Why Darrelle Revis Should Have Won Defensive Player of the Year
I normally don't care all that much about awards. In most cases they are debatable with many deserving candidates. This was not one of those cases. There is no room for debate. Darrelle Revis was a better player than Charles Woodson this season. It's a fact. He should have won the award.
More after the jump.
Whenever I thought of reasons Revis deserved this award, I go back to an article ESPN.com ran a little over a month ago. It had a very interesting piece of analysis.
In the first season under head coach Rex Ryan, the Jets currently rank second in the NFL in total defense. One of the core tenets of their scheme this season has Revis shadowing the opposing team's best wide receiver all over the field in man-to-man coverage, in what's become known as Revis Island. That may seem obvious, but for all the hype about "shutdown cornerbacks," the majority of teams don't deploy their best corner the way the Jets do. Most keep their corners on a preferred side of the field or otherwise adapt to their existing scheme. In recent matchups against the New England Patriots and Carolina Panthers, not only has Revis switched sides of the field to match up with Randy Moss and Steve Smith, he's even lined up in the slot just to stick with them.
It's this nugget that makes me chuckle when people argue Woodson lining up all over the field is some sort of point for him over Revis. Darrelle's degree of difficulty was much more difficult, constantly going up against the top receiving threat on the other team. The Packers spent time deploying their best cover guy at linebacker and safety. The Jets had their top cover guy following the top opposing receiver all over the field. Which is the more valuable use? Which is more difficult?
Another argument I've heard for Woodson's "versatility" is he had to cover tight ends. That's just silly. Tight ends are easier to cover than receivers with the exception of Antonio Gates. That's why teams deploy linebackers and safeties on them in coverage. Aside from the Chargers, no team (even the Cowboys or the Falcons) can claim its most dangerous receiver is a tight end. They aren't as fast or athletic as wide receivers. Woodson's job was a lot easier when he had to cover tight ends.
Let's take a look at another claim, that Woodson's blitzing adds to his impact and shows he can do more than Revis. Nonsense. While it is true Revis did not blitz once all season, the reason was not an inability to be successful. It was because Darrelle's coverage was too valuable to lose by having him go after the quarterback. For what it's worth, though, let's see how much of an impact Woodson had as a blitzer. He rushed the passer 49 times. He had 2 sacks, 2 quarterback hits, and 6 pressures. That means he impacted well under 1 play per game rushing the passer. This blitzing means he wasn't in coverage 3 times per game. Kind of debunks those who say this "versatility" makes him more valuable, no?
Because Revis was always on the most dangerous weapon of an opposing offense, he was targeted more than Woodson. Quarterbacks tried to force the ball to their best player. They completed around 35% of the time going against Revis. They completed around 50% against Woodson. That's a stark difference. Revis allowed 3.5 yards after the catch. Woodson allowed 4.4.
How about those great Woodson ball skills? He had more intereceptions so that must mean he was better playing the ball. That's at least what sports writers would tell you. The numbers tell a different story. Woodson broke up just over 10% of the balls thrown at him. Revis just about doubles that figure. But hey, Randy Moss and a bunch of Packers fans I saw said Revis' coverage wasn't that great, and help he had over the top saved him.
What do Andre Johnson, Mike Sims-Walker, Steve Smith, Roddy White, Chad Johnson, Terrell Owens (twice), and Randy Moss (twice) have in common? Three things. They're all among the best receivers of the game. They all had Darrelle Revis chase them around for an entire game. None ended with over 40 yards.
There are of course some things that don't show up in numbers. One is the way Revis helped everybody else in the pass defense. His ability to play the other team's best receiver on an island allowed the Jets to roll their coverage to secondary targets. Remember how bad the Jets were at covering the tight end last year? I know adding Bart Scott and Jim Leonhard helped, but the flexibility Revis allowed the defense played a big hand. That's why the Jets had an elite pass defense.
