The Darrelle Revis Holdout: Making Sense of It All
Like a lot of Jets/NFL fans, I've spent a healthy amount of time squeezing juice out of Twitter/ProFootballTalk/GangGreenNation/any other news outlet for information about the Darrelle Revis situation. I've come across a lot of opinions and seen several sets of facts. I've noticed a lot of fans are confused and mis-informed about the situation, so I figured I would set the facts straight as non-biased as I could.
Let's begin with how it started. In early March or so, the Jets approach Revis in a seemingly generous fashion to discuss a possible long-term deal, because Revis was scheduled to make $1 million in 2010, vastly underpaying the league's top defensive player.
Now, the Jet's idea was to give him a nice raise so he doesn't look like he's playing for so little. Revis thinks it's time to cash in. Therein lies the basis for the disagreement; Revis thinks it's him time to be the top paid CB at around $16 Million a season, and the Jets are all like "WTF, we were just being nice! This is like going over our house for dinner and complaining about the food!"
The Jets, in an uncapped season, could just stomach the bill and pay Revis. Yet the issue lies not in the rumored $40 million dollar difference between the sides (Jets are offering $120 and Revis wants $160 over 10 years). This is, and has always been, about guaranteed money. In the NFL, the only kind of money is guaranteed money. As I am learning more and more, the only "true" form of guaranteed money is in the form of a "signing bonus", which is money paid to the player as soon as he signs the contract.
In the current CBA, this unique uncapped year only allows for money to be guaranteed against skill OR injury. Mangold's contract is guaranteed against injury; D'Brickashaw Ferguson's is guaranteed against skill. It was the player's choice. If you're wondering why Brick, a top 5 LT in the NFL, chose to guarantee against skill, it's not because he's worried about sucking all of a sudden. He probably has an insurance plan with a private agency that protects him.
Which is exactly why Revis is still sticking to his guns. He knows the Jets can be creative and give him pretty much any kind of contract. He wants to play football; he doesn't want to be a distraction.
Continued after the Jump:
For a second, let's see where Darrelle is coming from. Most guys in the league would be happy to be on a roster. How many of those guys actually are able to start, and perform at such a high level that you get a contract extension? Darrelle knows his value, and he thinks this is his chance to land his huge deal; it's what every player in the league dreams of. He only gets one shot to get this right. Why do you think players want to win so badly? Because they're competitive, and, more importantly, players on winning teams make more money. It's that simple. Sorry to disappoint, but Revis or any other player really doesn't care that Jets fans haven't had a championship in 40+ years.
Let's shift to the Jets. They never intended for this to happen; they we're trying to get a fair deal done, but they've opened Pandora's Box. While Darrelle deserves big money, he DOES have three years left. If this was 2012, Darrelle would be making 16 million a season and would be in camp right now. In the Jet's eyes, they're doing him a favor threat they don't have to. Technically, they're right. He did hold out for this contract. Most player wait until their fourth, fifth, or sixth year for that monster deal. Revis has three years under his belt.
After all of this, let's put this into perspective. Revis is not going to be traded. Period. The Jets have no reason to, because he is probably the most valuable player in the league right now. In today's age of aerial attacks, CB's are in more demand and harder to find than ever. At his age, he is probably more desirable to GM's than a Peyton Manning. What would the Jets get, two first rounder's to get some linebacker who could bust? Please.
Finally, I am going to stick with my gut. I believe Revis WILL play this season. I just can't imagine someone with that much dedication to what he does to watch everyone play while he chills at home. Also, there's the possibility his skills could diminish is he waits that long, especially if there is no football in 2011. I think a short term solution is the best route, just have the Jets hand out a bunch of guaranteed money to buy time to figure out a longer deal. Woody has the money. The only to reach an agreement is for both sides to give a little. Probably meet somewhere in the middle, around 13 or 14 million. Or load his contract with incentives. Something. There is a way, it's a matter of who has the cooler head and realize that no one is going to get what they want, because in life, you almost never do.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Post Ryan
While I’m inclined to agree with you on every single level, the cynic in me is sooooo friggin worried it’s not even funny. I won’t be happy until mommy and daddy stop fighting. lol
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t his contract up after this season and the Jets have the right to exercise an option to add two more years?
So if he plays this season and suffers a catastrophic injury (a la Leon), what are the odds that the Jets pick up that option? Wouldn’t they just try to negotiate a new/different contract instead? What are the odds that he would get close to the contract that he’s seeking? And is it worth it for him to risk it all for a measly $1M this season?
Well, there’s 3 years left. He could opt out, and the Jets could buy it back for 10 million a season. Or he could just play it out. Or accept the jets offer on the table.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought he gave up his right to opt out of the contract when he held out.
