a OL quick thinkings to land on that fumble.then JETS whole OFF LINE has major issues…

Sanchez; failures to READ a DEF is what is costing the Jets that long-ball..also Sanchez other failure is Once He LOCKS onto a certain REC. he doesnt check-off to his "other rec;s!!!!!.thats ALL on Sanchez failures..He can not read the plays or make Adjustments during a play!!!!

by Jack2466 on Nov 21, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Seriously?

This might be the first time that I have seen a QB get blamed for taking too much responsibility for losing.

by square1 on Nov 22, 2011 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Nationalist...calm down dude

you remind me of the crazy Jets fans calling 1050 ESPN acting like the world is ending

"Some things you just can't question. Like you can't question why two plus two is four. So don't question it, don't try to look it up. I don't know who made it, all I know is it was put in my head that two plus two is four. So certain things happen. Why does it rain? Why am I so sexy? I don't know." - Shaquille O'Neal

by CinnamonToastCrunch on Dec 2, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Look up and down the stats. The completion percentages of most of these QBs range around 57-62%

Aside from Carson Palmer who completed 67% of his passes in 2005 (his career high by three percentage points) every QB completed between 57-62% of their passes. Looks like Sanchez is right on schedule. Hes sitting at 57.1% and without the Ravens game which was a complete mess it would be at 60% exactly.

I just get annoyed when ESPN analysts keep on stressing Sanchez can’t even reach 60% and you can only be considered legitimate if you reach that number. Big Ben, Eli, Brees and McNabb didn’t reach 60 in their 3rd years. Why is the criticism of Sanchez so much more profound. And you can’t even use the media markets. McNabb is in Philly, Big Ben plays in Pittsburgh and Eli plays for THE team in NY (sorry Jets fans but Giants own this city if you read the papers) and none of them receive the flack Sanchez does.

I think a lot of it deals with the primetime games. For some reason the NFL schedules primetime games that are bad matchups for Sanchez. Mark has 3 pick 6’s this year, (Cowboys, Broncos and Pats) and all of them came in primetime games. His 33% completion percentage against the Ravens was his worst game this year by far. Last year against the Ravens on primetime he was just as bad. Seems like the NFL catches Sanchez at the wrong times. The most INTs hes thrown this year in a game is 2. Vick, Brady, Stafford and Eli have all had worse games.

Also, the Giants lost to the Seahawks earlier this year and weren’t even crucified by the media. Jets lose on the road, in a short week, in the high altitude of Denver to an unconventional offense without two of their running backs and they are frauds while Sanchez is not legit. Kind of crazy I’ve been reading all of this shit from columnists stating they’d rather have Tebow than Sanchez at this point because Tebow is a proven winner with intangible talent. Did these writers not see the stats during the end of the game saying Sanchez has the most 4th quarter comebacks in the NFL since last year. Did they not see Sanchez win 4 road playoff games two of them to HOF QBs.

The NFL itself isn’t a joke but the coverage of the NFL is. Every week a different writer is ready to hop on someone elses dick. One week its Romo being a jackass the next week hes the most efficient Cowboy QB ever. One day the Jets are contenders, the next week the coach is a fat ass that should shut his mouth. The week after that Ryan can back up his talk and has this team headed to the Super Bowl. The following week the Jets are a train wreck, the worst team in the AFC and the biggest rabble rousers in the world. This preseason it was Eli being an idiot for saying he is on Bradys level. Two months later Eli is a beast that has Bradys number. NFL analysts are bipolar. I’m tired of their shit filtering into the internet. I come onto this site to avoid the consistent crap they feed us not read it. To those of you influenced by jackasses like Prisco or Cimini keep it off this site. I’d rather read real sound analysis than sensationalist bullshit about the demise of this team and some stupid locker room occurrence.

by Izzy76 on Nov 19, 2011 8:12 PM EST reply actions  

i see you met one of

our resident pessimists. great job by the way

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 19, 2011 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

The media doesnt so journalism anymore

Sensationalism is much easier for them. It’s not just the NFL either it’s also in the three other leagues as well. In the NHL it’s the constantly drooling over Crosby. The talking points in the NBA was 1. Is the Laker dynasty coming to end? 2. Boston is getting old 3. LeBron James is the next Jordan and 4. Are the Knicks real. With the MLB it was 1. Crowning the Red Sox world series champions 2. No one pointing out that Bud Selig is a hypocrite for getting rid of McCourt while doing nothing to Wilpon. 2a. Who the media hates more the Dodgers or the Mets 3. Philidouchia has a god like pitching staff

Oh and lets not forget idiots like Fatcessa who claims to have inside info but really is just a lying sack of shit

Mets, Jets, Devils, United Football League

by BlueChill on Nov 20, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

lets not bring up that jerks name

unless it is absoloutly neccesary .

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 20, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Sorry but I had to mention him

He’s just another idiot in the sports MSM who is apart of the sensationalism that is sports “journalism”

Mets, Jets, Devils, United Football League

by BlueChill on Nov 20, 2011 5:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks so much

Its so much easier to just point at the numbers than try to articulate what I am feeling at the moment. The bottom line is that there are many factors influencing Sanchez’s play other than Sanchez himself. I’m not saying we need to give him a pass as some people seem to suggest all Sanchez’s defenders do. He is certainly making boneheaded plays. But as you have pointed out, QB evaluation is often an inexact science when looking at individual years vs. the arc of a career. It’s also important to note that Sanchez doesn’t exist in a vacuum and his play is heavily influenced by everyone else on the field with him, on the sidelines, etc. FOr me at least, I can be annoyed with his poor play while still being willing to withhold judgment on his ultimate worth for at least a season without Schotty, if nothing else.

Also, I agree 100% with you comment on announcers. If those announcers Thursday night had been praising Tebow any higher his balls would have been on their chin. “There’s just something magical about him!!!” barf And don’t even get me started on ragging on the Jets for not using a timeout that they didn’t actually have…

"I reject your reality and substitute my own"
-Adam Savage

by blueandorange4life on Nov 19, 2011 8:41 PM EST reply actions  

I was going to do a post like this, as it clearly needed to be said that people are being as ridiculous as Giants fans who cry for Eli’s head every time their team starts losing. Mark’s career is just starting. He’s going through a tough time right now, but pretty much every qb does at one point or another. And it is fun to remember that people were essentially saying the same things about Brees then as they are about Sanchez now. They all just want to cry about his inability to manage a game without considering how terrible his coordinator is, and say that he has no signature wins despite the fact that he was the qb who led us past the Colts and the Patriots in last year’s playoffs.

Because seriously, last year was not so long ago that people should have forgotten this. I can’t even count the number of times I heard some variation of" if only the defense had gotten us the ball back for one last drive in the AFC championship, we would have driven the field and gone to the SB." And that’s coming from the same people who have completely lost faith in him because of what is essentially five to ten boneheaded plays while trying to run an offense from a coordinator who changes the ‘identity’ of the team more often than an old man changes his pants after burrito night.