Consider also the way Revis helped the blitz. The Jets are known for their effective pass rush. Do they have a guy like Terrell Suggs, though? There is no elite pass rusher on the roster. Given the caliber of players Revis was covering, all it took was one time for a blitz to be picked up and somebody to burn him for him to surrender a big play. The only guy who did that all year was Ted Ginn. Johnson didn't do it. Moss didn't do it. Smith didn't do it. Revis gave the blitzers extra time to get to a quarterback with his almost superhuman cover skills.
Yes, Woodson did more as a blitzer. Yes, he was very good against the run. This award isn't for the defender who does the most different things, though. It's for the best. Let's say Woodson's cover skills were worth 7 to his team, his blitzing was worth 1, and his run support was worth 4. Let's say all Darrelle did was cover but his value was 15. Revis is more valuable. Again, that's hypothetical. The values I used were random. I'm just trying to show more isn't better.
Today dvdil called this vote a travesty. David Wyatt called Darrelle the real defensive player of the year. SBNation.com called Woodson a deserving winner. My fellow bloggers agreed. David Wyatt and dvdvil are right. SBNation.com and its bloggers are wrong. So are the writers who made such a terrible vote today. They bought into the hype. Put Darrelle Revis on Green Bay's defense, and they don't get any worse. His job is easier. Put Woodson on New York's defense, and the Jets suffer.
3 recs |
90 comments
|
Comments
EPIC SNUB
Obviously numbers mean everything, since Woodson had more INT’s.
He also got WORKED by fitz on saturday, and the quality of WR he has been up against has been sh*t compared to what Revis has shutdown.
These idiot writers should get a clue and realize WHY teams WONT EVEN THROW on Revis, and the flexibility he brings to a defense.
GGN Staff Writer
www.ganggreennation.com
Great job...
by the Green Bay D Sunday night. Way to make an impact Charles!! You really make your team’s defense better. Without you playing your team would have lost. Oh, wait…
lol Fitz outmuscled him left and right and the Packer faithfuls were screaming for flags
Ocho was all over Revis left and right, and Revis stood his ground like a MAN w/ no complaints, he can play physical unlike woodson
GGN Staff Writer
www.ganggreennation.com
Don't blame Woodson because you don't like the writers choice.
It isn’t his fault. He is one sick defensive back, you guys sound like spoiled babies, trashing Woodson because your boy didn’t win.
WHO DEY, WHO DEY, WHO DEY THINK GON' BEAT THEM BENGALS.... J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS.
Pointing out deficiencies in someone’s game in comparison to the person who should of won is not being ‘spoiled babies’ it’s making a valid argument based on more than just basic stats. Nobody is saying that Woodson is a bad player, but everyone is saying that Revis is better.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
I agree.
However, a whole fanbase of people talking about how Woodson got owned and how he is Fitzgeralds bitch and Woodson isn’t a man is hardly pointing out deficiencies. It is acting like a bitch over a meaningless award voted on by douchebags who don’t know what the fuck they are talking about anyway.
"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS
The worst part about it is
On this very day… in 1969…. is when the Jets won Super Bowl III with Joe Willie
GGN Staff Writer
www.ganggreennation.com
No point in getting upset...
Sports writers aren’t exactly the cream of the journalistic crop. It should come as no surprise when their votes (or words for that matter) show them to be be lazy and shallow in their perceptions. What I hope for as Jets fan, as a fan of Darelle Revis is that this post season joy ride lasts a little longer. Let the celebrity field of Woodsons and Ray-Rays, Peytons and Favres thin out and have the national spotlight shine on what is turning out to be a pretty special player. If this Jets are able to knock off the Bolts and if they make noise in the AFC championship game, it’ll be thanks in part to his play.
It does shock me when Tim Graham, a guy who spends most of his time at 1 Orchard Dr, but supposedly cover the Jets as well as the rest of the AFC East, makes the case for Woodson as some linebacker/corner-back hybrid superman (as a side note, James Harrison only had one INT last year, what an incredibly one-dimensional and undeserving DPOY!). He didn’t have a vote, but if a guy who was supposed to watch and chronicle Revis all season can’t see past some pretty superficial stats, then what can you expect from the national media.
