Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

LaDainian Tomlinson Wants to Start

While one LT is in the news for all the wrong reasons, the other feels he can start at running back for the Jets.

"I think at this point in my career, people put this label and this title on you once you get to a certain age: 'Yeah, he has to be a backup now.' I don't believe that. I absolutely don't believe that," Tomlinson, 31 next month, said Thursday. "You determine your role on the football field, and that's what the Jets have been so great about, allowing me to do that.

"They didn't put a label on me at all. They didn't say 'You know what? You're going to be a backup.' They said, 'No, you're going to prove what you can do on the football field,' and that's all I can ask."


It's certainly the right approach to allow everybody to compete for the starting job. Tomlinson is going to be on the roster. If he is the best man, he should be the starter. I still can't hide my skepticism, though. I don't think people are expecting him to be a backup because of his age. It has more to do with his production declining so much that he wasn't even coming close to rushing for the league average per carry despite having a passing game so good it forced defenses to play nickel in non passing downs.

Comment 74 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Gang Green Nation

Flight Connections 05-07-12

May 2012 by dvdvil - 12 comments

Peyton Manning Discussion Thread

Mar 2012 by John B - 215 comments

Joe McKnight: Stay or Go?

Jan 2012 by John B - 22 comments

LaDainian Tomlinson: Stay or Go?

Jan 2012 by John B - 28 comments

Flight Connections 01-20-12

Jan 2012 by dvdvil - 15 comments

Comments

Display:

I have to admit, this IS a little disconcerting. When we first signed him, for basically the same amount of money that TJ was due, I speculated that he would be the starter. I thought it had to do with name-recognition and PSL sales. I was against the acquisition initially because I believe that LD is shot. After reading some interviews which seemed to show LD to be more accepting of a limited role, I changed my opinion. Then I read about how hard he’s working to prepare for the season; how he dropped ten pounds to try to regain some of that explosiveness, working out over here despite the fact that his wife had just given birth to the child they had long struggled to conceive. I began to believe that LD bought in, I believed t hat he was willing to play Robin to Greene’s Batman.

This makes me worry. This makes me worry that the pouty faced, sideline bike rider, is going to throw a tantrum when he’s not named the starter. This makes me worry that he will be named the starter, to the detriment of the team, with the hope that his name will sell some more tickets.

by Crackback on May 8, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions  

I bet

Rex WILL name him the starter, just to slow Greene down and pace him for the season. He is going to use LT a bit like TJ, to challenge Greeene. Right now Greene has sugar plums dancing in his head, but I’m not sure Rex is going to go that way to start. If he gives Greene the huge green light and Greene struggles in anyway (fumbles or blocking), there is no way left but down. My guess is that Rex genuinely is thinking of a 50/50 situation to begin, just to give Greene room to grow, and there is the distinct possibility that LT will start.

I understand that the Greene/TJ mix probably wasn’t going to be a good one, but elite atheletes like LT are NOT going to understand why it is they are being passed up. Think Jordan in Washington. The problem is, LT IS going to have some pretty good success. With this OL he is going to get 3 free yards, and he is going to be a nice outlet receiver. It’s going to be even harder for him to tell that he’s on the wrong side of the hill. Let’s just pray that Greene starts out dominant, and this isn’t even an issue. There are alot of egos on that side of the ball right now, especially after Holmes returns.

by kv on May 8, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't worry, be happy

If he did not want to start I would worry, He is a professional who should want to be first string, after all he is a HOF’er and he could be resting on his laurels but he is not. The fire is still in the belly. He will not pout, this is why we have Rex.

by viguy007 on May 8, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there's definitely some truth to your point about PSLs.

Tomlinson, a surefire Hall of Famer, is sure to sell some extra tickets, especially as he gets close to more historic numbers. If he were to fully embrace a reserve/short yardage roll, you’d have to imagine he could still very much excel, even with a diminished skill set. This will certainly be an interesting story line to watch unfold.

Whoa, whoa, whoa. There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Now you take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato. Baby, you've got a stew goin'!

by Chad Henne is Your New Bicycle on May 8, 2010 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

At first I was a bit concerned, but..