At this point, the only players on the New York Jets who have CONCLUSIVELY proven that they are not capable of doing what they are paid to do are Eric Smith, Brian Schottenheimer and Calvin Pace. We KNOW that Schottenheimer sucks because he’s sucked with three different qbs. We KNOW that Eric Smith sucks because every team that has played us has targeted him with great success. And we KNOW that Pace is going to be a fine complementary rusher, but will not succeed without a dominant force rushing from the other side. From Mark, we’ve seen good, bad and ugly and there’s absolutely no definable trend at this point. He’s a typical young qb, and we are probably not going to know whether or not he’s the answer until the middle of next season.

by SioneBAAOOOHA on Nov 19, 2011 11:40 PM EST reply actions  

I personally love

Calvin Pace. Yea, he won’t get 15 sacks a year but hes good for 6-9 a year. The guy is a run stopper. If you look at OLBs that put up 15 sacks, you’ll only find Woodley and Ware. Woodley is not a good run stopper and Ware is a once in a decade talent. If you want to compare Pace to someone look at Lawrence Timmons. Guy can do everything pretty well. Pace does everything above average. Only players on this defense I would keep next year are Wilkerson, Revis, Cro, Wilson, Pace and Harris. Maybe Sione.

by Izzy76 on Nov 20, 2011 12:04 AM EST reply actions  

I am not anti-Sanchez

but some of these numbers are misleading. Why? Because many of those QBs had already had good to great years. Roethlesberger has a 98.1 and 98.6 QB rating BEFORE his bad 3rd year. Brees massive year was really his 3rd year (he had 1 start in 2001). As for Sanchez’ progress this year, it should be noted that Sanchez played last year in 4 horrible rain/wind starts and 3 snow starts. In the first 4 last year, all the QBs (Farve, Flacco, Rodgers, Henne) had horrible numbers too because the conditions were so bad. This year, a year where ALL passing numbers are way up, Sanchez has been blessed to play in perfect weather the entire season. I am not so sure how much improvement we have seen. It is true that we have had O-line problems, a revolving door at WR, a crap OC and running game problems all relative to previous years, but by and large Sanchez has not made big strides. It is not like Carr who got sacked 60 times a year behind the worst line in the league, so some of these excuses don’t ring so true. The best comparison if you want to be optimistic with Sanchez is Eli Manning, who had a similar team around him and still took a long time. But it is not like most good QBs took this long to develop…

by Buzzy on Nov 20, 2011 1:54 PM EST reply actions  

That’s a good point. Imagine Sanchez behind less than the all-pro line he enjoys in NY, and no run game, with an average defense. There’d be no AFCCG’s on his otherwise empty resume and he’d have been benched a long time ago.

by nationalist88 on Nov 22, 2011 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

and so would many successful QBs

you act like this isn’t a team sport when this is probably the BEST example of a team sport.

by PowerBar on Nov 23, 2011 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Not true at all. Look at the Colts when you take away Manning. Look at the 11-0 Packers whose defense ranks 30th in the league in yards against; that team is 90% Rodgers and 10% everybody else. Or how about the Patriots’ sorry defense? Doesn’t matter when you have Brady running the offense.

Nobody’s complaining about their lines, or defense, OC, or anything else because they have elite QB’s who can win games on their own. So why do we Jets fans keep making excuses for a scrub who still can’t perform with a great surrounding cast?

by nationalist88 on Nov 25, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

not true at all?

so football isn’t a team sport?

Nobody’s complaining about their lines, or defense, OC, or anything else because they have elite QB’s who can win games on their own.

                   
                 A) Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of our time. He is practically his own Offensive Coordinator.
                 B) Tom Brady is protected by one of the best offensive lines, he also has a head coach that is going to end up in the HoF and successfully gameplans around his players.
                 C) Aaron Rodgers is on mark for having a record breaking season and is supported by an excellent head coach and a GM that finds talent all over the place. He’s also had the luxury of learning from Brett Favre for 3 years. That team is full of playmakers. Jennings? Jermichael Finley? Nelson? Do you watch football?

And yes thanks for picking out the 3 most dominant QBs at the moment. That’s like saying everyone should be a genius, look at Einstein.

Why don’t you look at Alex Smith or Tim Tebow? There’s a reason their teams are winning. And don’t tell me those QBs aren’t more of a scrub then Sanchez.

by PowerBar on Nov 26, 2011 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone doesn’t need to be a genius. Just like every QB doesn’t need a 120 pt rating. But you need a standard of what’s acceptable. Why would you hire a retard to work for you if you could hire someone moderately intelligent? And why would you want a QB with a career 72 rating when there are plenty of them who can and do perform better?

You think Alex Smith is a scrub? Lol, well he’s also a guy who’s statistically better than Sanchez in career QB rating and completion percentage. More TD’s and total yardage as well, but he has played longer. And this is the first year he played on a decent team! And Tebow? Mark’s thrown as many picks the last 3 weeks as Tebow has in his career. Say what you want about the morbid mechanics of Tim’s throwing motion, the guy doesn’t make stupid decisions with the ball and lose his team games. Oh, and btw, higher career QB rating than Sanchez… Now, who’s the scrub?

by nationalist88 on Nov 28, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Everyone doesn’t need to be a genius. Just like every QB doesn’t need a 120 pt rating. But you need a standard of what’s acceptable.

Exactly, so don’t go to the extremes of pointing to the top 3 QBs when I tell you football is a prime example of a team sport.

You think Alex Smith is a scrub? Lol, well he’s also a guy who’s statistically better than Sanchez in career QB rating and completion percentage.

I like how you just cherry pick any statistic that supports your argument. Anyone can just randomly put up statistics to support their answer, but the truth in the statistics is in the analysis. How many years has Alex Smith played? How many has Sanchez played? Why don’t you actually track their progress after 3 years? Smith not only has a lower QB rating and completion percentage, but had actually regressed in his 3rd year.

And Tebow? Mark’s thrown as many picks the last 3 weeks as Tebow has in his career…Oh, and btw, higher career QB rating than Sanchez…

How many games has Tebow started? How many pass attempts does he have? Now how many pass attempts does Sanchez have? How many games have each of these players started? Why don’t you explain that to me? Because if all you can say is “oh but teh QB ratingz!” then you obviously don’t know what QB rating depends on nor how to use statistics.

by PowerBar on Nov 30, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

P.S. There's a reason nobody complains about their defense, OC, etc

it’s because they’re WINNING. Do you hear as many complaints about Schotty when we win? No it’s ‘eh he did an ok job but we got the win’. Do you think people would complain about Eric Smith if he didn’t miss that game-losing play? No, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t suck. Do people complain as much about how poor the Patriots have drafted the past 5 years? No, because winning ‘solves’ and hides a lot of deficiencies.

by PowerBar on Nov 26, 2011 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree 100% Just like we’re all gonna talk about Mark’s 4 TD’s now, and ignore the 2 picks that Buffalo DB’s got hit in the hands with and dropped. Or Plax and Keller making retarded catches to sustain scoring drives on badly thrown balls. Or the 48 completion pct.

by nationalist88 on Nov 28, 2011 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

you're right

because Sanchez isn’t the only QB that makes picks, and depends on WRs for their success. ie. Matt Moore and Brandon Marshall.

by PowerBar on Nov 30, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Its hardly misleading

Misleading was if I only listed QBs who had bad 3rd years. Doesn’t really matter if Brees spent one year on the bench. Rivers spent two full years on the bench before he became a starter. Your third season is your THIRD season no matter how you stack it. Under such an understanding this year would be Ryan Fitzpatrick’s 2nd season in the NFL despite playing for 7 years.

It is true Roethlisberger was efficient but he had a better team around him and a better coach. Most importantly, Roethlisberger in his first two seasons never had more than 17 TDs which is basically telling me that Cowher never put him in a position to fail. In his first 2 seasons, Roethlisberger was a game manager that was only asked to pass in safe situations. His 3rd year was the first time he was given responsibility and he led the league in INTs.

by Izzy76 on Nov 20, 2011 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

Nope.

your third year is not your third starting year-riding the pine may have some benefit, but it is not starting. Also-please don’t try to argue that Ben’s first 2 years were not massively better than what we have seen from Sanchez-if Sanchez ever reaches the level that Ben did in 2005 we should all be very very happy. You also leave out other good QBs in the league (Romo-4000+ yards, 97+QB rating, 36/19 in 3rd year, etc). The Fact is that the ranking of top QBs in the league goes something like Rodgers, Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, Roethlesberger, Romo, Schaub, Eli…). Of these, Schaub didnt even start till after his 3rd year, and Eli was a late bloomer, and that’s where the good comp ends. The other guys you compare him to (Palmer, McNabb, Cutler, etc) have had some decent years (McNabb especially) but are mostly nothing. You will find many more guys who bust or are average with Mark’s trajectory, and many more elite guys who showed it already. It does not mean it can’t happen, but I don’t think these comparisons make Sanchez look like he is on track for much.

by Buzzy on Nov 20, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

what a short term memory you have

McNabb has had many many good years in the league leading to several championship games and a superbowl appearance. Palmer and Cutler themselves are also very good QBs. To put them below Rothlesberger, Schaub and Eli is ridiculous.

