Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White: Carlos Condit Accepts Rematch With Nick Diaz

Where Can the New York Jets Least Afford an Injury?

No injury is ever a good thing, but depending on the composition of the roster, teams are better equipped to handle injuries in certain spots than others. The Jets have a lot of talent on their roster. I am not sure there is a single player whose absence could torpedo the season if coaching strategy changes, and other players step up. Life is a lot easier with the starters in there, though. They are starters for a reason. They are the best players. Here is where I think the team would see a significant downgrade with backups.

Quarterback: Mark Sanchez had a coming out party of sorts in the Playoffs with 4 touchdowns, 2 interceptions, and a 92.7 quarterback rating. He was no Joe Flacco, getting carried by a defense. He earned his keep in January. Even more, he showed great recognition on the field. I think back to the 80 yard bomb in the AFC Championship Game where he pump faked to buy himself extra time with Dwight Freeney bearing down on him and to freeze the safety deep. The Jets are going to rely much more heavily on the passing game this year. Sanchez has the potential to join the upper tier of quarterbacks in the league. The passing game probably will not grow with any other quarterback on the roster. Mark Brunell brings some value as a veteran mentor, but it has been about a decade since he played his best football. Kellen Clemens is by all accounts one of the best people in the league, but his on field play has not been very good in his four years. Erik Ainge and Kevin O'Connell are untested. Under any of the four men behind him on the depth chart, the offense will likely have to revert back to purely ground and pound to keep the team in the game.

Tight End: The Jets do not have a pass catching tight end like Dustin Keller on the roster. He adds an extra dimension to the offense as a matchup problem for linebackers and safeties. Ben Hartsock is an excellent blocker, but that is all. He is a third tackle type of tight end. He has 28 catches and 1 touchdown in a career that started in 2004. Matthew Mulligan also looks like a big blocker. Jeff Cumberland has potential to become a player one day but is very raw. My guess is he ends up on the practice squad as a developmental player.

Safety: I like the guys the Jets have as backup safeties, Eric Smith and James Ihedigbo. I think they both have played well in subpackages given specialized roles tailored to their talents. I'm not sure how comfortable I would be with either starting. Smith is a former starter, and his warts tend to show in an expanded role. He's not very fast or athletic by NFL standards. Ihedigbo impressed me as a blitzer, but we haven't seen a lot of him in coverage. I would be a little concerned if something happened to Jim Leonhard or Brodney Pool.

Are there any positions you are concerned about a lack of depth?

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Gang Green Nation

Lunchtime Cup of Bro

Feb 2012 by Bro Namath - 49 comments

Wayne Hunter: Stay or Go?

Feb 2012 by John B - 20 comments

Flight Connections 02-06-12

Feb 2012 by dvdvil - 25 comments

Giants Win Super Bowl XLVI

Feb 2012 by John B - 163 comments

Potential Jets: Shaun Hill

Feb 2012 by John B - 28 comments

Comments

Display:

Positions I'm concerned about lack of depth

QB
Running back to can run between the tackles
slot receiver.
receiving tight end
run blocking tight end
LT, C
LE, RE
ILB
nickel corner
free safety
kicker
punter

by jets47 on Aug 7, 2010 3:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Nickel corner, and slot receiver?

those are probably two of the strongest positions on the team (well corner is dependent on Revis being here of course).

Lowery is a very decent nickel in most situations, and Wilson is arguably the best corner in the draft, and will probably be the best nickel back in the league this year.

Cotch would be a great number 2 on almost any team and fits perfect as a slot, Coles is still very capable as a third option, and even Clowney, Smith, and Allison have great potential.

Agree with the rest pretty much though.

by Judgegavel on Aug 7, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess Coles would be good for depth. I forget about him signing. Outside of him we have the big 3, and little after that.

Lowery is actually better on the outside than in the slot. I dont like him as a nickel. He can’t cover a lot of shifty slot receivers.

by jets47 on Aug 7, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Most teams don't even have a "big 3" at WR

We’re pretty much set there.

If either Revis or Cro goes down I’d expect to see Lowery on the outside rather than Wilson, so I don’t think that’ll be too much of an issue. My problem is when the Pats go 5-wide and we have to see… Drew !@#$ing Coleman auuuughhh

by Exystence on Aug 7, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we are going to wind up seeing Warren or even Brian Jackson in that spot this year.

by Judgegavel on Aug 7, 2010 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes Lowery's better on the outside...

and he certainly not perfect see Indy game last year, but he’s still above average for a #3 CB and he’s actually the #4 so I think its a pretty strong position from a depth perspective.

by Judgegavel on Aug 7, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Running Back

If Greene goes down for a long stretch, I don’t trust LD to be able to handle the grind over the long haul.

by Crackback on Aug 7, 2010 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I think he certainly has to be used differently than Greene...

but I still think he has enough left to be the feature back if Greene goes down, I just think you would see Conner get the ball in short yardage situations. Good chance they would still have CWash on the practice squad to activate as well.