HEy Woodson won the regular season DPOY title
but the Packers out already; and the Jets are STILL IN! (do you remeber when P. Manning was awarded the MVP title then in the next day he did a 1 nd done in the playoffs? Playodff matters. Reevis made a fool (twice) from Chad 85; Now he can do the same with Vincent jackson…
And by the way what if Reevis win the Superbowl MVP ttitle instead; huh?
Life without knowledge is death in disguise
by Zoltan from Budapest on Jan 12, 2010 8:26 PM EST reply actions
This from an espn article says it all
Revis: 40 receptions on 108 targets (37.0 percent) for 439 yards and two touchdowns.
Woodson: 40 receptions on 84 targets (47.6 percent) for 560 yards and six touchdowns.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 12, 2010 8:27 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Just as a side note
Lowery was at 40.7% and Sheppard at 45.6 %, minimum 50 targets.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
Look at the bright side
this can be another motivational tool for Rex…if they can somehow run the table I could care less about the award. I suspect Revis feels the same way.
"I've been trying transcendental meditation, and that helps me be passive and wait on the curve. I've got to find something else to hit the slider." - George (The Stork) Theodore
if they run the table...
how about super bowl mvp?
and the home of the... JETS!!!
www.ganggreennation.com
This was a completely ridiculous vote!!! Revis deserved it!!!!!!
by atlantic division on Jan 12, 2010 9:14 PM EST reply actions
revis will never come closer to the dpoy award ever again
haha i feel sorry for u revis fans thats wat u get haha revis sucks woodson all the way haha
How does it feel being home for the playoffs?
Your moron.
Almost 500 offensive yards and you couldnt even win the game? HAHA. You say Dom Capers 3-4 this, Dom Capers 3-4 that, and you gave up 50 points!!!
I hope your boy Charles is recovering from all the bruises and beating Fitz gave him.
GGN Staff Writer
www.ganggreennation.com
Note to Matt: use spell check before calling someone a moron.
For every woman masturbating right now, there is a guy masturbating while imagining that woman masturbate.
2009 NY Phin PhansFantasy League Champion
2009 Best Regular Season Record in NYPPL.
You are a colossal moron, you have just proven to all of us what an idiot you are.
Thomas Jones runs this league
stats....
I guess it’s official, DPOY means “best” statistics and not most valuable. On the bottom line it said “Woodson wins DPOY, tied in lead with 9 int’s”. Really???? he won because he had 9 int’s, I guess Sharper should of won as well.
Again this is why I think MVP awards are ridicoulous, well at least the people who vote for them are
Why NFL? WHY?
First they leave my current favorite player off the pro bowl roster (Steve Smith NYG) and now Revis, my second favorite player, gets snubbed! HE SO DESERVED IT YA BASTERDS!
"Son, Nobody is half as good as Mickey Mantle"
wow, a unanimous vote shows tht he shudve won
by schmosterballs92 on Jan 12, 2010 9:34 PM EST reply actions
We are a great democracy :-D
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
Revis and fantasy
I agree that Revis was deserving of the defensive MVP award this season.
If I were to play devil’s advocate, I would have to say many fans (myself included) are more aware of Revis’ accomplishments because of how they impacted the fantasy game.
Woodson had an excellent season as well. They both deserve accolades.
You guys should feel very proud that you have Darrelle.
Based upon what little I’ve read, I believe that the wideouts Revis covered totaled less than 1000 yards, in fact, probably more like 850 or so.
Considering that the NFL has had 10 4000-yard passing QBs and 11 1000-yard wideouts, that is no small potatoes.
By the way, is it just me, or is his jersey number both a multiple of Joe Namath’s and a mirror image of Ronnie Lott’s?
Way, way, way less than a 1,000 yards, he gave up 426 yards into his coverage
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
by David_Wyatt on Jan 12, 2010 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
Whoa...is that even...real??
That would be like Drew Brees throwing for, like, 11,000 yards and 90 touchdowns or something.