Your argument about third years is even more ridiculous. These guys sitting on the pine like Rodgers clearly have a significant head start if you don’t count the years they were sitting on the pine learning the system. Sanchez had to learn on the fly from year one. So your argument is completely flawed. In fact, I’ve heard that Rodgers was completely raw and unprepared when in his rookie year and nothing like he is today.

Izzy has already mentioned that there are many other QBs great and not then don’t have good third years…so unless you have a statistical analysis to back up your claims like he does, I think your argument is more irrelevent.

by PowerBar on Nov 20, 2011 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Also notice...

The guy above stated that we would be happy if Sanchez put up Big Ben 2005 numbers with a 97 QB rating. I highly disagree. Putting up 17 TDs with a 97 rating is Pennington-esque. Jets fans were sick and tired of a QB who didn’t have the ability to control his offense.

I would seriously not take Sanchez being that QB over his whole career. I watched enough of Pennington to know that hes good enough to win but not good enough to take you deep in the playoffs. 17 TDs and 98 QB rating….no thank you. NFL is a passing league now. You’re gonna need to average more than a passing TD a game to win.

by Izzy76 on Nov 20, 2011 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

You guys (Powerbar and Izzy) are both being misleadingly selective

both with the facts and with what I said.
Powerbar: Cutler and Palmer are most certainly below Schaub, Eli and Roethlesberger by any stats you want to look at. Cutler is a middle of the road QB, and Palmer had a single excellent year. Schaub, Eli and Roethlesberger’s best years by QB rating, DVOA, DYAR, QBR, etc are statistically better in a clear way. I admitted that McNabb had several good years (hence the “especially McNabb”) but by DYAR he was not elite at the time. You might call him “fringe elite.” I would be very happy if Sanchez reached the peak of McNabb, so if that was not clear, I hope it is now.

As for Izzy, aside from leaving out guys like Romo that make your comparison, or choosing “3rd year” to make the single start Brees had as a rookie count as a year so as to push his breakout to his 4th year, you fail to note the irony of the fact that sanchez himself has largely been a game manager for his first 2 years and in the playoffs. He may have had more attempts (especially last year) but that is more a function of game situation (eg the 15-1 Steelers would run the ball when ahead, while the Jets last year had many cardiac games where they had to come from behind). Despite COLOR CODED arm bands, Sanchez the game manager couldn’t come close to the efficiency of Roethlesberger in those years. BTW-Pennington had much worse teams than Sanchez. A pre-injury Pennington was far ahead of Mark at this stage, weak arm or not.

When trying to gauge Sanchez’ progress you are failing to not several things:
a)Compared to the LEAGUE, Sanchez stats are not better this year than last; it is simply that all stats are up. By QB rating, DYAR, etc his RANK is the same (or worse).
b)He has dealt with picture perfect conditions, not the 2 games delayed by driving rain (Baltimore and Minnesota) or stormy (second Miami) or 30 mph winds (GB-where even Rodgers completed less than 50%), or snowy/muddy (second NE, Pitts, Chi) that he had to play through last year.

Indeed it is a passing league. That is why 8 out of the last 10 SB QB winners are Brady, Manning, Roethlesberger, Rodgers and Brees. Mark certaily seems more talented than what you would expect from a bust, but his reads are VERY slow, he is not accurate or particularly strong armed, etc. I do think he can reach the next level, but I think the odds are against it, and the comparisons you make suggest the same.

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I also forgot to mention

that by pass defense rank against-Sanchez has basically faced the worst passing Ds of any QB in the league this year-yet he still ranks below average in many QB stats.

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

but is this because of Sanchez?

or because of the coaching? You and every Sanchez detractor makes it sound like he’s the only one that’s struggling when in fact, the offensive line is struggling, the running game is struggling, receivers can’t get any separation.

This isn’t just about Sanchez. This is a failure on a bigger scale.

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

alot of times it is

“powerBar”.when in post game interviews You have a QB come out and say that the PICK-6 he threw was because HE saw his rec was well covered YET still threw it his way WHY?.that isnt the fault of any Coach BUT fault of a QB who I think tends to panic,who TRY;s being more than He really is!!!!

Beginning of the Season REX comes out and states he puts Sanchez in the Elite QB groupings..YET after the NE Game this Same Coach "throws His own QB under the bus! by saying when asked about when NE goes down field in under 90sec;s and scores..THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A ELITE QB is ON THE FIELD!!!.that right there was a KNOCK on HIS OWN QB!!!!

“IZZY”..reading ur comments about Denver game(yes we has 2 rb;s out) BUT with these players OUT means OTHERS must step forward,Like a Certain Captain!!! and he didnt!!!!..the only TD we got were because a OL had the smarts to fall on that fumble,other-wise the OF did nothing!!!!

where Sanchez needs to change is during post games interviews and SAY “WE” as a TEAM won or lost not to SAY it is because of HIM they lost!!!!

How can HE be at fault if the DEF plays poorly.How does his playing effect a Def teams performance…REX calls-controls ALl the DEF calls!!!..Def players have said that in BOTH games against NE they has the wrong people on the field!!!!.but Sanchez after a game STATES it was he who let the def down how???…what part of the game doesnt Sanchez understand?

His Pick-6’s are NOT the OC’s fault..when he calls out a “KILL-KILL” @ the line then that is HIS CALL and on how HE is READING coverages and LATELY HE has Failed big-time!!!!..after 3yrs u would think he could at least read coverages!!!! but He cant!!!!

ONE player doesnt win or lose a game..It is a TEAM..and when there is cracks in that Team u are seeing those results..when a OL allows 8 sacks in 2 games there is serious OL problems!!!!!…Sanchez is too blame for alot of those sacks because he HOLDS onto the ball too long!!!

and because he isnt a decent pocket-passer JETS hopes at running a no-huddle offense suffers…Right Now and I hate to say it is that HIS team-mate dont HOLD a 100% faith-trust in Him…DEF holds a team to 3 and out..In comes OF&Sanchez, and lately what are we seeing..#1 a sack..#2 a pick-6.so back on field comes DEF!!!..right there that tends to lose a DEF trust in there QB….how many times has Holmes “Called-out” Mark?…

whoever is working with mark on His mechanics has failed.what or better yet where is the ’other QB during that game..u never see him over talking with Mark after a pick-6, But u do see him sitting with other players laughing!!!!.Nor do u see the HEAD COACH talking with mark either!!!!!

by Jack2466 on Nov 21, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

It is about both.

And I am not a Sanchez detractor.

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

are we being misleadingly selective or are you?
Schaub, Eli and Roethlesberger’s best years by QB rating, DVOA, DYAR, QBR, etc are statistically better in a clear way.

BEST YEARS…why are we only looking at “best years”? By doing that, not only are you conveniently sidestepping the fact that almost all of these QBs started off on the bench (as opposed to Sanchez), but you are obviously ignoring an ENTIRE BODY of work.

Comparing Cutler and Palmer to Ben and Eli, both Cutler and Palmer have better completion %, Passer Rating and Y/A than Eli. The same can’t be said about Ben, however, Cutler and Palmer both have significantly far more attempts and yards than Roethlisberger, showing just how much the Steelers limit him and rely on their defense and running game compared to the other two.