LD has been around too long without character issues for them to suddenly develop. When he said this, he doesn’t mean “I want more carries” he is just trying to gain back some respect he lost last year. I guess it is only fair to have an open competition between Greene and LD. But we have to remember, it is only Greene’s second year playing, even if LD beats him out for the starting role this year, Greene will get the carries, and will get the experience he needs to be our starter sometime in the future (probably next year).

by VinnyG917 on May 8, 2010 11:32 AM EDT reply actions  

if he can earn it this guy was a fantastic back

by dreaux on May 8, 2010 12:28 PM EDT reply actions  

but when backs lose it, they lose it fast. There is no graceful decline usually. And they have a really hard time seeing it themselves because their vision on the field is better than ever. Its just that the hole closes a little too quickly (must have been someone elses fault).

by kv on May 8, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't worry

Him seeing it isn’t as important as the coaches seeing it. Rex gave the bulk of the carries down the stretch and in the playoffs to a rookie even though he had a veteran that had ran for !400 yards, and has been known in the past to sulk and disrupt the locker room. He could see who was getting the job done and thats who got the ball. Let’s assume Greene averages 5 YPC, the only way LT is getting the starting nod over Greene or getting the bulk of carries will be if he is averaging better than that number. If he does HOORAY for us! Ask Kerry Rhodes if Rex cares about the name on the Back of the Jersey.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

Rex is excellent at judging players based on current performance, not history

by VinnyG917 on May 8, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that LT is going to have a monster year. He has great hands and is going to catch everything that Sanchez needs to dump off. Shotty might be so impressed with his catching ability, that we might see LT lining up at the slot. Can you picture the WR’s, Keller, LT and Greene all on the field at the same time. Shotty must be on cloud 9.

Not to mention, LT is a touchdown machine. The offense will be operating at midfield a half dozen times a game. He will rush for 700 plus yards. Everything will be fine.

Jim Clancy

by jimsjets on May 8, 2010 12:39 PM EDT reply actions  

dream teams can have their own particular difficulties. If the team is winning, everything is cool, but put three loses in a row and everyone thinks that they aren’t being given enough touches.

I can see it working out exactly as you say, and the team gets 11 wins, but egos are part of the equation. LT has some pretty high expectations on what his chances are to be FAIRLY judged against Greene. Unfortunately, what he thinks he is capable of and what Rex sees might not jibe – cue resentment.

by kv on May 8, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t want Tomlinson on the Jets if he didn’t want to start. Any and every player should want that, especially a future Hall of Famer. I’m not sure he’s done as so many think. Yes, the Chargers had a prolific passing attack last year, but that;s because they had one of the worst run blocking lines in the entire NFL. In their first game of the year against the Raiders, they lost three starters from the O-line to injury. Tomlinson himself suffered a high ankle sprain and missed the next 3-4 games. As for a low average per carry, Tomlinson’s (3.1 or so) was just about the same as the dynamic Darren Sproles (3.4 or so). You could have put most any NFL runningback on that team and he would have been in for a horrible season. Let’s not be so quick to bury this guy. The circumstances from last year, and his career body of work, have earned him that.

by jfr1972 on May 8, 2010 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

but this is the thing

let’s say you are right. And LT is a pretty dynamic back. Rex wants to ground and pound. And we have a pretty big potential in the passing attack. How many carries do you want LT to ideally have? If this offense is really hitting on all cylinders, what is the profile? I did see Greene have some success in combination, but isn’t there something about his running style that says: give me 25 touches, I’ll get stronger as the game goes?

Even if LT is everything he thinks he is, I’m not sure the offense can or should accomodate him. And yes, its cool to think of him as a receiver, but we have receivers, tons of them, and the truth of the matter is this has to be a running team because that let’s the defense rest.

by kv on May 8, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

KV....

Because this team is a running team, Tomlinson will get his touches. No ifs ands or buts about it. Trust me, he’ll be happy in this offense. We run, run, run, pass. We are going to have a field day on the ground with these two backs. Just wait and see.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can see that

The only problem is if we have a few tough losses (and the start of the year is difficult). There is no Holmes and maybe no Edwards (for game one). There is the learning curve of the new defensive guys, and there is a new, possibly rookie left guard. It may take some time for the whole thing to gell, and that could result in a few losses. Losing does things to the internal dynamics of a team, people’s expectations start to rub against each other.

The problem is: If LT has really high expectations for himself and what he will be allowed to do, and if the team comes out of the gate a little disjointed, the one big happy party might go another way.

I thoroughly believe that by the end of the year everything will be sorted out and both the O and the D will be flying high, but the first 6 games might be pretty rocky.

by kv on May 8, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree....

but KV, they did say that about us last year too.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

it was a pretty uneven season

last year, and if a few teams showed up at the end we all would be calling the moves this year “a big overhaul” instead of “not resting on our laurels, and going for it all”.

