Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

David Clowney: Stay or Go?

David Clowney has been a star of the last two preseasons. He put up 15 catches for 465 yards and 5 touchdowns in 6 games. He was such a dynamic vertical threat that his play actually had some people believing Brett Ratliff could be a successful quarterback in the NFL. It looked like the Jets may have something in the young waiver wire pickup from Green Bay. Things never really panned out.

Clowney was injured and inactive for most of 2008. He did look good in limited opportunities. 2009 was supposed to be his big chance. There was a fresh start with a new coach. There was a wide open competition of unheralded guys to start along with Jerricho Cotchery. Another monster preseason raised hopes. Clowney was largely invisible. His most notable moment was arguably a suspension for complaining about his lack of playing time on Twitter. He had a couple of good games against Miami and Oakland during the first half of the year but very little else. David looked more and more like a guy who could run really fast on vertical routes but not a ton else. He hasn't looked very refined as a route runner.

David Clowney's one of my favorite people on the team. He keeps a blog to stay close to his fans. He took in his brother and is raising him. I just don't see where he fits on this team.  He didn't really show he's capable of starting on the outside or working in the slot. If he's going to be near the back of the depth chart, he really needs to contribute on special teams like Brad Smith and Wallace Wright. He hasn't really done much on that end. The Jets also have a talented guy, Aundrae Allison, coming back capable of playing the burner role in multi receiver sets.

I regrettably vote go.

How do you vote? 

Poll
Should the Jets keep David Clowney?
Yes
113 votes
No
153 votes

266 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

People seem to like David, and sure he might be a nice guy, but does he contribute anything really? I think your right John, when sitting at the bottom of the depth chart you have to be a special teamer and I haven’t really seen that. Allison looked real promising and his route running looks better than Clowney.Just no room, he is Mr August, but we got him from a practise squad for a reason, he is a burner who will show up once or twice a season. I think Allison can do the same job but probably better. I like the Clown, but I don’t think he has a future here with the Jets.

I vote go

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

I vote stay.
Stay.
Stay.
Stay.

It might be because I met him when I was in middle school. Even though he does well in the preseason, it’s building up to perform better in the regular season. Allison coming off an injury isn’t a sure spot on the depth chart. Do you release a player who you know will probably win out the battle between the two in the preseason because one of them is surely known for his preseason performance. I don’t know. I’d like the Clown to remain a Jet, I think he can develop and it’s not like he is costing us a lot of money. I don’t see a need to argue about this. Is his contract over? If it is not, why open up a hole and try and go for a wide receiver second, this guy is a vertical threat always needed to be accounted for.

Rex Ryan – “Who can cover the Clown?”

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 1:56 PM EST reply actions  

Just like Gholston. A threat to produce and production are not the same thing. Clowney has been given ample opportunity to produce and hasn’t. Time to cut our losses.

by Crackback on Feb 27, 2010 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

I vote stay.
I really like him and he has great speed and decent hands. This year they never really gave any receivers except Jerricho and Braylon more than a few snaps a game due to the whole ground and pound offense. Personally i think he can be a deep threat in the nfl if he was put in the #2 receiver spot. Maby we move J-Co to slot, (great hands, crisp route running, not afraid of contact, and good at getting YAC) keep Braylon at #1, and Clowney at 2. With that, the team would have 2 deep threats downfield and proven receiver in the slot.

by flixenuz on Feb 27, 2010 2:06 PM EST reply actions  

Clowney had zero catches in the 3 games before the arrival of Edwards. Stuckey beat him out. If Clowney can’t beat out Stuckey, how can he really be a #2 receiver?

by Crackback on Feb 27, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Oops. Make that 4 games before the arrival of Edwards.

by Crackback on Feb 27, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Only problem I have is, I don’t think I have ever seen him catch a difficult ball that wasn’t on a post or flag route.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

His arsenal is limited, but do you think Wallace Wright or Henry has more impact in the wide receiver position?

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Wallace Wright has more impact for the team, his ST ability is extremely valuable.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I haven't seen any reason to believe that Clowney isn't garbage.

Even during his preseason success stories the last couple of years I never cared for him. Meh. I can’t get that awful route in the playoffs out of my head.

"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS

by nrmax88 on Feb 27, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

+1. And that’s the only memory i have of him.

by random122 on Feb 27, 2010 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

And Shonn Greene had 31 yards and a fumble problem before leon washington went down but now he is probably the best back on the roster. All it takes is a starting role and a player can really shine.

by flixenuz on Feb 27, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Shonn Greene was a rookie and made plays despite his fumble issues early on. Many of us were clamoring to see more touches for Greene during the season. Who clamored to see Clowney?

by Crackback on Feb 27, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

As of then, no one but right now everyone wants a great slot receiver and i think we move Cotchery to slot because he has alot of attributes you want in a slot receiver. Then take Clowney and use him to stretch the field to open up the run game and the screen pass. This way we don’t need to waste a pick on a receiver and can use them on a man corner and some kind of a pass rusher.

by flixenuz on Feb 27, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

He could barely make it as a #3 receiver, what makes you think he could make it as a #2. That would be a terrible move IMO, Clwoney’s blocking is also well below par, having him trying to seal the edge is like trying to get Gholston to get in the QB’s face, he had the opportunity to be the #2 this year and got beat out by Stuckey, even after he had a good pre-season, mainly because the coaching staff probably saw that while it’s nice to have a burner, to me a legitimate receiving threat, you need to be able to run all kinds of different routes. He was on the GB practise squad for a reason, and there is a reason why he didn’t get much playing time this year, his repertoire is limited to the point that when putting him on the field, teams know that the only thing they have to worry about is him beating them deep.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

The Greene analogy doesn’t work. The reason he did nothing early was he was sitting behind Jones and Washington on the depth chart. He delivered when he got his chance.