Get busy winning or get busy losing.
by GangGreenMag on Aug 31, 2010 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions
No, the 10 million a season is no longer guaranteed.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Hell of a contract he held out for Rookie year, right? Take a look at the Schwartz/Feinsod article I just posted. I think it’s really relevant to the the matter in question.
It’s sorta relevant, but not really. He outplayed the contract nonetheless.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions
But what if Schwartz & Feinsod are handling Revis's hold out fees as well?
Wouldn’t that be kind of… WRONG? lol I mean I don’t think my boss should be paying my speeding tickets that I incurred while rushing deliveries for him…
The fee’s are just a number. They’re meaningless. The Jets will include them in a new contract.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry Ryan, but...
I think it was a 6yr deal that voided to a 4yr upon him reaching certain incentives, which he did in his first year.
So this is the last year of his contract, but the Jets can opt to buy and additional 2 years for 20M (5M in 2011, 15M 2012). But because he missed mandatory time, that portion is no longer guaranteed.
The 20 million he was supposed to get over the next 2 years isn’t guaranteed anymore. Florio mad an article that Revis was going to end the hold out Aug 10th or at the start of training camp so that he can opt out of his contract, and essentially making him a RFA, but once he held out, he no longer had that option to opt out.
Get busy winning or get busy losing.
Exactly. But that was Revis’s choice.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions
oh ok, I thought you were saying he could still opt out if he wanted.
Get busy winning or get busy losing.
by GangGreenMag on Aug 31, 2010 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions
He opts out, then the Jets buy it back. And that money was supposed to be guaranteed before he held out.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions
you forgot the details that
Revis was already paid handsomely up to this year so the $1 million isn’t truly reflective of his current contract.
You also don’t discuss how even though it’s an uncapped year, the new CBA could have some retroactive effects upon this year’s cap. Which is why it would still be foolish to give Revis whatever he wants.
He made 15 million in three seasons. Nice money, but he still outplayed it.
Im not saying he should get whatever he wants. I think a short term, one year fix is the best solution
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
I would think that's tougher then it sounds.
Considering there is for all purposes 3 years left on his contract. It’s not like they could give him $16 this year and keep the final two year option the same as it was. This would be a 3 year $48 mil deal which he would want guarenteed and then skip town after that to make $20 mil/year. The Jets want long term or the current deal, not to give Revis a hunk of money then have him skip town to the highest bidder while he’s still in his prime.
And Revis doesn’t want the longest term deal because he knows it’s unlikely to stick for all the years without a ton of guarenteed money.
I agree with some of the comments made already
People keep mentioning he is only getting 1 million this year which is not telling the whole story. I do agree he has out played his contract but that was the risk with signing a 6 year contract. He could of got paid 6 million this year if he structured hist contract way.
Lets say Revis has his demands met and gets 50 mil (for example)guaranteed, what happens in three years? This is the second time in three years he has held out in a contract dispute why won’t it happen again? Now even if the Jets want (they don’t have to they chose to) to pay him, I think the Jets have to becareful about giving him to much to soon. Lets say another corner gets 18 million a year down the road, will Revis start holding out and demand more money? I love Revis he is a great player but this pattern is alarming. IMO any new contract can’t leave Revis with all the leverage because this will happen again in a couple years based on past behaivor.
"Sorry bro, he Jason Bourned me"- Drama
Which is exactly why Revis is still sticking to his guns. He knows the Jets can be creative and give him pretty much any kind of contract. He wants to play football; he doesn’t want to be a distraction.
huh? He’s sticking to his guns because he doesn’t want to be a distraction?
If you think that line was retarded, you must’ve missed this gem:
“he is probably the most valuable player in the league right now”
by nationalist88 on Aug 31, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Give me a player, who, if they hit the free agent market, would be more coveted.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Chris Johnson, Patrick Willis, DeMarcus Ware, Aaron Rodgers, Phillip Rivers, Drew Brees, Tony Romo, Adrian Peterson, Joe Thomas, Ryan Clady, D’Brickashaw Ferguson, Jared Allen, Jake Long, and Ben Roethlisberger.
But those are just the obvious ones. We could debate plenty of others.
by nationalist88 on Aug 31, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
If you think that a left tackle is worth more than Revis you are not worth arguing with.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions
No, I’m not saying a left tackle is worth more than Mevis. There are at least FIVE left tackles worth more than Mevis.
by nationalist88 on Aug 31, 2010 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions
All of the tackles you mentioned were drafted in the past five years. They’re good tackles, but it’s not like they’re once-in-a-generation talent. Revis is the best since Deion.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Says who?