All I’m saying is, there are a lot of fancy fish in this pot, and the heat is probably going to be up after the first 5 or 6 games. It might make some really interesting soup, and Rex is really going to be a star to pull it off. I do believe he is a star.

by kv on May 8, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

In all honesty...

I don’t think it will happen to us but every once and a while when the Kool-Aid runs low I have flashbacks of that Lakers team with Karl Malone and Peyton. I guess I should relax they did make it to the finals. In Rex we trust!

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank God...

Somebody finally looked at the Stats between Sproles and Tomlinson. Why people don’t see this, I don’t understand. It is part of the o-line’s responsibility to help him get those yards. I mean what is everyone smoking here? If you call yourself a fan, be a fan and read the stats. There is more to Tomlinson and his woes the past couple of seasons than the “he’s old and lost a step” declaration. Let’s see what he does. And like JFR said, if Tomlinson didn’t want to start, I wouldn’t want him on the team. He won’t perform. Everyone on this team wants to win. Buying into the system ALSO means understanding your role. People on this team understand their role. The people that didn’t like their roles (Rhodes and TJ [yes, he didn’t like the idea of featuring Greene as the starter this season as was cut, end of story]) ARE GONE. If you don’t like the System, Rex will cut you or de-activate you like he did a certain #3 WR.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

first of all, Sproles had less that 100 attempts, so his stats are a bit skewed by low data, and .4 yards is still significant. Among runners with over 200 attempts LT was the worst in the league, with only Kevin Smith of Detroit statistically very close (3.4). One would think that if Sproles had another 120 attempts he would have broken a few long runs – his specialty – and drove his average up to something more respectable. Was the SD OL that bad? With a strong passing attack you would think that one wouldn’t have the worst +200 attempt back in the league.

But maybe you are right, its hard to tell.

by kv on May 8, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

to add...

Sproles’s long run was 21 yards, a very low, un-Sproles-like number having nothing to do with the OL, and it definitely effected his yd/g.

by kv on May 8, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly...

sounds like blocking down field, and in general, and play calling led to the weakness of that run game. Let’s just see what he does in at least the first 4 games. Then the next 4 games when the passing attack gets back Holmes.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

so now SD not only have the worst run-blocking OL but also the worst blocking recievers in the league. Even if you get passed the linebackers there’s nowhere to run. Its a wonder that they have been so successful. And one wonders how Sproles had that 5.4 average the year before.

by kv on May 8, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah...

What I’m ultimately trying to say is there are a number of reasons why the stats are the way they are. But if Both of your RBs had issues breaking a long run, or getting a decent average whether you had low carries are not, then there is something wrong somewhere else… it can’t just be Tomlinson. Sorry if you took it that way. But the truth is the truth.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can accept that...

its just also to be admitted that the reason why sproles didn’t have a big yard average is not necessaryly the SAME reason why LT didn’t.

by kv on May 8, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

okay...

I’ll give you that. But at the end of the day, if Tomlinson was “so bad”, why didn’t they give sproles more touches? I don’t understand the logic over there in SD. They didn’t utilize their running backs well IMO. I know some SD fan will say they did this to pacify Tomlinson because he was a cry baby, but doesn’t the team come first? It’s deeper than Tomlinson losing a step… they just didn’t run, and when they did the o-line didn’t give him a hole to piss in.

There is nothing wrong with both of the backs, it’s that offense and it’s complete shift to the Passing game that screwed everything up. Of course, injuries to the o-line played a major part as well.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll give you that. But at the end of the day, if Tomlinson was "so bad", why didn’t they give sproles more touches?

You’d have to ask Norv Turner, but Tomlinson simply wasn’t effective.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on May 8, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

they probably

didn’t give sproles more touches for a couple of reasons. They weren’t sure that he could physically handle the load (they probably aren’t even sure now), and LT likely had something of a psychological stranglehold over the team. I mean he was their Jordan. Its very hard to move away from that.

Also, remember how many Jet fans were/are freaked out by how Jones kept getting all the carries in the season despite listlessness, similar thing.

I agree in general that the LT difficulties may be systemic to SD, but there is also the convenience that the system in SD could be hiding (or providing the excuse) for LT’s decline. When there is no hole, the dude can say: ‘Man, I was really ready to explode, but noone blocked for me’.

Personally I don’t think he is washed up, but unfortunately is probably just washed up enough to NOT be able to do what his mind thinks he can do. It will be a balancing act.

by kv on May 8, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

Okay KV, let’s just wait until the season starts.