Only stat that matters
Points. Games are won on points. Woodson is the leader of GB’s pass defense. Revis is the leader of the Jets pass defense. GB’s D gave up 29 passing TD’s. Jets gave up 8 passing TD’s. There is no way the leader of the passing D should win DPOY when they give up 29 TD’s through the air, over a guy who leads the passing D on a team that gave up 8.
By the way… The Jets offense and Special Teams gave up 7 TD’s, so if your an OC going into a game against the jets, you have an equal chance of scoring without your offense on the field as you do throwing the ball.
you guys are on something
I love the Jets, always have and always will…
But to say that Woodson didn’t deserve player of the year, you are obviously on something. Woodson WAS MOST DEFINTELY the Most Valuable Player. He was everywhere! He is versatile! The only way Larry Fitz did anything on him was by Offensive Pass Interference, did you guys not watch that game? When you have a corner like C. Wood, QB’s just don’t throw towards him, why…because he is going to strip the ball or cut the route and intercept it.
Was Revis deserving of some recognition, of course, he had a great season!
But let’s not kid ourselves just because we are Jets fans.
Kurt Warner didn't get your memo
“When you have a corner like C. Wood, QB’s just don’t throw towards him,” You should watch the game tape from Sunday night. Notice who is “covering” the guy Warner throws to when they need a few yards to get into field goal position. (He also tried to strip the ball rather than make the tackle, and the receiver picked up another 10 yards).
No football fan, let alone a Jets fan can come to that stupid conclusion, when you have a corner like Woodson they are not throwing towards him lol, priceless when considering they complete 50% of their passes into his coverage, he has given up 3x as many TD’s as Revis, and over 100 yards more. If that is your conclusion sir, you don’t know football, and you certainly are not a Jets fan, at best it is 65-35 in favour of Revis deserving it, maybe the neutral fan can push it to 60-40, but him winning it, I think you are smoking something fella.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
by David_Wyatt on Jan 12, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions
I will agree with you that he was everywhere though, unfortunately he was everywhere getting humped up and down the field by Larry.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
by David_Wyatt on Jan 12, 2010 11:13 PM EST up reply actions
hey packers fan masquerading as Jets fan
stop your embarrassing antics, you obviously have no life if you signed up at this forum just to pretend to be a Jets fan and post trash.
by secret defense on Jan 12, 2010 11:01 PM EST reply actions
Yer not a chance he is a Jets fan.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
by David_Wyatt on Jan 12, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions
By the way, John B...
…I know you list Antonio Gates as the Chargers’ most dangerous receiving threat, but what about Vincent Jackson?
He helps stretch the field for Philip Rivers and isn’t exactly pint-sized. And there are those who make a case that he should have made the Pro Bowl.
Just a thought, there.
Revis shuts down receivers but
he’s also great at run support. He can hold his own and tackle running backs.
and the home of the... JETS!!!
www.ganggreennation.com
His stats were against bums
Woodson got most of his stats against Tampa (Twice) Chicago (twice), St. Louis, Detroit (twice), Cleveland & Arizona without Warner. He got two interceptions against Detroit, Two against Cincinnati, one against Chicago, Dallas, Cleveland, and Arizona (not Warner). He only got one against an elite quaterback if you want to call Romo one.
Packers schedule was soft...
but yes, Tony Romo is definitely elite.
by My Pet Goat on Jan 13, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions
But he's nowhere near as good as
Brady, Manning, Schaub and Brees.
Here we go
20 more tackles, 4 forced fumbles to Revis’ none, 2 sacks to Revis’ none, 9 interceptions to Revis’ 6.
Shutdown corners don’t win yearly awards. They have relatively nothing to show for stats.
Precisely why you don’t judge a players worth based purely on stats
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
by David_Wyatt on Jan 12, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Right.
Hence the term “Revis Island.” The receiver is marooned there. No football, no nothing.
Forced fumbles – you can’t force a fumble when the ball isn’t caught.
Sacks – Revis is the only Jets DB who hasn’t been sent to blitz.
