Fanhouse's David Whitley Crosses the Line, Compares Edwards' Benching to Casey Johnson Situation

I did not even realize there was a second quote. I am so mad I am almost shaking.

Said he was:
A) Unlucky, and did something most people have done.
B) Shouldn’t be banned by the NFL because spending 24 days in jail was punishment enough.

Hypocracy Here

It is there for no other reason besides trying to be hurtful, it adds nothing to the story (if you could even call it a story)
.
How do I find out who the editor is, or do they function like a newspaper? Not sure if they can just post stuff randomly with out having someone okay what was written?

Acting like a complete idiot and dirt bag should have consequences too!

It can, and often does, lead to feelings of isolation, rage, and fear. Those who don’t live with it could never understand how difficult it can be to cope. It influences every decision you make and, when dealing with the emotional burden of a chronic illness, your judgments and motives are often clouded and lead you to make wrong decisions that are the result of those very emotions— isolation, fear, and rage.

This poor girl suffered her whole life. Continuing to rag on her after her death is about as low as it gets. He might not understand, be he should be ashamed.

Calling David Whitley a journalist is like calling the fry cook down at Micky D’s a chef. Actually that’s probably unfair to the kid at McDonald’s who puts more thought and effort into his product. The real problem is the credibility, or lack thereof. of a site like Fanhouse. Treating this site, those like it and the people like Whitley who write for it as legitimate sources for news and opinion is the real issue. There are a lot of great things about the internet as an information resource, but it is also like a giant wall for graffiti. Just scroll through the “comments” section after any news article regarding anything that is the least bit controversial and look at the miscreants that post, apparently from their mother’s basements. Just because its on the internet doesn’t make it legitimate. While we need to be smart enough on our own to separate the wheat from the chaff in terms of what we read, the real outrage should be directed at Fanhouse for disseminating swill like this under the guise of journalism. This is just another example of what is symptomatic of a much larger problem with news and journalism in the internet age. The credibility of Fanhouse is suspect at best, more likely non-existent. Unless you have excessive time on your hands, it is a site best avoided.

to respond?

No responsible parent would write an article so hurtful about someones deceased child. You never ever talk about someones child dying. Mr. Johnson, I am sure thinks of his child each and every day. But I am sure he does not related the dwi of one his players to his child death. No class, and needs a kick in the ass.

In so many ways.