John B, you’re right, but none of the running backs were… i.e. Sproles. In all honesty, I’m just trying to look at this from many angles.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok stat guy...

Explain to me LD’s steep decline in his yards after catch numbers. This stat has everything to do with LD’s speed, elusiveness and ability to break tackles. In a vertical offense like the Bolts’ he should have had much more room to work with underneath. His numbers shouldn’t be declining. That fact they have been declining rapidly over the last 4-5 years speaks volumes. The simple fact is… he’s shot.

by Crackback on May 9, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on cb, he just couldn’t get his rhythm. He’s like that old Chevy in the garage, you have to warm it up for a few minutes before you put it into gear. At around the 20th carry LT would have started breaking tackles left and right.

(Just to note, I don’t think he is “shot” which means he shouldn’t even play, he’s just lost some effectiveness. He’s not an above the rim kind of player right now.)

by kv on May 9, 2010 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's SHOT????! Gasp!!!! Back into the abyss where you hail from!

I won’t agree with this at all. Not even for an instant. And this rapidly declining numbers that you bring up… please post. Declining numbers, sure… Rapidly Declining, I don’t know what you’re talking about.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 9, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm so not reading that...

I’ll take your word for it…

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 9, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

YAC

2007: 9.6
2008: 9.3
2009 7.9

Thats almost a decrease of 1.5 ypc from ‘08 to ’09. Thats a HUGE drop off at a time where the Bolts’ passing game has been its most potent. He’s getting the ball in the flat with enough time to frolick in a meadow. Those numbers should NOT have decreased last year in that offense. Such a steep decline in that area shows that LD has lost two steps.

by Crackback on May 9, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotcha...

Okay. I see it. YAC, YPC, etc…etc…

Yup, it shows that he’s lost a step or two.

I’ll just wait for the season. I’m conceding defeat on this one.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 9, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry but I just wanted to double check those numbers I mentioned. The actual average yards per carry was 3.3 for Tomlinson and 3.7 for Sproles. The differential was still basically the same. Considering that Tomlinson had far more carries, in true rush down &goal line situations, the lower number shouldn’t surprise anyone. Go JETS

by jfr1972 on May 8, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I was just about to post this lol.

Nice correction.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe it will be like last season...

Something that I think I recall Rex doing was not actually exclusively naming TJ a starter. I believe he basically labelled TJ number 1 on the depth chart and Leon was 1A on the depth chart. Basically it was supposed to work out to the hot hand got the bulk of the carries…50/50 split unless one was so effective that the others carries were reduced for that particular game. If you look at the touches (catches + rushing attempts) before Leon’s injury it was pretty close to an even split most times. In games 1-6 LW’s numbers were 19, 16, 13, 8, 12, & 18 touches. TJ’s numbers were 20, 15, 15, 13, 13, & 24. If Rex does this again Tomlinson may end up with his “starter” tag but not necessarilly be the feature back that would get to put the team on his back to will them to victory. Either way, like others here I’d rather have Tomlinson on the team as a guy hungry to be the number 1 guy and not as some guy along for the ride in hopes of latching on just to get a championship if we end up winning it!

by Mac N Cheese on May 8, 2010 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

“You determine your role on the football field, and that’s what the Jets have been so great about, allowing me to do that.

“They didn’t put a label on me at all. They didn’t say ‘You know what? You’re going to be a backup.’ They said, ‘No, you’re going to prove what you can do on the football field,’ and that’s all I can ask.”

This comes off as a Prima Donna? Sounds to me like a guy who knows he had a bad couple of seasons recently and wants to prove to everyone that he is not washed up. Sounds to me like an organization that wants to keep it’s players motivated after a very successful season last year. I don’t get any sense of entitlement from those statements at all.

Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.

by CasanovaWong on May 8, 2010 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

All About the TD's

If LT gets 12 td’s (same as last year) and lets say Greene gets 12 and Keller and three WR’s get 8 each, thats 56 TD and second only to the Saints in last years stats.

Is that production possible?

Jim Clancy

by jimsjets on May 8, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not sure that its all about the TDs

That is to say, the TDs are great, but this isn’t supposed to be a season long high-scoring offense (despite all the weapons). The reason for that is that Rex knows that if his defense is going to be the core strength of the team he really needs a running game to grind up game time to keep his defense fresh. The obvious problem with high scoring offenses is they leave their defense on the field and can have trouble in 4th quarters without a big lead. Plus, I think Rex envisions this defense as a scoring defense, in fact its imperative that they score in his scheme, its the whole point of the confusion and it was a failure of last year’s D.