The point is. You can’t just point out and compare players’ statistics in a vacuum. It is also apparent that you favor QBs that win a QB (Ben and Eli) over those who don’t.

The flaw in this thinking is the same as the flaw the Jets have right now. It’s not the QB that wins games, it’s the TEAM that wins games. And right now, the Jets have no O-Line, no running game, no good WR play, no good Safety play. And it shows. Plug in any two of those holes, and we’d be a top team again.

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Best years and overall.

Cutler and Palmer are clearly also inferior overall to Ben and Schaub as they are at peak (Schaub is a weird case since he was a backup for a long time). Best years only favors a guy like Palmer who was good for a very short while but bascally is average to slightly below average now. Cutler has never been good.

As for Eli-consider this-Eli over the last 3 years has been SIGNIFICANTLY better than either Cutler or Palmer by DYAR than for any slect 3 years of their careers. What that means is that Eli now (from 2008-2011) is clear better than those guys EVER have been.

As for the ‘team" winning games-Sanchez has a good team around him. The O-line has struggled relative to its own level of the previous two years, but only Hunter is below average on that line. Moore is good, Ferguson and Mangold are great, and Slauson is having a good year. Part of the sack problems are on Sanchez-he throws too early when he doesn’t have to and he holds the ball too long other times. Ask Peyton Manning, Tony Romo or ben Roethlesberger about bad offensive lines.

Where did I say that I favor SB-winning QBs? I was responding to the point made by Izzy that it is a passing league. My point was that that it shows in the teams with success. Only one time since 2000 did a team with a bad QB win the SB-and that team had a historically good defense. The Ravens of today have a similar problem to the Sanchez-led Jets up to now. The have good offensive weapons and a good D but an inconsistent QB. it makes it a lot harder to go all the way, because the easiest way to be consistent in today’s NFL is to have a good offense (defenses are far less consistent) and the best way to do that is through the QB.

Lastly, why do you think I am a Sanchez detractor? I really like Mark Sanchez and I think he has talent. However I think the odds that he reaches “elite” level are low, and the odds that he becomes significantly better than average are not overly high. Stop making excuses for him regarding the line, the receivers, the RBs, the OC. None of these are optimal, but in some cases the tools at his disposal are better than most have.

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

okay
It is true that we have had O-line problems, a revolving door at WR, a crap OC and running game problems all relative to previous years, but by and large Sanchez has not made big strides.

If you admit that many other aspects of the offense have all these problems, then how do you expect Sanchez to make big strides?

Cutler and Palmer are clearly also inferior overall to Ben and Schaub as they are at peak (Schaub is a weird case since he was a backup for a long time).

Why do you deny the fact that Schaub had the benefit of learning the game from the bench for 3 years?

As for Eli-consider this-Eli over the last 3 years has been SIGNIFICANTLY better than either Cutler or Palmer by DYAR than for any slect 3 years of their careers. What that means is that Eli now (from 2008-2011) is clear better than those guys EVER have been.

Since I was unfamiliar with DYAR and DVOA, I decided to go to Football Outsiders and familiarize myself with it. I was extremely skeptical when I saw that Sanchez had a better DYAR than Sam Bradford. In fact, last year, Matt Stafford AND Jay Cutler had a lower DYAR than Sanchez who had a lower DYAR of Chad Henne.

What I found was this:

DVOA is still far away from the point where we can use it to represent the value of a player separate from the performance of his ten teammates that are also involved in each play. That means that when we say, “Larry Johnson has a DVOA of 27.6%,” what we are really saying is “Larry Johnson, playing in the Kansas City offensive system with the Kansas City offensive line blocking for him and Matt Cassel selling the fake when necessary, has a DVOA of 27.6%.”

Which makes it even more difficult to extrapolate it to compare with OTHER QBs in their respective systems and teams. So again, I think it is your comparison that is misleadingly selective.

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Because:

A)Those problems are relative to our team in 2009 and 2010. Not the league. The Jets still have a better than average line and receiver corps. It is not like Sanchez is playing for a team like Peyton had to when he joined the Colts.
B)Regardless of things difficult to quantify like the importance of being an understudy, Cutler and Palmer are simply inferior to Schaub, Eli or Roethlesberger over a long enough stretch to proclaim them inferior by any aggregate statistic (QB rating, QBR, DYAR). For example, take Eli 2008-2011 and compare any of these to Cutler or Palmer over any 3 year stretch (or more importantly the last 3 years) and there is no arguing this-even though my original response was to a statement by you suggesting otherwise.
C)Regardless of the extreme honesty of Football Outsiders, DYAR is far better to look at than most other things for QBs-because all it is saying is on a per play basis weighted by context (eg 5 yard pass on 3rd and 4 worth more than a 15 year pass on 3rd and 25) how is better. The fact that a guy like Cutler is average at best on more than one team combined with his modes QB rating, etc should tell you all you need to know.

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

A) Where is the proof that they have a better than average offensive line and receiver corps?

B) So because things are ‘difficult to quantify’, you’re going to throw them out as if it doesn’t matter? Sounds lazy to me. Again you use a statistic that holds Sanchez as better than Stafford and Cutler last year.

C) Unfortunately, as FO points out, football is unlike baseball and basketball in that it is perhaps the most dependent on team play. Your reluctance to admit this fact and blindly point at statistics is again, lazy.Are you really going to blindly cite a statistic that says Alex Smith is better than Cam Newton and Jay Cutler?

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

also
As for the ‘team" winning games-Sanchez has a good team around him. The O-line has struggled relative to its own level of the previous two years, but only Hunter is below average on that line. Moore is good, Ferguson and Mangold are great, and Slauson is having a good year.

Slauson has been serviceable, Mangold was injured for several games, Brick has not been himself this year and Hunter and Ducasse have been subpar at best. But this is similar to our argument of Sanchez and the offense, one player can greatly impact the success of the entire line and it’s players. Right now it’s the poor play at RT. Several games ago, it was abysmal with the loss of Mangold on top of that. Are you going to point the finger at Sanchez for the poor play of his line and ignore how important line play is to the success of the team?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCa0eYB12Jo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zOFse_RzZI

Ask Peyton Manning, Tony Romo or ben Roethlesberger about bad offensive lines.

Peyton Manning is possibly the greatest QB of all time. Cowboys O-Line are better than you give it credit for. Big Ben has the unique size and physicality that is suited for a weak O-Line. Not to mention his success is still heavily dependent on the defense and Mendenhall, Bettis and Willie Parker. Peyton had Edgerrin James and Marvin Harrison. Romo constantly has playmakers around him. Who does Sanchez have?

Stop making excuses for him regarding the line, the receivers, the RBs, the OC. None of these are optimal, but in some cases the tools at his disposal are better than most have.

It’s called Root Cause Analysis. Instead of being lazy and scapegoating and pointing fingers at the first thing that pops up, you look at the underlying causes.

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not scapegoating

I am just not looking for any excuse I can like you are. I am a realist (not a Sanchez hater) and you are an unrealistic optimist. On the contrary, you are the one being lazy. I hope Sanchez becomes the best QB in the league, and I like the kid and think he will improve. But nothing about him suggests excellence in any of the 3 things a QB needs to be elite:reading/decision making, accuracy, arm strength/quickness of release. What in particular do you see that gives you such optimism? he reads slowly, largely makes bad decisions and telegraphs his passes, is not accurate, is not big, does not have a quick release or a very strong arm. What, in particular are you hanging your hopes on other than a biased view that some other QBs weren’t awesome after 3 years?

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 8:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I am just not looking for any excuse I can like you are.