by Judgegavel on Aug 7, 2010 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, LD is a situational player and no longer a workhorse back. Also would include LT and C as positions where we couldn’t afford an injury.

by nationalist88 on Aug 8, 2010 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Begins and Ends with QB

Wheel of Location, Turn Turn Turn. Tell us the location that we will play.
Contributor to Lighthouse Hockey not sure if I'm the Sniper or the Enforcer.

by Mark D on Aug 7, 2010 4:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I would add Revis to that as well.

by Crackback on Aug 7, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not so much for me. The question isn’t whether the team will get the same level of play out of backups. That won’t happen in most spots. The question is whether the team can get good play out of the position. Wilson and Cromartie have the potential to be one of the best duos on their own at corner.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on Aug 7, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unless the replacement can shut down #1s all by himself, whoever the replacement is is a big time drop off.

by Crackback on Aug 7, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

No question. Just like Pouha was a dropoff from Jenkins. There will always be a dropoff. The tackle position wasn’t a liability, though.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on Aug 7, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was but it wasn’t as drastic as most of us thought it would be. But the scheme wasnt based on Jenkins’ abilities either. Its going to be a lot harder for us to creep all those DBs up to the line of scrimmage and shit down opposing passing games without being sure that the coverage will hold up.

Are we really going to feel comfortable with lets say Cro locked up solo on BMarsh on 3rd and long, while we blitz the house?

by Crackback on Aug 7, 2010 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Any 3-4 defense is absolutely built around the nose tackle.

You’re giving an isolated example. Again, I’m accepting that there is a dropoff. The question is whether the new starters would still do a good job over the long haul. With Wilson and Cromartie, I think the answer is yes.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on Aug 7, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re right, the 34 D requires good NT play. But our specific heavy blitzing scheme requires Revis. Without him we have to play a different game.

Yes i cheated a bit and used the most dangerous WR in the beginning of our schedule to make a point. But, even still, most #1 wideouts, even those on bad teams with bad QBs, can do serious damage. And they usually win their battles and command double-teams.

I like Cro if he has safety help so he can gamble a bit. But I’m not comfortable at all with him (or anyone not named Revis) one-on-one against the most dangerous player on the opposing offense.

So if its 3rd and long, and that safety thats normally crowding the LOS with Revis at corner is now playing over the top, the entire identity of our D shifts. No longer are there more guys than can be handled at the LOS. The QB is less threatened, and doesn’t rush through his progressions or his throws. The coverage isn’t as tight because, lets face it, Revis isn’t out there. And the #1 receiver becomes #1 option again, and will probably win more battles than he loses.

by Crackback on Aug 7, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

John B— are you serious? Get Revis into camp.

by Gideon Jay on Aug 8, 2010 1:00 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree with QB, but I’m not really concerned with TE or S. We’ve got a whole bunch of receivers out there, so if Keller goes down then it sucks but I think the WR corps will be able to make up for it enough that it won’t be an issue. At safety, Eric Smith’s about as good a backup as any team’s got, plus we can also have Lowery fill in—plus Donovan Warren probably will make the team.

After QB, the next most concerning injury would be the anything beyond more than one injury on the OL. If one guy gets injured, then Slauson has shown promise and I’m not too worried about him filling in. But beyond him… Turner or Hunter? They haven’t really been great as 6th linemen, so lord knows how they’d do if forced to play on the actual OL.

After that would be an injury to the RB corps—specifically to Shonn Greene. My faith in LDT to be a featured back at this point is close to none, and there’s just no way Joe McKnight is ready. Chauncey Washington… is he still on the team? I haven’t heard a god damned thing about him pretty much ever. If Greene goes down, then Sanchez’s development as a passer becomes that much more important.

by Exystence on Aug 7, 2010 6:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Just Leonhard.

Hidden intellectual glue of the defense. A lot of hard-hitting career plays on a guy with a small frame.

"...where they don't play with a shot clock." - C. Sager

by kv on Aug 7, 2010 9:34 PM EDT reply actions  

What makes him intellectual? Thought he was more of a small guy that uses his toughness and athleticism to overcome his size disadvantage.

by Crackback on Aug 7, 2010 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New York Jets.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
New Weekly FanPost Idea:
058_sione_pouha--300x300_small
Weekly Caption Contest (no, this has nothing to do with fanshots) Week #1
Revis_island_small
Bro Namath Needs Your Help (Unrec please)
Small
The Natural
058_sione_pouha--300x300_small
What is a Fanshot, and why you should care (Plus MS Paint). (unrec the sucker because we need to shorten the reccomended posts)

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Gangreen-large_small John B

Great-british-events-flag_small David_Wyatt

Staff Writers

Revis_island_small Bro Namath

943_small dvdvil

Wayne_chrebet1_small GangGreenMag

Haters_small bobdolethesnapplelady

Santana_moss_small Jeff W.

Moderators

Revis_christ_small Judgegavel

Return_of_the_jet-i_small MachlinT

Jets_small Tamarack

058_sione_pouha--300x300_small rexthejet