I think if Rex got his wish the Jets would be a middle of the pack offensive TD team that in 75% of the games ground it out. And his defense would be the top scoring D in the league. The extra fire power they added would be for those games against top-flight offenses like the Colts and Saints where they have to keep up, maybe 4 game out of the year. I think Rex is hoping that Sanchez’s young attacking heart and the new weapons are a kind of turbo boost in particular games, and not all year long.

by kv on May 8, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the real question to ask is regarding LT's last year:

If Greene was the SD back and got +200 carries would he have been about the 50th best back in the league with a 3.3 ave?

I find that hard to believe, but it is possible.

by kv on May 8, 2010 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

That hardly seems the question. Greene is not the type of runner LT or Sproles is. It is likely he would have had more YPC as his style is more geared to power. I think Greene is better than both LT and TJ. If LT is to be believed, the question is would Greene average 5 YPC in SD. if you think he would than the SD O-line angle is over hyped. But if the answer is no than you have to give LT the benefit of the doubt.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can see your point

but LT isn’t the kind of runner Sproles is either. The point is, or at least my point is, IF you are going to try to project what kind of runner LT is going to be in this offense from what he DIDN’T do in SD, then it is fair to ask, what wouldn’t Greene have done there as well.

You very right, Greene is a different runner than LT, it was exactly that he is able to hit the hole and get 5 yards instead of 3, in the mix of some contact that separated him out from TJ. LT is more a shifty runner with moderate power. The question is, can that kind of runner (with high mileage) still have the separation from the line of scrimage that makes 3 yards 5 yards. The OL was really good last year, but that in part was predicated on Faneca’s super fluid runblocking. It was not like these guys were blowing HUGE holes for the backs in a power game, they were with great timing opening holes. It was precisely Greene’s combination of 2nd gear acceration and size that made it successful.

The way that I look at it, LT will be pretty good because he doesn’t HAVE to be very good. The offense doesn’t need him and he can capitalize on defensive overplays. But I seriously doubt whether he has the – let’s call it fourth step – explosion that will separate him from the line regularly. LT always was a game of inches back in my mind. He had a way of just changing the angle and shifting his gears to turn nothing into something downfield.

We’ll see. Those are just my thoughts.

by kv on May 8, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why didn't I concur?

Agreed. Somebody posted a stat, (I think from the site that ranks the players in all the weird stats), showed where RB were getting hit first and how much they gained after first contact. TJ was at the top getting 2 yrds before first contact and near the bottom at yrds after first contact while L T was getting hit near or behind the line of scrimage and much higher than TJ on yards after contact, (I think he was 16 to TJ 30something, sorry i cant find the stat and be accurate I can’t remember the site, its the same one that ranked Faneca last at guard). I think that and the chip on LT’s shoulder should mean some good numbers from him.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

oops!

Just did some research and found that i misrepresented LT yards after contact. while TJ did have just 2.1 YCo LT was actually worst at 1.9. I hate spewing out fake stats so I am sorry I didn’t check before i posted
http://profootballfocus.com/articles.php?tab=articles&arc=&id=162

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he has a genuine shot

His only competition is one man. Granted it’s a young man with an enormous burst and upside but if LT is ever due a resurgence to his old rushing days it’s behind the Jets O line and Tony Richardson. Unless whoever replaces Faneca is a downgrade at run blocking.

by Bro Namath on May 8, 2010 2:37 PM EDT reply actions  

LD's ego

I don’t think we need to worry about LT, as far as causing anything bad in the locker room. The man came here because it gave him the best chance to get deep in the playoff/to the superbowl, and because we have the best OL in the game, especially now that Faneca is gone. I know a lot of Jets fans don’t agree with releasing Faneca, but his pass-blocking skills eroded so badly that we couldn’t keep him as a starter, and we were not going to pay him 7.5 mil to be a backup. I believe that our D will be even stronger this year, especially now that we have a legit nickel corner. Our D is a man-up defense, and that is Revis’s, Cro’s, and Wilson’s strengths. That along with our pass-rush upgrades, our WR upgrades, and hopefully Gholston working out at DE, will make us a force to be reckoned with not just in the AFC, but the entirety of the NFL. Those talking heads who don’t predict us going deep in the playoffs(don’t want to jinx us by saying the big game), will be eating their words come January 2011, and are just haters. I’m looking at you Micheal Lombardi….you Pats D##K rider………..