Are you saying that a developing QB isn’t impacted by his offensive line? His OC? The offensive scheme that he works in?

you are an unrealistic optimist

I’ve said repeatedly on these boards that Sanchez isn’t as good as Peyton, Stafford or Bradford but he can still be much better than Alex Smith and Matt Ryan. I think that makes me more of a realist than an optimist. You on the other hand, seem to think that losing your Pro Bowl C, RT and having a moronic OC has no bearing on a QB’s success.

But nothing about him suggests excellence in any of the 3 things a QB needs to be elite:reading/decision making, accuracy, arm strength/quickness of release.

A) You need all 3 to be elite.
B) Reading/Decision Making is largely connected to coaching when you have a developing QB.
     Arm strength: Sanchez has adequate arm strength, it’s just not utilized.
     Accuracy: Yes Sanchez could use work on his accuracy (and can be worked on). That said, it’s hard to be accurate when your OLine is laying you on your back all the time to the point where you’re afraid to take a hit.

by PowerBar on Nov 22, 2011 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

What, in particular are you hanging your hopes on other than a biased view that some other QBs weren’t awesome after 3 years?

I was just rewatching the game and at one point, before Slauson scores the TD on the Powell fumble, Sanchez was 18 for 21. For someone that’s supposed to be horribly inaccurate, he was doing a good job. His incompletions were mostly on pressures/throwing it away.

by PowerBar on Nov 22, 2011 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

it is rather useless to argue with you because you repeatedly use the classic “bait-and-switch” technique. For example the argument above was based on if past history of recent QBs is a good or bad sign for Sanchez. You seemed to argue it is not a bad sign (and that was my main point-it IS a bad sign), but now you seed to switch it around to “who is to blame?” I don’t disagree that Sanchez is not blessed with the best offensive tools at his disposal. I do disagree that they are as bad as you imply (and indeed a lot of mark’s sack porblems are on him-he has a bad pocket feel and no useful internal clock), but that is beside the point-the point is these “tools” are not going to drastically change in the near future. One needs to look at progress or lack thereof in the context of the environment, and Sanchez, regardless of the causes, is not developing at a pace that makes one overly optimistic. Panic time? No, but optimism? No.

You do the same regarding statistical comparison. I said any composite statistic and then you repeatedly harp on DYAR. DYAR is just one number. Look at any aggregate number and tell me why Jay Cutler is a good QB.

So let’s just leave it at that-let’s just agree to disagree. I certainly hope Mark becomes a great QB and so do you, so that is something we can agree on.

by Buzzy on Nov 22, 2011 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

but now you seed to switch it around to "who is to blame?"

You decided to fall back on aggregate statistics that say that Alex Smith is better than Cam Newton and Jay Cutler. My point is you can’t just blindly point at statistics without asking how they’re derived and what effects them.

Look at any aggregate number and tell me why Jay Cutler is a good QB.

Using your aggregate statistics, Jay Cutler and Carson Palmer were top 10 QBs in 2007. In fact in 2008. Jay Cutler was the #5 QB in DYAR. Notice that there is a regression in these stats following that year. But oh wait? Doesn’t that correlate with his trade to CHI working under a different system and talent? That’s how you’re supposed to use statistics. Not ‘oh, he just sucked the following year, it’s all his fault.’

We can agree to disagree, but why don’t you answer my questions above about how you come to your conclusion that ‘it is a bad sign’ or of proof that the Jets O-Line hasn’t regressed significantly? Because statistics show that the Jets are near the bottom of the league in O-Line play this year.

by PowerBar on Nov 22, 2011 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Why argue with someone who can't read?

Where did I ever mention Alex Smith? When I said 3 straight years for aggregate statistics (and that guys like Cutler and Palmer have had basically a single good year) you choose to fall back on “in 2008…”. You are either dishonest or can’t read. And for a guy that talks about the collective nature of football as opposed to baseball, tell me what “statistic” show the Jets to be near the bottom in O-line play. Is it the sacks (which anyone knows are as much on the QB as the line) or the YPC (Shonn Greene’s YPC is identical to what it was last year after 10 games).

by Buzzy on Nov 22, 2011 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I see that I can't read (:-))

Because you don’t say I mentioned Smith, only a stat that rates Smith a certain way. My sense is that at this point we are not disagreeing. You seem to be saying that Sanchez’ development is being hindered by those around him. I am saying that Sanchez is not showing clear improvement regardless of the causes. That is not really a point of clearly defined argument…

by Buzzy on Nov 22, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

then perhaps we do agree then

I’m not a fan or detractor of Sanchez, I just can’t stand how a lot of people on this blog seem to overlook the fact that this is a complicated team game that involves various parts working properly in order to be successful.

It is difficult to tell how much blame should fall on Sanchez and how much potential Sanchez has lost. This is especially when there is almost (except for the Jets FO) universal agreement that their OC is a moron.

Here’s hoping they fire Schotty, hire someone competent, and give him the protection back along with a running game.

by PowerBar on Nov 23, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

P.S.

and you forget that Roethlisberger had the benefit of a ridiculously good coaching staff, defense and offensive stars. They had a team and created a system that was suitable to his strengths.

Pittsburgh works and practices on broken plays because they know Roethlisberger is so good at them. Meanwhile, the Jets FORCE Sanchez into a dink and dunk offense that requires accuracy…and oh yea…is mind bogglingly predictable!

by PowerBar on Nov 20, 2011 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree we need a change in O-coaching

but I am not so sure we can pin Mark’s developmental problems on coaching alone.

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

only because you say “developmental problems”. It’s one thing if Sanchez was like Ryan Leaf, Jamarcus Russell, or Matt Leinart. But he’s not. People have touted Sanchez for his work ethic. With someone like Sanchez that’s eager to do well, it’s up the coaches to work with him to get the most out of his potential.

If you want to just say ‘problems’ in general, then I agree. Because no QB is perfect. Eli has many flaws in his game, Big Ben has many flaws in his game, even Brady has flaws. But all of their teams work around their weakness and that’s what the Jets are currently not doing.

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

You keep bringing up Eli

but I already agreed-Eli was a late bloomer for sure. he has only been good since the age of 27 or 28. The point being that if you want to pin hopes of Sanchez on some other case, it is Eli. however for every Eli there are 4 others who had that profile and busted…

by Buzzy on Nov 21, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

except you again neglect that

most of these successful quarterbacks had the benefit of starting their careers in an understudy type of role. Look at Schaub and Rodgers.

by PowerBar on Nov 21, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Sanchez absolutely has a great work ethic, and it’s a quality that elite QB’s have. The problem is, elite QB’s are also accurate and make good decisions. Every one of them. That’s why they’re elite. You can’t coach that ability and instinct, and that’s why I don’t believe a change of OC will make Sanchez the QB we thought he was when we drafted him.

by nationalist88 on Nov 22, 2011 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

you can't coach accuracy and good decisions?

so you’re saying that all pitchers knew how to throw in a 3×2×2 box since they picked up a baseball? Or that all world leaders made sound intelligent decisions since birth?

Some have it more natural than others. But don’t think that Peyton Manning didn’t work his ass off everyday to keep his accuracy and football acumen.

by PowerBar on Nov 22, 2011 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

No, you can’t coach accuracy. You can improve on it through coaching the same way a good coach can improve your high jump, but the individual potential is limited to genetics and God-given ability.

You cannot take a Jeff George and turn him into a Dan Marino, not with the best coach in the world, and Jeff working his ass off to get there. The infinite number of factors needed to create that level of talent is just not existent in that player.

by nationalist88 on Nov 25, 2011 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

have you ever played ball?
No, you can’t coach accuracy. You can improve on it through coaching the same way a good coach can improve your high jump,

Thanks for contradicting yourself and proving my point.

by PowerBar on Nov 26, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Um, yes I have played football. And no, I am not contradicting myself, and you know it. Because that would mean the only reason YOU don’t throw a football as well as Dan Fouts is because you didn’t have proper coaching.