Clowney had wide open competitions for the slot and starting receiver spots and didn’t take advantage.

Editor-In-Chief
Gang Green Nation
SB Nation's Jets Blog
http://www.ganggreennation.com

by John B on Feb 27, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Another argument.

The Jets do not pass the ball often enough to pick up 100 reception stars and 1000 yard receivers. However, the Jets do need receivers who can take it the distance, the reason to keep the CLOWN!

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 2:55 PM EST reply actions  

Clowney can’t take it the distance, he can run fast in a straight line and beat out 3rd or 4th stringers, even that Oakland TD, the first stringers were right with him, you can find a lot of players in this league who have speed and can run in a straight line. There is no reason to keep Clowney on this team apart from sentimental attachment because he is good at interacting with fans.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

haha, I think other people deserve a chance true. But, is his contract over?

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Why is it a regrettable vote no? Clowney is useless unless its August.

by jets47 on Feb 27, 2010 3:12 PM EST reply actions  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02FX_o3yu2k

Sanchez passes in Oakland game, let’s see Clowney.

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 3:53 PM EST reply actions  

:08 to :28
1:48 to 2:12
4:22 to 5:02

For the limited times, the Jets pass in any game, to have an impact like this is what the Jets need to keep.
He’s not due millions of dollars. Keep him!

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

6:15 to 6:50 also..

I thought I was done with 3. He wasn’t. He was done with 4.

He started this game in place of J-Co.

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Decent production against a horrific team, hardly evidence to suggest he can be a #2…..

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction

Solid production and outstanding job filling in for Cotch. Against a defense ranked #7 in the league vs. the pass. Great vid BTW. Keep the Clown? Of freakin’ course.

by nationalist88 on Feb 27, 2010 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, against a defense ranked number 7 against the pass

because they get ass fucked against the run, and because they have Nnamdi Asomugha. It doesn’t mean you can’t throw at them at all.

Catch 1. Catches 2 yard pass, runs for about 10 more. Fumbles the ball for no reason.

Catch 2. Wasn’t covered, ran 10 yards into a gaping hole in the zone, caught the ball.

Catch 3. Nice play, but we’ve seen it. David mentioned it. All he can do is run straight. Chris Johnson also never turned around and saw the ball. Again, nice catch, but we knew he had straight line speed.

Catch 4. Again, nice play, but nobody covered him. Sanchez made a quick 4 yard pass and Clowney ran with the ball.

I don’t hate Clowney, but he definitely has done nothing to prove he is starter material, and one game against one of the worst teams in the NFL isn’t going to change many opinions. Also, while I’m sure the Jets will always like to run the ball, the game calling will become more balanced as Sanchez improves.

"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS

by nrmax88 on Feb 27, 2010 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

keep him around as a big weapon in the preseason passing game.

by Ozone on Feb 27, 2010 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

Watch the video above and those 4 times.

To start in this game, and have this impact in a run heavy offense is what the Jets want.

We need him to perform more consistently though.

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry to say Max, but any wide receiver in the NFL probably makes those catches, and probably should make those catches as well. He is a nice compliment every now and again, but not worth keeping over a receiver who can do exactly what he does, as well as block in the run game and work on special teams, it makes no sense.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I know what you mean.
He needs to be more consistent.

Another year at least.
He’s not too expensive.

After all , he can help bring out the best in Aundrae Allison this training camp and preseason.

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

We might as well keep him in camp, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see him the odd man out when it came to cutting the roster down at the final mark. I can’t wait to see Allison back up and training again. Got a good feeling about that guy.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know.
Heard he doesn’t follow routes…any knowledge of this?

I think an 88 and out the gate vs. Who can cover the Clown matchup seems like so much fun!

-Boy…. I miss watching football so much!-

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Never heard that criticism of him to be honest, the only real criticism I have heard is his work ethic leaves a lot to be desired.

Will have to wait and see.

Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com

by David_Wyatt on Feb 27, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes…

-Boy….I miss watching football so much!-

-Check out the Debates-

by Max Strauss on Feb 27, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

It's disappointing

considering the flashes of talent he showed in preseason and training camp but he just hasn’t measured up.

Time to go.

by Bro Namath on Feb 27, 2010 4:06 PM EST reply actions  

This is really going out on a tangent here, but...

Here’s a crazy thought: instead of wasting time trying to put polish on a turd we drafted #6 overall that is absolutely worthless, how about spending some time developing a guy who has actually shown flashes that he can be an impact player? Does that just make too much sense?

Clowney = maybe

Gholston = never

any questions?

by nationalist88 on Feb 27, 2010 5:15 PM EST reply actions  

Yes, I have a question.

When did you ever something that made you think he can be an impact player? Pre-season doesn’t count.

"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS

by nrmax88 on Feb 27, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the New York Jets.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
New Weekly FanPost Idea:
058_sione_pouha--300x300_small
Weekly Caption Contest (no, this has nothing to do with fanshots) Week #1
Revis_island_small
Bro Namath Needs Your Help (Unrec please)
Small
The Natural
058_sione_pouha--300x300_small
What is a Fanshot, and why you should care (Plus MS Paint). (unrec the sucker because we need to shorten the reccomended posts)

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editors

Gangreen-large_small John B

Great-british-events-flag_small David_Wyatt

Staff Writers

Revis_island_small Bro Namath

943_small dvdvil

Wayne_chrebet1_small GangGreenMag

Haters_small bobdolethesnapplelady

Santana_moss_small Jeff W.

Moderators

Revis_christ_small Judgegavel

Return_of_the_jet-i_small MachlinT

Jets_small Tamarack

058_sione_pouha--300x300_small rexthejet