by Revis24 on May 8, 2010 4:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Totally agree

its funny, the person who disrupted a locker room when his carries and role was reduced was the guy who left. TJ was directly responsible for the Chicago trading Benson when they tried to give Benson a greater role. To his credit he never did that here. Maybe it was because this Offense gave so many opportunities to run.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW

KV, the Chargers weren’t 31st in rushing because of LT, they were that because Norv is a pass first guy, rarely gave Tomlinson a chance to get in a rhythm, and their OL is pretty bad at run-blocking. I suspect the Chargers will be in the bottom half of the league as far as running the football is concerned again. Look at Norv’s years when he was coaching at other places as well, the only team that was great at running where he coaching was Dallas in the mid 90’s. They had the best Offensive Line in the game at that time, their OL was HUGE compared to every other team’s DL, and OL. They also had Emmit Smith, maybe you have heard of him. I’m not trying to patronize you kv, just saying. Norv Turner hasn’t had a succesful run offense since then.

by Revis24 on May 8, 2010 4:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I definitely agree...

I’ve been going back and forth with KV all day on this… I think its more to it than just Tomlinson losing a step.

GANG GREEN ALL DAY!
You see, it's not about how you won the game, it's about how you played the game.... there's a difference.

by King A! on May 8, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed...

but its not a choice, either:

1). LT has lost a step.
2). Turner and the OL went away from the run.

It is most likely BOTH 1 and 2. And 2 probably had something to do a little bit with 1. He’s not "shot’ but he probably isn’t what he thinks he is either.

by kv on May 8, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

KV, the Chargers weren’t 31st in rushing because of LT, they were that because Norv is a pass first guy.

I keep hearing this, and it doesn’t add up. San Diego having a good passing game was an advantage to LT, not a detriment. He faced no eight man fronts and in many instances played against subpackages with defensive backs in for linemen and linebackers.

Maybe his blocking wasn’t great, but blocking isn’t everything. He was one of the worst statistically in the league at getting yardage after contact and making people miss.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on May 8, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was one of the worst in YCo, at 1.9 YCo but TJ was barely better at 2.1. Yet TJ was even worse at making people miss,(barely).

From ProFootballFocus.com:
If any statistic represents the nosedive in play of one of those starters, Ladainian Tomlinson, then it is the 1.9 yards he averaged after contact to tie for the poorest mark in the NFL. Tomlinson’s poor showing in just about all of these categories goes to reinforce what the naked eye could see: He was a shell of his former greatness in ‘09. It will be interesting to see what he can produce in 2010 behind arguably the league’s best O-line.

The man he replaced in the Jets’ backfield, Jones, didn’t fare much better in YCo per attempt last season, despite recording nearly double the total rushing yards. Jones gained just 2.1 yards after contact per rush, and actually finds himself ranked one place below Tomlinson in the final Elusive Rating.(Take out the Buf game and the numbers look even worst for TJ).

Seeing where they ranked in YCo and Elusiveness yet TJ it is hard to argue that blocking doesn’t make a difference. As you say SD saw far less 8 men fronts and faced more nickel packages and smaller defenders yet LT was getting hit a yard earlier. Where would TJ be getting hit if the Jets faced the same Def fronts and schemes as SD?

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, LT could never get a rhythm

This is really what all great backs who are used to near 30 carries say, and I think it really is right. Great backs need to pile up the carries so by the end of the game they know how to capitalize, they grow stronger.

The PROBLEM is (sorry for the caps), LT is not going to get the carries he need to develop a rhythm here either. Unless Greene gets hurt or absolutely sucks. LT averaged 14 carries. Now with 14 carries, he couldn’t get a rhythm. In Shonn Greene’s last four full games when he was really contributing he averaged about 18 carries. How many carries do you imagine that LT is going to get??? More importantly, how many does he think he’s going to get? More than 14?

What is likely to happen – because by the end of the year Greene is going to be superior – LT’s carries are going to be down, less than last year. He’s going to be saying to himself: “Damn I thought they was going giving me a chance”, “Damn, if I was allowed to ‘get my rhythm’ I could really dominate.”

If the Jets are winning, who cares, but if they have a mixed season, well…

Sure, I can accept Turner being the reason why LT had a weak year, but he isn’t necessarily the reason why he was so far down. If you want to examine your argument, would the answer have been the same if he had averaged 2.9 yards a game? It’s all Turner’s fault. Yes, its Turner’s fault, but the question is, what can you on your own too? And if you’re point is, once he gets a great OL he’s going to really rock. Well, the judgment isn’t how good LT is, but how good he is with this OL compared to Greene.