Which we both know is ridiculous.

by nationalist88 on Nov 28, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

again you're grasping at straws

obviously, the average person with no formal football training and pedigree cannot be compared with a NFL player. That’s comparing apples and oranges.

However, comparing two NFL caliber players such as Sanchez, Roethlisberger, and Brady is fair. According to you, they’re either Brady, Manning or Rodgers or they suck. There are plenty of good QBs out there with systems that support them that you’re neglecting just to prove your own point. I guess there are only 3 good QBs in this league and the rest are scrubs right?

Btw, last time I checked, Brad Johnson, Big Ben and Eli are all QBs known for their innaccuracy that won SBs.

by PowerBar on Nov 30, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice Post...

…I feel Sanchez will be fine and should grow by leaps and bounds if “The Team” can manage to correct a few major/obvious flaws. First and foremost the o-line needs to be upgraded. When MS has time in the pocket he looks great, the loss of Mangold showed the lack of depth as well. I always say “good teams start by building then o-line” ; in the case of “Gang Green” it is not MS who has regressed . The regression is the o-line (lost Woody) and did nothing to replace him. I blame this one on the GM. It is not only affecting MS but the RB core as well due to the lack of running lanes being opened up. This problem has caused an inept offense (run/pass) as well as adversely affecting the defensive unit as well by keeping them on the field too long(most games), too many 3 and outs, as well as being unable to score on opening drives(for the most part). MS has taken a beating this season and I am grateful he is healthy let alone his overall stats have improved.

The other problem is lack of pass rush on defense. This years squad is paying for the “Instant success” R.R. brought to the team by making it to the championship game in his first two years. This handcuffed the team during FA in back to back years due to final four rules as well as drafting behind teams that finished the season with better records in consecutive seasons. I would like to see this team make the playoffs and go on a run as it has the pas two years except that is coming from my heart and not my head. The team is good enough to make the playoffs and the schedule may allow it(from here on in), it has been tough to this point in my opinion i.e. last Thursday night the cross country game to “mile high” after a rivalry game with the Pat’s(I could go on). My head tells me this team needs a few more players to win a super bowl so this is a good time to watch which players are playing and improving so we can upgrade the few weak spots this team has. The coaching staff should be being evaluated as well. I have had enough “Shotty” @ OC and I feel the replacement is coaching our o-line. Callahan has proven he can do the job and he knows the team/talent. His replacement in my opinion would be T. Sporano as the writing is on the wall in Miami. He knows the division very well and in my estimation would be an excellent fit for “Gang Greens” future.

by BachsOfRain on Nov 20, 2011 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

I am withholding judgement on Sanchez

Until I see how he plays with a different offensive coordinator. Hopefully that will occur next year.

"I just build our guys up. If it's trash talking that I believe in our football team, then, yes, I agree with that statement. I'm the biggest trash talker there is." Rex Ryan

by OldJetsFanatic on Nov 20, 2011 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

I agree.

First of all, good post.

I’ve been pretty tough on the whole team, and Sanchez does get me a bit tight. But I’ll be reserved on his progress until we get a new OC. They haven’t developed him at all and it goes to show in his volatility.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
I put God first! Anything else comes a distant second, next to a cross-country third.
Being that I'm Nigerian, being a Jets' Fan only comes natural... it's all about that old Green and White.
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference. If you don't understand this, then you're losing big time.

by King A! on Nov 21, 2011 9:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree But also diagree

“king A!”..everyone keeps putting blame on the OC. why?..the Game plan each week comes from the HEAD-COACH, also during the game REX makes changes YET when play doesnt work it is the OC’s fault!!!!.and dont tell me REX doesnt make the calls..In Both NE games the DEF has said that THEY HAD THE WRONG PLAYERS on the FIELD!! that DEF is REX;s baby He makes ALl there calls and put’s the players on the field!!!!

now say we bring in a New OC and Sanchez still the same then what will you say? well he is new he isnt use to the sys.give him time to work with Mark BS!!!!…

Face it and i have to admit it myself in that Sanchez wasnt such a great QB @ USC!!!!..sure he was thrown into position BUT after 3 yrs U would think He would have by NOW learned to read coverages!!!.when he calls out His favorite 2-words(kill-kill) @ the line then that plays failures rest squarely upon His shoulders NOT the OC;s!!!!

when u have a QB after every lost say in POST game interviews HE Lost the game..NOT 1 person wins or lose;s it is a TEAM effort…Mark failure too me is He thinks JETS win because of HIM and lose because of HIM and it doesnt work that way!!!..Ya they won 4 play-off games, But dodnt u play a game too win?..BUt the TEAM won those games NOT 1 MAN!! as Mark thinks!!!!..he needs to lose this ME-ME crap!!!!!

look around the league when other teams win or lose they(TEAM) all saying it was a TEAM Effort.wasnt because of 1 player..BUT Mark seems to think the JETS revolve around HIM, well they DONT and as soon as he can see and understand that MAYBE the TEAm will respect him Better…8 sacks in 2 games is a reflection HIS own OL has lost His trust!!!!…and I feel His DEF;s as well…I mean why work to hold a team to 3 and out only too see Your QB come back on field and throw a pick-6 and after game admit that He saw REC was well covered yet still threw the ball? thats play of a pure knucklehead!! not a 3yr Pro!!!!

by Jack2466 on Nov 21, 2011 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Solid analysis. Great Job.

I think if we can retain plax and maybe try and bring back Braylon that would be a plus for Sanchez. I like sanchez alot and even though he does deserve some critcism, it’s not all his fault. On paper he has alot to work with and should be succeeding, but he’s a young QB. we are still a good football team, and with alot of wildcard hopefuls losing yesterday things can really heat up for us.

by jets4life24 on Nov 21, 2011 4:42 PM EST reply actions  

Great Post

I don’t know if Sanchez will ever be a HoF QB. But here is what I do know. Sanchez is good enough to win a Super Bowl if the rest of the team is up to snuff.

Right now, when you remove Sanchez from the equation, the Jets are not a Super Bowl championship team. Sure, maybe a Tom Brady or a healthy Payton Manning could put the team on their backs and carry it to glory. But those guys are not available. So let’s deal with reality.

Reality is that it will be much easier to hire a new OC and plug the other personnel holes than it will be to find a QB who will be better than Sanchez will be next year.

by square1 on Nov 23, 2011 3:07 PM EST reply actions  

maybe fire the coach as well

the full Jets problems begin and end with REX!!!…Now he has Brunell run a few plays in practise and Sanchez has a hissy-fit..thats too me is a spoiled player!!!..The Team is HIS .Team belongs to Coach!!! once Sanchez learns what a TEAM concept is Maybe he will gain His OL respect! and His defense Respect….he has to get rid of this “I” won the game or “I” lost the game…when it is the TEAM!!!!!…

by Jack2466 on Nov 24, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope...

Rex didn’t initially bring Schotty on board…Schotty was there before Rex. You call it a “hissy-fit” with Sanchez…it seems to be some strange type of gamesmanship on Rex’s part…we just have to wait and see if it has the same affect as last time. Also, if it works again Kellen Clemens wouldn’t show that fire to be upset about losing snaps had we kept him and started him. I don’t see Sanchez doing an Albert Haynsworth and sitting on the sideline pouting when things don’t go his way. Firing Rex at this point would be absolutely the dumbest move possible…he did amazing things with this defense and he is not a offensive minded coach, he needs help on that side of the ball. I just think it would be idiotic to fire Rex after 2 AFC championship runs in his first 2 years…you don’t fire a coach with that record because a .500 record at 10 games in…you give him the time to fix the problems that arose from personnel moves/injuries/etc. If they fired Rex right now then the Jets organization would deserve 10-20 years of bad luck because of poor decision…so with that said Rex/Tanny need to replace Schotty!

by Mac N Cheese on Nov 25, 2011 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Hard to replace Sanchez? The Miami Dolphins found a QB who’s playing better than Mark Sanchez and he was sitting on their bench. Behind Chad Henne. Let’s tell the truth. How about Andy Dalton? Colt McCoy from pathetic Cleveland? Look at the numbers and compare them.