Meanwhile, every other DB in the squad has been freed up to rush the quarterback.
Interceptions – pretty tough to intercept balls when they’re on the opposite sideline.
and the home of the... JETS!!!
www.ganggreennation.com
Here we go
R moss(2x), T O(2x), Ochocinco(2x), A Johnson, S Smith(Car), M Colston, T Holt, R Wayne, R White
AVERAGE YPG 19.5 AVERAGE REC PER GAME 2.75, TOTAL TDS 1
Darrelle Revis PRICELESS!!
I get your guys tired talking points, I’m just saying it’s not going to fly with anyone who isn’t a jets fan.
I think that’s actually not true, I have talked to several non Jets fans, even some Giants fans who said that this was a snub. It’s not so much that you can’t sell it to a non Jets fan, it’s just you can’t sell it to a Green Bay fan.
Writer/Assistant editor
Eternal optimist
New York Jets
Gang Green Nation
www.ganggreennation.com
Green Bay fans
weren’t the ones voting on this award. And it shouldn’t be a shock when your Giants friends who are immersed in the NY media have an appreciation for RelleRev.
by My Pet Goat on Jan 13, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
MORE TIRED TALKING POINTS
Some have tried to justify Woodson by saying look at the impact he has on making GB the #2 D. Very well, lets look at the impact they have by comparing the 2 Ds in some areas where Revis and Woodson would have big impactS
NUMBER OF TIMES D GAVE UP 30+ PTS
GB: 6 (31,30,38,38,37,51)
JETS: 3 (31,30,31)
NUMBER OF TIMES D GAVE UP 100+ YRDS TO A REC.
GB: 5
JETS: 1
NUMBER OF TIMES D GAVE UP 250+ YRDS TO A QB
GB: 5
JETS: 1
HOW TEAMS DID AGAINST COMMON FOES
GB: L to BENGALS: D gave up 31; L to the BUCS: D gave up 38
JETS: Beat the BENGALS twice: D gave up 14: Beat the BUCS: D gave up 3
Revis’ shutdown play allows us to role coverage to the 2-3 options thus helping the entire secondary. It also allows us to blitz more thus disrupting the QB.
From China Tim: Revis is the Man!
From the Prophet of The Forbidden City: Denied once, Revis will come home with The Big Rock!
Hands down best write-up I've read anywhere all year.
Way to break it down John B.
I love the defenders of Woodson in their attempt to puff up his strip of Fitz last weekend. Conveniently failing to mention the TDs he relented in a game they lost in OT. If Revis plays that game Fitz has 3 catches for 36 yrds and no TDs. Packers pull off one of the greatest come-backs in post season history.
Since San Diego has so many good receivers
Wouldn’t it make sense to drop Revis into zone coverage for this game. It might even upend whatever the chargers were preparing for. just a thought.
And they should use Shonn Greene for reverses and slip screens...
There’s no way San Diego would be prepared for that. Maybe they should use Danny Woodhead at NT.
by My Pet Goat on Jan 13, 2010 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
While I agree with the general point, a minor quibble...
… “SBNation.com called Woodson a deserving winner.”
The SBNation.com article that you linked to actually says that while Woodson is probably deserving, Revis was more deserving and the better player. A quote: “Which is to say, on the strength of his regular season, Revis should have won. In this case, the perception from last week’s games was actually justified. No, this wasn’t a BBWA-level mistake, but Jets fans have good reason to feel that the better cornerback did not win today.”
great poll :)
"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"
Woodson can not handle big recevers
As we seen last week Woodson can not handle big recevers. I saw T.O. destroy him one year when he was with the Raiders. This award was about stats, not who was the best defensive player!!
Jesus....
You do all realize you’re arguing and getting pissed over the accomplishments of other grown men right?
Clever
But even had one of my team’s players had been snubbed which they weren’t, Charles Woodson was hands down the best defensive player of the year (Keep in mind, the award is not cover corner of the year) I still wouldn’t bitch and moan about it as if though I myself was somehow snubbed.
by Charlie Kelly on Jan 14, 2010 7:22 AM EST up reply actions
Ladies and gentlemen,
Revis has left the building.