As I’ve mentioned before, I think Greene has a runnjng style that would really benefit from carries. its the power-speed runners that really start to heat it up at around 20 – 25 carries. Which back, LT or SG do we want to have enough carries to “get into a rhythm”. I say SG.

And yes, I’ve heard of Emmit Smith, I’ve also heard of LT. And if Turner had the LT of old, he may have structured his offense differently.

by kv on May 8, 2010 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Greene 18- 20. LT 12-15

That’s what I want to see with SG 1 and LT 2. I think LT can get his extra touches in the pass game. I agree with you Greene needs the extra carries.

As far as last 4 weeks SG 16.75 carries, Tj 18. Playoffs: SG 18, Tj 15.

We will pass more next season but there should be enough carries to keep LT happy and like i said, he will get touches in the pass game where Greene won’t.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks gj

When I mentioned Greene’s carry average, I was referring to his “last full 4 games” so I left out the last playoff game, and took the last four which probably measure what Greene could contribute at max last year, it was 17.x or so.

As for LT getting passes to make him happy, we are not passing alot, and every pass that goes to him will be one that doesn’t go to Holmes, Keller, BE or Coch. LT in the pass-happy SD offense averaged 1.4 receptions a game. To repeat that, Turner had the great pass-catching LT to use, and he got him the ball 1.4 times a game. (It must have been the OL, right?)

So, LT who has gone on the record saying that he was disappointed with 14 carries a game and 1.4 receptions, has come to the Jets and hopes to get MORE carries, but we think that he’s going to be happy because he’s such an amazing receiver he’s going to get 4 or more receptions in this run-oriented, receiver-stacked offense.

I’m telling you, I don’t see where he fits in, other than as an insurance policy in case Greene puts the ball on the ground, or gets injured (a possibility).

by kv on May 8, 2010 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember though we didn’t have a pass catching rb last year. For a young QB that safety valve is important it cuts down on forcing it into coverage. RB screens were also off the menu last year once LW went down. Sanchez could have benefited from the checkdown rb out the backfield last year. Addai had 51 catches for the Colts and Bush had 47 for the Saints. I hope we are not passing as much as them but LT can get 2-2.5 catches a game and that shouldn’t kill the # of passes that the receivers get.

His comments seemed to reflect the change in blocking that became more pass blocking emphasized not just the reduction in carries. I think he’ll be happy with lowered expectations, better o-line and coach that doesn’t think his done.

He is a good insurance policy but I think you discount the value of a good receiving back. Not having LW hurt Sanchez and took out play options and put more attention on the receivers. Screen plays, dump offs and check downs keep drives alive, reduce ints and improves confidence and rhythm. The guy has a chip on his shoulder, is saying the right things and according to reports working out like a beast. He has a different skill set from SG which makes him a good change of pace to SG.
Everything sets up for him to be successful. I Think we will be happy with the pickup.

by george JETson on May 9, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you make a really good point

I am happy with the pick up, I’m just not sure he will be happy with the pick-up.

But, in the other hand I really don’t want a dump off offense for Sanchez. I want him thinking down field.

Let me ask you – and very few people seem to answer this kind of question when I ask it – HOW many receptions would you want LT having a game? I mean, if Sanchez is throwing maybe 25 balls at most, do you really want 4 of those going to LT?

Hopefully the need for the checkoff will be reduced with the addition of playmaking Holmes, the movement with of Coch to slot. I’m really hoping that LT will be in there on first and second down.

by kv on May 9, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

ah, I see

you answer me below, (nice anticipation), 2.5 receptions. This I’m not sure about this number but I’d live with it. I just want it on longer 3rd downs and special early packages.

Its funny, we are all excited by the idea of LT catching a swing pass right now, but in season when we see the nickel back closing in on him behind the line of scrimage we are going to be rolling our eyes. LT was a dynamic pass catching runner because he was an unbelievable runner. The linebacker on him simply could not cover over. He’s likely not that sort of dude now.

I will have to say that there is one BIG exception to my argument, older players (probably due to human growth hormone and other exotics) are have incredible physical and atheletic resurgences. Look at Grant Hill with the Suns. If ever there was a washed up older player it was him. And a ton in baseball. There really is the chance that LT may find the fountain of youth – literally.

by kv on May 9, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

if he proves he can start?

if he earns the starting job even though green is running like he ran in the playoffs, then start him. He got to earn it though. His past means nothing, what you do now counts!!!

by BIG OH!!!!! on May 8, 2010 5:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Hes on a different team now...