And if you don’t know whether Mark will ever be a HOF QB, lol, let me help you out – he won’t. #1 running game in football, top 5 defense, and a top 5 O-line got us to the Championship games twice. Take away Greene, and you get 30-17 Colts. And Sanchez shoulda been Pittsburgh’s MVP when we lost the next one, after tossing them 7 points and being typically incapable of producing any points of his own is the first half.

by nationalist88 on Nov 25, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Try this one...

None of them are dealing with the playcalling of Schotty! We can say all day that Sanchez is replaceable but we don’t know what he “really” is. I dare say the only QBs that can be successful with Schotty calling plays are future HOF QBs or truly elite QBs. Sanchez might be good at best for all we know but he can’t even be that with this O Coordinator.

by Mac N Cheese on Nov 25, 2011 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

You know, I would give him a year under a new OC. That’s fair. To show something, ANYTHING, to suggest that he can make plays and consistently move the chains. Roll him out, let him run like he wants to, whatever. All I know is what he’s doing now is not working…

Unlike most fans, I don’t assume that potential is there because you don’t see it. And the only thing that ever made Sanchez look competent IMO was Braylon Edwards, and he’s gone. And that had to be the OC’s decision too.

by nationalist88 on Nov 26, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

actually in the last game

he rolled off 10 straight completion mostly on short routes, and we know that’s not his game. Sanchez has always done well on the roll out, and play action mid field strikes and we haven’t seen any of that. Partially because he has no protection this year, and partially because the OC sucks.

Also, Shonne Greene is not a #1 running game. He’s proven to be average at best, especially since the O-Line exposed him. He’s no Adrian Peterson.

People have short memories and forget about last year when Sanchez took over games in the 4th quarter…probably because they let the leash off of him. How many comebacks has he led since last year? Look it up because it’s alot.

by PowerBar on Nov 26, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Greene is a good back. But he is not very durable. He needs someone to share the workload. And Sanchez doesn’t “take games over”, he has had success running the 2 minute against prevent defenses. He’s credited with 8 game winning drives incl postseason I believe… Curiously, he also has the worst 4th quarter completion pct in the entire league among starters.

by nationalist88 on Nov 28, 2011 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Greene is a very average back

he’s not exceptionally agile, he can’t make big cuts, he’s not exceptionally fast. He is a RB that relies on a good O-line. And even when he breaks tackles, he is as you said, not very durable.

You said we had the #1 running game ( you must be referring to last year)…do you think that’s because of Greene or because it was the play of our O-Line?

And Sanchez doesn’t "take games over", he has had success running the 2 minute against prevent defenses. He’s credited with 8 game winning drives incl postseason I believe

Sounds like you contradicted yourself again. 8 game winning drives, but you say he hasn’t shown the ability ‘to take games over’. Sounds more like to me that when they let the leash off, he’s more apt to ‘take games over’.

by PowerBar on Nov 30, 2011 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

dammit national

you know the d lost us that colt game. you know that. also moore did this 2 years ago, by the way. the panthers were like 2-7, and he took them to 7-9. he was named the starter the next year, and he threw 4 picks. if sanchez threw 3 picks you would go crazy. and the steelers game, do i have to remind you again that we couldn’t stop mendenhall, and that our oc was terrible that game? you are just grasping at straws now. you are making up reasons now.

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 25, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe if we could control the ball better and get a few more first downs, the D would not have given up 30 to Peyton. He had too many opportunities esp. when our run game disappeared. But you can’t deny that 17 points against the Colts defense is unacceptable. Because they aren’t that good #1, and #2 what are the chances of holding Manning to 14 pts?

by nationalist88 on Nov 26, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

the point of this post is clear

you realy can’t tell by the 3rd year how the qb is going to be. you have come up with 10 different arguments here and all of them have been proven wrong by many people. you will probably have a couple more bad reasons when you reply.

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 25, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Proven wrong? What did I miss? Lol because all I hear about is the playoff games he didn’t lose and give him time he’s developing. Meanwhile there are QB’s who can actually diagnose a defense out there performing better on MUCH less talented offenses. Do me a favor. Look up Matt Moore’s stats this year and tell me how I’m wrong saying he’s better than our #5 overall draft pick. And I guarantee you, the next time we play Miami, Moore will actually LEARN from his mistakes and will stay the hell away from Revis this time around.

Ok then how many years does a player have to do the same thing over and over again before you can reasonably conclude he’s going to keep doing the same thing over and over again?

by nationalist88 on Nov 26, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

oh yea Matt Moore

He of the 5 TD , 9 INT , 53% completion rate and 57.5 QB rating last year. Oh yea he’s awesome.

And this year? Oh yea he has Brandon Marshall, but I guess that only makes Moore “look competent” (in your own words) and should take that out of the equation because you took Braylon Edwards out of the equation also right? In fact, Steve Smith is having an awesome year this year and that didn’t seem to help him last year.

Get real.

by PowerBar on Nov 26, 2011 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

moore, and you continue not to get the point of this post

is in his 5th year. he did the same thing he did now in 09, when his team was 2-7. and then he sucked when he became the full time starter. in moore’s 4th year, he had a 55 qb rating. sanchez has a 80 qb rating at this point with no running attack, a leaky o-line and a idiot o cordinator. despite all that he is having his best year so far. if he had a top 5 d, a top 5 o-line and a top 5 rushing attack last year, which he has none of now, and he is still getting better. this is a qb that started 1 year in college, moore started 2. so moore has 3 more years of experiance. he has a amazing wr, a decent rushing attack, and a oc who shouldn’t be fired. yet his qb rating is 8 points better then sanchez. you are complaining about a 80 qb rating. imagine if he did a matt moore and had a 55 qb rating next year. plus, you are predicting miami will beat us. you are just a pessimist.

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 26, 2011 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Remind me where I said we’d lose to Miami? Oh yeah, I didn’t. I’m saying their QB is playing better. Because he is.

Are you intoxicated? Or do you not realize you’re comparing Moore’s worst season (in Carolina no less) to Sanchez’s best season? I’m not cherry picking stats like your friend above there, I’m talking CAREER. Both of you, read this very carefully:

Matt Moore’s numbers are better than Sanchez’s this year.

Matt Moore’s career numbers are better than Sanchez’s.

Numbers aren’t “pessimistic”. They’re factual. And they trump all three of our opinions put together.

by nationalist88 on Nov 28, 2011 1:14 AM EST up reply actions  

well
And I guarantee you, the next time we play Miami, Moore will actually LEARN from his mistakes and will stay the hell away from Revis this time around.

do you think we will beat miami? answer me. and i can take sanchez’s worst season, and it was better then moore’s worst year. not to mention that sanchez was a rookie, getting better. moore regressed. he is like tyler thigpen. he does well when his team has no chance to get anywhere. he did this 2 years ago. the one time he was a full time starter, he was terrible. also, moore has played better so far. he has played less games then sanchez. if moore has a bad game, he will be close to sanchez. they are 7 qb points away from each other. sanchez has played 4 more games. you take away the terrible ravens game, the game sanchez couldn’t get off a pass without getting hit, and moore is a couple of points better. lets wait to the end of the year.. you have to have patience, as i’ve said. moore is in his 5th year, with a career qb rating of 78. sanchez in his 3rd year is qb rating carrierwise is 73.5. sanchez will get better, and his qb rating will get up. and unlike moore, sanchez has won meanigfull games. if sanchez has a 81 rating now in his 3rd year, he is on pace to be well over that number in 2 years. he has went from 63 to 75 to 81 for now. moore has went up and down. the facts are how you look at them. you see what you want to see, the facts you posted abve are true, but they are far from telling the whole story. jeff george’s carrer qb rating is better then john elway’s. do you know who jeff george is? the difference is that george nver won anything. elway did. would i take george over elway? definetly not.

