The Case for Dwight Lowery at Safety
If the Jets look to replace Kerry Rhodes internally, a lot of money will go on Eric Smith being the guy. I could see them going a bit outside the box and turning to Dwight Lowery to play free safety, though. I think he's got the tools to make a good one.
The knock on Lowery as a corner is that he isn't fast. Our own David Wyatt argues he doesn't have the range to play safety. Everybody here should know by now how much I respect David's opinion, but I'm not sure I agree in this case. Speed at safety is different from speed at corner. Lowery's biggest problem is a lack of fluidity when turning his hips in man coverage. He has pretty good lateral speed, which comes into play more as a safety. When he was drafted, the book on him was he was more skilled playing zone coverage, which would make him a good replacement for Rhodes since Kerry was asked to play a lot of Cover 1 deep. He's also better diagnosing plays in front of him than he is playing somebody in physical fashion right at the line.
The other thing working in his favor is his experience at the position. He wouldn't be a total blank slate and have to learn the nuances of the position from scratch. He played quite a bit of safety in college and was a real ballhawk. Starting 15 games at safety, he had 13 interceptions. I know the competition wasn't that great, but that's still pretty impressive.
He is only 5'11" and 198 pounds. Paired with Jim Leonhard, the Jets would probably have the smallest safety duo in the league. As we know, though, Leonhard plays much bigger than his frame. Lowery won't remind anybody of John Lynch, but he is a sound tackler and would probably be an upgrade over Kerry Rhodes against the run.
The more I think about it, the more I like the idea. Dwight could play a hybrid role like Antrel Rolle did with the Cardinals, lining up at safety and sliding to the nickel in passing downs. I'm not sure this would be my first choice, but I do think it could work pretty well. He could be a playmaker in centerfield.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
Not the best option, but if thats the route we have to go I’m less worried about it now. What you said about his coverage skills makes a lot of sense. And I didnt know he played some Safety in college, which is encouraging.
Some Draft pundits thought he was a better prospect at safety than corner when he came out.
Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com
I remember hearing that too.
He doesn’t have the greatest speed or quickness, but he seems to be a solid tackler with good ball skills and good instincts.
"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS
I like this idea
but instead of Taylor Mays how about Myron Rolle when is he expected to come of the boards?
Bonds... hit is high.... He hits it DEEEEEEEP..... OUTTA HERE BONDS STANDS ALONE- Duane Kuiper on 756
I think he will be a better safety than he would a corner, but still not sold on that lateral quickness. Just personally think it would be a substantial step down from Kerry Rhodes, but it wouldn’t be a disaster. I would rather have Dwight start there than spend a first round pick on a safety.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
Ihedibo is a fierce tackler with similar lateral speed and smoother hips than Lowery and I’m a big Lowery fan. I’d rather see him in ‘nickel’ coverage than starting in the Safety spot, especially now with Cromartie and Revis as the CBs.
After Berry and Earl Thomas, there’s a drop-off for Safeties. And, right now, Jets have 1, 2, 4… with a RB somewhere after #1. If the Jets see the need as serious and they can get Thomas, I wouldn’t be surprised and I’d be pleased. I’d be more pleased if they pick up Tate at 29.
by GPB on Mar 7, 2010 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
I think Lowery is a solid tackler for a defensive back.
He had 55 tackles from corner as a rookie and 5 forced fumbles. The tackling isn’t what would worry me.
"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS
Maybe it just seemed like he was missing a lot of tackles to me
not a bad paper stat though.
Very Interesting Concept
Something I have not seen discussed anywhere else. Good stuff, John.
I disagree only because of his size. I think we need a big guy to compliment Leonhard. If we were to go up against some of these same TE’s we faced at the end of last season again (Gates, Gonzalez, Clark), we would have some serious matchup issues. Too big of a size mismatch.
Obviously Eric Smith will be rotated in also, but he cannot mark that caliber of TE’s.
GGN Staff Writer
www.ganggreennation.com

by 
