I do wonder if its a consolation prize for him not getting CBPOTY.
For every woman masturbating right now, there is a guy masturbating while imagining that woman masturbate.
2009 NY Phin PhansFantasy League Champion
2009 Best Regular Season Record in NYPPL.
Just like you couldnt measure LT's impact on games by counting sacks, you measure Revis's impact by counting picks.
Anyone who actually watched LT played knows that he could completely dominate a game without registering a sack. He would consistently draw and often beat double-teams and still apply pressure over and entire game. He could dominate a game without showing up on the stat sheet.
Same with Revis. He’s repeatedly assigned the opponent’s best receiver and simply erases them. He might never register a pick, but he cripples the opposing team’s offense.
Whereas Woodson will get a flashy strip, but get manhandled for two TDs and his team loses in OT.
Revis is like a young Champ Bailey
Both are the definition of shutdown corner.
For every woman masturbating right now, there is a guy masturbating while imagining that woman masturbate.
2009 NY Phin PhansFantasy League Champion
2009 Best Regular Season Record in NYPPL.
by Patssuck456 on Jan 13, 2010 10:27 PM EST up reply actions
By the way....
…be happy that after “any given Sunday” the Jets are still running for the ultimate prize, while the Packers are watching them do it on TV.
AP Defensive Player of the Year Charles Woodson of the Green Bay Packers
The definition of the Defensive Player of the Year is not necessarily one who does the best in their specific position. Rather, it is who is the BEST defensive player, regardless of position. I will not take anything away from Revis being a PHENOMENAL shut-down corner. That being said, and by your own admission in this article, that’s ALL he did this year was shut down receivers – JUST AS A CORNER.
Charles Woodson, on the other hand, covered the ENTIRE field. Offenses never knew exactly where he was going to be, and because of that, he had high statistics in various defensive categories – unlike Revis who had high statistics in general CORNER categories.
Of course Woodson’s CORNER categorial stats can’t match up completely to Revis’, he was too busy blitzing, covering the middle, covering deep AND covering outside in different variations of plays. As a result, he had high marks in multiple categories that took a little away from his specific position. Revis played one-on-one, and did one hell of a job against top receivers, but one-on-one nonetheless.
Did you not ever see the Packers utilizing Dom Capers’ “Psycho” package – 1 defensive lineman and 9 linebackers? Yeah, Woodson became one of those blitzing linebackers on those plays. Did you not see any of the all-out blitzes the Pack ran? Oh yeah, Woodson became a safety in those situations. And did you happen to see when Green Bay ran man-coverage? Bingo, Woodson was a corner for that.
The bottom line is, you can’t compare position stats only, when determining qualifiers for this award, when a player raises the bar high enough to make the entire league re-think how to run their offense around such an un-orthodox defensive scheme. You also cannot take away the impact that Woodson’s specific tenured leadership brought to this #2 Defense (#1 Run), as this is also factored into the credentials.
At the end of the day, water covers 70% of the Earth, Charles Woodson cover’s the rest.
So i guess a guy that single-covers a WR most other defenses need to double...
so that the rest of the defense can double lesser receivers and blitz the QB has less of an impact than a guy who gets a meaningless strip in his team’s most important game while surrendering 2 TDs prior to losing in OT.
At the end of the day Larry Fitz had 8 catches for 60 yards and 2 TDs, while Charlie Woodson covered the turf.
How is a strip ever meaningless?
The Cardinals were driving into Packer territory looking to score again. Also, on one of Fitzgerald’s TD’s there was a blatant offensive pass interference call were Fitzgerald shoved Woodson to the ground.
by Charlie Kelly on Jan 14, 2010 7:29 AM EST up reply actions
Revis played one-on-one, and did one hell of a job against top receivers, but one-on-one nonetheless.