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 28, 2011 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

This is my point to Sanchez loyalists: how much patience do we have to have? How long do we have to wait? Because in 3 seasons all we’ve seen is a guy who “manages” an extremely talented football team. Kind of.. We’re not gonna be good forever. Mangold, Harris, Revis, Scott, Brick, even role players who contribute that are in their prime, aren’t gonne be around forever. There’s a fine line between win now and rebuliding. And I am sick to death of rebuilding. If you can instantly upgrade by switching out one component, I think you have to do it.

I see what you’re saying about George’s career rating vs. Elway’s. Though I was shocked at just how good Jeff’s numbers were; over 12 seasons he only had 4 where his INT’s outnumbered his TD’s. Pretty surprising for a guy known for throwing backbreaking INT’s. Still RTJ, pass rating is the only stat George is even close to Elway, and that is by a mere 5 tenths of a percentage point. In yardage, completions, and TD passes the captain of The Drive doubles George’s numbers.

To answer your question, the way both teams are playing right now? Especially defensively and at the QB position? If I had to call it straight up I would bet Miami. Wouldn’t you? They’re playing better and they’re at home. And how does our QB tend to fare against good defenses?

by nationalist88 on Nov 29, 2011 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

well

he had a 96 qb rating the last time he played mia this year, so i wouldn’t worry. mia little ride ended in last weeks loss to dallas. and to answer this

This is my point to Sanchez loyalists: how much patience do we have to have? How long do we have to wait? Because in 3 seasons all we’ve seen is a guy who "manages" an extremely talented football team. Kind of

brees, eli and big ben all had worse seasons then sanchez in their 3rd year. you’d like to have these guys, right? all of these guys had more talent on their team then sanchez has now. the steelers won the sb the previous year, and big ben played terrible in that game. brees had lt in the backfield, a young lt. eli had tiki and a young plax. the giants and steelers d was better then the jets d this year. yet their seasons were worse then sanchez’s. the point of this post is that sanchez can become like them. you just have to wait past this year. eli didn’t have a great 4th year either. brees had a great year. we don’t know what is going to happen, but you can’t give up now. like peter king said in an article, we can judge draft picks 5 years later. after 5 years, all these guys had a good season. you got to remember that. to answer your next statement

We’re not gonna be good forever. Mangold, Harris, Revis, Scott, Brick, even role players who contribute that are in their prime, aren’t gonne be around forever. There’s a fine line between win now and rebuliding. And I am sick to death of rebuilding. If you can instantly upgrade by switching out one component, I think you have to do it.

of course they are not going to be good forever. everyone but scott should still be producing for at least 5 more years. brick and mangold even more. we are not rebuiding. we need to add a few pieces that will make this team elite. if we can get to the afcc with gaping holes, you could imagine where we will get when they are filled. our d-line is young. greene and mckinght are young. the guys you mentioned above are going into their primes. this is a team that will be much better as soon as sanchez hits the next level, and our young players emerge and our rookies and fa’s fill the gaps. have faith. it’s tough to be a jet fan, but to be happy you have to stay optimistic.

"it's not easy being green"-kermit the frog
"we the mets are an improved ball club, now we lose in extra innings"-casy stengel
i cant spell a nosebleed
The Official Seinfeld Gif-Man of GGN!!!!!!!!
i'm a moderator for GGN. I will accept tribute.

by rexthejet on Nov 29, 2011 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

So you are saying that Moore, Dalton, and McCoy are HoF QBs? Please.

I’m not saying that Sanchez is above criticism. I’m not saying that he is irreplaceable. And I’m not saying that the Jets’ couldn’t catch lightning in a bottle and find a cheap QB who morphs into a Super Bowl MVP. Who knows, maybe Moore will be the next Kurt Warner.

But you have to play the odds. And the odds say that it is unlikely that in the next couple of years the Jets can get a QB who is proven to be better than Sanchez without dismanting the rest of the team. So instead of hitting the panic button, it makes more sense to fix the supporting cast: the play-caller, the OL, and the receivers and then figure out what you have.

And, no, it doesn’t makes sense to assume that Sanchez will never improve and that if he couldn’t get past the AFC title game in the past then he never will.

by square1 on Nov 25, 2011 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

After further...

…review. I feel two things. First we need to find another “Play making TE; who can block as well as receive”. Give us a TE similar to what Brady has in N.E. and on OC who knows how to use him(otherwise the first part will not matter). The second thing is it sounds as if M.Sanchez is a year ahead of P.Manning in his development(again we can thank our present OC/QB coaches for the failure to do their respective jobs)as I am seeing M. Sanches throw for almost as many “Pick 6’s” as T.D.‘s. The past two games he has thrown 3 T.D’s and 2 Pick 6’s for a net result of +7 points(These were very big games mind you). The AFC East has now all but been decided, The 2 losses in 4 days has the team in a tailspin and fighting for it’s life to make another Wild Card entry into the playoffs.

by BachsOfRain on Nov 26, 2011 3:26 PM EST reply actions  

Do not...

…mistakenly think we should draft a TE in the first round. There are plenty of holes to fill where the best player available, or trading up/down is probably in the best interest overall. With a full set of draft picks and no FA restrictions this team should be able to fill all the glaring holes and add depth as well. I see next year as the year this team continues it’s flight pattern to SB champions. We need to get over the growing pains to get stronger (IMO) unfortunately.

by BachsOfRain on Nov 26, 2011 3:32 PM EST reply actions  

Judging QB

Depends on his/team expectations. Was he drafted #1 or #88 overall? If your questioning his abilities there’s probably a problem. Elite QB’s win regardless of defiencies around them; rather they elevate everyone else’s play. Buffalo was remiss in not getting QB at #3 overall last yr , still pissed. I wouldn’t trade for Sanchez, he’s not what I consider elite to date.

Home Of The Neverending Rebuild. Question Authority!

by buffalobacker on Nov 26, 2011 10:19 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New York Jets.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rackmultipart
GGN Thread About Nothing #18 Enter Sandman
545595_428600250485671_100000070982458_1739202_129649609_n_1_small
5 players that i expect to see improvement from this year
P3733056reg_small
Why will Aaron Maybin get 10-20 sacks this season.
Small
Do You Trust The Jets' Front Office?
Small
Diggin Dunbar Diggin the 46

Recent FanPosts

Small
Will G&P Be Back in 2012?
P3733056reg_small
My Life as a New York Jets Fan.
Small
Conner can run
Small
Thoughts on the upcoming season part 1: What to watch for
Small
Thoughts On the Upcoming Season Part 2: The season
Small
Thoughts On the Upcoming Season Part 3: Cleaning House
Small
The Peyton-Goes-Down Debacle Prequel, and the Best QB Some of You Never Heard Of.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Gangreen-large_small John B

Great-british-events-flag_small David_Wyatt

Staff Writers

Revis_island_small Bro Namath

943_small dvdvil

Wayne_chrebet1_small GangGreenMag

Haters_small bobdolethesnapplelady

Santana_moss_small Jeff W.

Moderators

Revis_christ_small Judgegavel

Return_of_the_jet-i_small MachlinT

Jimmy2_small Tamarack

Rackmultipart rexthejet