You? Revis has had one great year. Coincidentally he didn’t have it until the best defensive coach in the NFL coached his defense.
and don’t even try to put RB’s into the same category of importance. Darrelle is the best defensive player in the NFL. So elimainate all defensive players. Tom Brady and Manning are old. Brees isn’t young. In fact, any big time-QB is easier to find than a players like Revis.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Best defensive player in the NFL? Lmao, not according to the NFL! Charles Woodson says hi.
by nationalist88 on Aug 31, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions
The fact that you actually believe that Charles Woodson is a better player just destroyes any credibility you claim to have.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
no it doesn't.
The fact that you are so homeristic that you can’t see why he would call a perennial all pro player for the last decade better than a guy who had one great season, it destroys any credibility you claim to have.
Johnson and Peterson are dynamic backs who change offenses, can take over games, and give opposing coordinators nightmares.. Mevis is a great player in Rex’s system. Big difference.
Are you really suggesting that guys who throw 35 TD passes every year are less important to a team than a cover corner who prevented 6, at the most, from being scored? Or to keep it simple and less speculative, do yourself a favor: add up the number of Superbowl titles won by the top 10 corners in football (you can even list Mevis as #1 if you like). Then add the total number of Superbowls won by the top 10 QB’s in football. Y’know, since we’re talking about importance to a team. Go ahead and drop those figures on me so I finally comprehend why the corner position is so critical to our Championship aspirations. I’ll wait.
by nationalist88 on Aug 31, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions
At $60 million guaranteed -10 years at $16 million the only one with any
interest would be the Wizard by the Bay Al Davis where players go and are rarely heard from again.
by Putnan Prince on Aug 31, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Outplaying Ones Contract
This concept has no barring on players who sign a contract. He agreed to a contract based on what he felt he deserved as compared to the landscape of contracts give to his position and draft position. You can’t outplay your contract, you can do a great job and deserve a raise when the time comes for you to get one, when your contract is up. In non-contract situations you have more of a choice because you have not signed something that is legally binding.
The alternatives are playing less then you’re capable of which can hurt your future potential or retiring. Revis should retire and find another job which he can make what he deserves. Heck retire and go to the UFL, Arena Football, or CFL. Try to resurrect the XFL or even try a different sport. The point being, he is not doing the only job the skill set he has worked for can do, so if he doesn’t like the situation he is in in the NFL, then try something else.
To bad Farve is still not your QB
Farve would just tell him to be a man and live up to the contract he signed just like he did to Javon Walker
Is this a joke? Because Favre is making up to 20 mil this season. For holding a franchise hostage.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions
One word explains it all
Greed.
You signed a contract, the Jets are willing to negotiate an extension. Play the freaking game while you’re negotiating that extension. Nothing is changing the fact that you signed the original contract and you’re making a paltry $1M this season.
Man up and honor your commitment.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free
Why should he honor his when teams don’t have to? One play and his life’s work is over.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Thats usually why these guys make more in a season then average people make in their lifetime.
If there is guaranteed money on the contract they will receive it even if they are cut.
"Sorry bro, he Jason Bourned me"- Drama
Yeah. but the Jets aren’t offering enough guaranteed dollars.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
One play and his life’s work is over.
That’s also true for the lowest paid player in the league, not a valid argument for holding out for a fortune.
Go Devils
Go Jets
Like sports betting? Sign up with centsports and do it for free
The lowest paid players also understand that they probably aren’t going to be in the NFL for the long haul and their jobs are literally secure on a day-to-day basis.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Enough?
What exactly is enough? He is not guaranteed enough. He does not make enough. Enough for what? If I hear one more former football player/analyst say that he needs to do whats best for his family I will pray for a meteor to strike out planet in 2012 so I can be put out of my misery. If any of these players wanted to do what was best for their family the would by modest houses and cars while only making the so called puny 3 million a year they make. Enough? I understand a team can cut him at any moment barring a catastrophic injury but whats to say he that after he makes his guaranteed money he doesnt just up an retire. Bottom line is, there are a lot of players who are the best at their positions who do not get paid that way.
If you actually read my article, this is about GUARANTEED MONEY. THE JETS HAVE OFFERED NO SECURITY. That is what they mean by “best for their family.” So if they get hurt, he still has money, because these guys leave school early and often come from rough backgrounds. Darrelle isn’t holding out for 3 extra million a season. He’s holding out for better security.
Contributing Writer - GangGreenNation.com
Marty Brodeur - Stealing Rangers' lunch money since 1990
by Ryan Alfieri on Aug 31, 2010 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions

by 