What NFL are you watching? Most teams double the #1 receivers that Revis shut down. Or they play zone coverge or send safety help over the top. One-on-one man coverage WITH the safety rolling away to help the other side is unheard of! You don’t understad the impact because you didn’t wtch a whole JETS game. But i directly made the JETS defense #1, and even the analyst and media agree on that! Rex Ryan has said he won’t send Revis on blitzes because his abilty to shut down the #1 guy is too valuable. We blitz more than anyone, plus Rex has sent everyone on his exotic blitzes except Revis. Based on what I saw last game, it didn’t matter whether Woodson was on Fitzgerald or not so you might as well have sent him blitzing or roaming cuz he got burned in coverage,HIS PRIMARY JOB AS CORNERBACK!
You're focusing on one weekend - the wrong weekend
You say I didn’t watch the Jets game, well, you’re wrong. I watched every game last weekend. Regardless, the DPOY award was determined PRIOR to the playoffs. Furthermore, the award is based on the ENTIRE regular season – not ONE playoff weekend. How many DPOM awards did Revis this season? Oh yeah, that would be ZERO to Woodson’s THREE (by the way, he’s the first player to EVER be honored with the award multiple times in a season, let alone three times out of four months). Can you imagine the argument for Sharper OVER Revis with that thought process? Afterall, Sharper did win the other DPOM for October, that still leaves Revis with ZERO.
As far as Rex Ryan choosing to not let Revis blitz, he has his way of strategizing how his players will play each game, McCarthy allows Capers the autonomy to do the same. Which is the correct strategy? Well, in the second half of the season (where Woodson won 2 of his 3 DPOM awards) the Jets won 5 of their last 8 while the Packers won 7 of their last 8. Overall, the Jets went 9-7 while the Pack went 11-5.
“Any given Sunday” explains the Packer’s loss against the Cardinals. Based on how everyone in Jets Nation is using this one (non-qualifying) game as an example for why Woodson doesn’t deserve the award is rediculous! Let’s just see if either Revis or Woodson, or both of them can replicate their outstanding season’s next year.
Revis was great but....
you guys keep talking about the elite receivers he covered all season but i noticed something when i looked back at those games….
they were 5-5 in games where revis shut down an elite wr you guys have mentioned. i did not count the playoff game because this is a regular season award and i didnt count the colts game because the colts pulled their starters with a lead. before you cry though i gave you credit for a win in the season finale against cincy because you were blowing them out long before they pulled their starters.
so you beat NE, CAR, HOU, BUF, CIN and you lost to NE, BUF, NO, JACK, ATL
also in games where their wasnt an elite WR to cover what was revis doing? i point to the games against miami where the jets gave up more than 30 points twice. also in both NE games he shut down moss and it gave the jets the ability to roll coverage and cover who? first game a rookie playing in his 2nd game as a reciever ever had 98 yards and in the 2nd game wes welker put up 192 yards. sounds to me like you had the wrong guy floating on revis island.
revis had a great year congrats to him and the jets
Woodson over Revis
Thanks for pointing out the stat differences which completely favor Woodson. In addition to that, Revis plays ONE position. Revis only plays corner and alot of the time is sitting in a zone. By the way, Woodson plays every position in the secondary(corner, nickel, safety and some linebacker) and yet he makes plays at every position. By the way, does Revis make the defensive calls as well? Didn’t think so. Also, where are all the good receivers? They are certainly not in the AFC.
Let’s see how the Jets do next year once teams have had time to figure out the gimick defense. Looking forward to Manning putting up 4-5 tds on them on Sunday. I would hope you could win 9 games in a joke of a division.
All Jets fans are lawrys
It’s ok, Woodson won the award and he deserved it. You can argue about how Woodson won because of his stats, but the stats he led in were MUCH more impacting than the ones Revis played in. And saying Woodson playing all over the field didnt matter? It DOES show flexibilty, something Revis clearly didn’t have or wasn’t good enough at to be given a chance. Stop being lawry’s and get over it. You don’t want to be bitter over your loss to the Colts in addition to this.

by 




