If he thinks he can start it’s because he’s ready to try and take the starting spot. I don’t think he would be so arrogant to think he could walk on to a team and just take the starting spot based on rep. I like his frame of mind. He can try all he wants. It’s the perfect storm. A 2nd year beast has to fend off an aging HOF who’s going to be nipping at his heels for carries all season. Im fine with that. He’d better keep his mouth shut tho. If all goes well we’ll see who’s still standing in the AFCC game. lol

by colinyoung on May 8, 2010 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Is there any real proof that he B!#ches if he doesnt get the ball besides he looked sad on the sideline. Is there a quote somewhere, a teammate that got traded, a hint of lockeroom disruption? Oh wait, that was TJ in Chicago. Guy says the right thing and we think he’s starting a prima donna act. He wants to prove it on the field! I like Colinyoung’s take on it. The push should make them both better.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 7:51 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think he bitches, outright

He’s a stoic leader. Bitching isn’t the only problem. Clearly he holds the Charger’s offense and Turner as responsible for his decline from greatness, and expects to become a dominant player of some kind here. He probably was told he was going to get every chance (and will be in a 50/50 sit to start). It just seems doubtful that he going to see the light when Rex recognizes the young potential in Greene, for the second year in a row. He won’t disrupt the whole team, but it won’t sit well with him. I think we can gauge that.

by kv on May 8, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lets assume SG is the sarter...

if LT gets 14 carries and 2.5 catches and we win, he will get favorite press and love from the press then he’ll be fine. If we are losing and he and SG have the same #‘s maybe he sulks. It wasn’t so much he B****ed in SD as he felt scapegoated as everyone said he’d lost it. Right or wrong his numbers caused the talk because they were below expectations. If he had slightly better numbers in SD it would still have been a disappointment, while if has a 4.2ypg avg and 225 rushes and 12 td it will be a successful year and he will be praised.

by george JETson on May 8, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really don't think he is going to ave. 14 for the year

carries a game. Its going to be under 9 or 8 by the end of the year.

by kv on May 9, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

When ppl assume hes a bitcher they are thinking of very specific instances.

LT on the field after that Pats game a few years ago. I think he was complaining after the Pats ran up the score. He was also the unoffical spokes person for the Chargers and was the first person in the post-game interviews after big losses. Usually putting someone or something on blast. Usually the refs were the subject of attention. But nothing serious to worry about. Im hoping he stays away from the media after games to be honest. But he’s just too popular a player to think he’s going to be a non-factor with the media. So Im hoping he curbs himself a lil.

by colinyoung on May 8, 2010 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

cy: “Im hoping he stays away from the media after games to be honest. But he’s just too popular a player to think he’s going to be a non-factor with the media.”

I wasn’t really thinking about his role in the media. Really good point. He is used to being the face of a franchise. When you think about the guys who MIGHT be quote monsters, there are not that many folks other than Rex you would anticipate reporters turning to. People are going to want to know what LT thinks, one way or another.

by kv on May 8, 2010 10:13 PM EDT reply actions  

I dont think he can be starting RB anymore

Like I’ve said if you use him like the way we use Ricky Williams then he should play well.

2009 NY Phin PhansFantasy League Champion
2009 Best Regular Season Record in NYPPL.
2010 The Jim Mandich NewsFlash Award Winner.

by Patssuck456 on May 9, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New York Jets.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rackmultipart
GGN Thread About Nothing #18 Enter Sandman
545595_428600250485671_100000070982458_1739202_129649609_n_1_small
5 players that i expect to see improvement from this year
P3733056reg_small
Why will Aaron Maybin get 10-20 sacks this season.
Small
Do You Trust The Jets' Front Office?
Small
Diggin Dunbar Diggin the 46

Recent FanPosts

Small
Conner can run
Small
Thoughts on the upcoming season part 1: What to watch for
Small
Thoughts On the Upcoming Season Part 2: The season
Small
Thoughts On the Upcoming Season Part 3: Cleaning House
Small
The Peyton-Goes-Down Debacle Prequel, and the Best QB Some of You Never Heard Of.
Bp_unmasked_small
I say get Kellen Winslow

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Gangreen-large_small John B

Great-british-events-flag_small David_Wyatt

Staff Writers

Revis_island_small Bro Namath

943_small dvdvil

Wayne_chrebet1_small GangGreenMag

Haters_small bobdolethesnapplelady

Santana_moss_small Jeff W.

Moderators

Revis_christ_small Judgegavel

Return_of_the_jet-i_small MachlinT

Jimmy2_small Tamarack

Rackmultipart rexthejet